Postmodernism in the eighteenth century? Enlightenment intellectual contexts and the roots of 21st century concerns in Tristram Shandy

XVII-XVIII ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-40
Author(s):  
Jens Martin Gurr
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-819
Author(s):  
Alison Brysk

Since their emergence in the late eighteenth century, doctrines of universal individual rights have been variously criticized as philosophically confused, politically inefficacious, ideologically particular, and Eurocentric. Nevertheless, today the discourse of universal human rights is more internationally widespread and influential than ever. In Evidence for Hope, leading international relations scholar Kathryn Sikkink argues that this is because human rights laws and institutions work. Sikkink rejects the notion that human rights are a Western imposition and points to a wide range of evidence that she claims demonstrates the effectiveness of human rights in bringing about a world that is appreciably improved in many ways from what it was previously. We have invited a broad range of scholars to assess Sikkink’s challenging claims.


2013 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Engberg-Pedersen

This essay examines the role of geometry in military theory around 1700 and its critical reception in Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy. Juxtaposing literature, maps, and war games, the essay outlines a poetics of war in the eighteenth century and traces the decline of the geometrical order that governs it. A forged continuation of Sterne’s novel written in the immediate aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars reveals the development of a new poetics and the installment of a military order based on topography and chance.


Author(s):  
Juhan Hellerma

Abstract In his meticulously researched and conceptually innovative book, Zoltán Boldizsár Simon aims to capture the historical sensibility emergent during the postwar period broadly conceived, spanning from the 1940s to our present moment. Attending particularly to the debates concerning ecological and technological outlooks, Simon theorizes that our historical horizon is increasingly shaped by the expectations of an unprecedented event that challenges the sustainability of the human subject as known today. Arguing that the concept of unprecedented change can best be explained against the backdrop of a modern processual temporal configuration originating in the eighteenth century, Simon likewise probes the same concept to illuminate a distinct relationship with the past. Elaborating on the main ideas of the book, the paper will interrogate critically Simon’s assertion whereby the novel postwar temporality is inherently dystopian, and will negotiate Simon’s engagement with presentism, which he questions as an inaccurate representation of our current regime of historicity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 816-817
Author(s):  
Samuel Moyn

Since their emergence in the late eighteenth century, doctrines of universal individual rights have been variously criticized as philosophically confused, politically inefficacious, ideologically particular, and Eurocentric. Nevertheless, today the discourse of universal human rights is more internationally widespread and influential than ever. In Evidence for Hope, leading international relations scholar Kathryn Sikkink argues that this is because human rights laws and institutions work. Sikkink rejects the notion that human rights are a Western imposition and points to a wide range of evidence that she claims demonstrates the effectiveness of human rights in bringing about a world that is appreciably improved in many ways from what it was previously. We have invited a broad range of scholars to assess Sikkink’s challenging claims.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Zavaleta ◽  
Napoleon Burt

Author(s):  
Michel BRAUD

Resumen: Aparecido en Francia a finales del siglo XVIII en el ámbitoprivado, el diario personal se impone progresivamente en el curso delos siglos XIX y XX como un género literario para conocer diversasmutaciones a finales del siglo XX. La banalización del género, al principiodel siglo XXI, se acompaña de nuevas inflexiones que se identificarán apartir de tres ejemplos. Abstract: Appeared in France at the end of the eighteenth century as aprivate form, the diary progressively became a literary genre during the nineteenth and twentieth century, and underwent various mutations at the end of the twentieth century. The trivialization of the genre at the beginning of the 21st Century is accompanied by new inflections that will be identified on the basis of three examples.


Author(s):  
Joseph Drury

The expansion of the turnpike system and the introduction of steel springs to carriages in the mid-eighteenth century led to a sudden increase in the speed at which people, goods, and information could travel around Britain. Some celebrated the profits and pleasures afforded by this new culture of mobility. Others, including Rousseau, warned that technological improvement was not being matched by comparable advances in health, happiness, and virtue. This chapter reads the radical digressiveness of Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy as a response to the alienating moral effects of the conventional modern novel’s linear, end-oriented narrative machinery. By derailing narrative progress—a rupture signalled in volume VII by the shattering of Tristram’s post-chaise—and withholding closure altogether, Sterne sought to deliver his readers from the circuit of desire, frustration, and disappointment he understood to organize both the experience of reading a modern novel and living in a modern technological society.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 810-811
Author(s):  
Courtney Hillebrecht

Since their emergence in the late eighteenth century, doctrines of universal individual rights have been variously criticized as philosophically confused, politically inefficacious, ideologically particular, and Eurocentric. Nevertheless, today the discourse of universal human rights is more internationally widespread and influential than ever. In Evidence for Hope, leading international relations scholar Kathryn Sikkink argues that this is because human rights laws and institutions work. Sikkink rejects the notion that human rights are a Western imposition and points to a wide range of evidence that she claims demonstrates the effectiveness of human rights in bringing about a world that is appreciably improved in many ways from what it was previously. We have invited a broad range of scholars to assess Sikkink’s challenging claims.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document