Faculty Opinions recommendation of Nucleation of DNA repair factors by FOXA1 links DNA demethylation to transcriptional pioneering.

Author(s):  
Andrew D Sharrocks
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 1003-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Jing Liang ◽  
Luyang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3549-3549
Author(s):  
Yang Xi ◽  
Velizar Shivarov ◽  
Gur Yaari ◽  
Steven Kleinstein ◽  
Matthew P. Strout

Abstract DNA methylation and demethylation at cytosine residues are epigenetic modifications that regulate gene expression associated with early cell development, somatic cell differentiation, cellular reprogramming and malignant transformation. While the process of DNA methylation and maintenance by DNA methyltransferases is well described, the nature of DNA demethylation remains poorly understood. The current model of DNA demethylation proposes modification of 5-methylcytosine followed by DNA repair-dependent cytosine substitution. Although there is debate on the extent of its involvement in DNA demethylation, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) has recently emerged as an enzyme that is capable of deaminating 5-methylcytosine to thymine, creating a T:G mismatch which can be repaired back to cytosine through DNA repair pathways. AID is expressed at low levels in many tissue types but is most highly expressed in germinal center B cells where it deaminates cytidine to uracil during somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination of the immunoglobulin genes. In addition to this critical role in immune diversification, aberrant targeting of AID contributes to oncogenic point mutations and chromosome translocations associated with B cell malignancies. Thus, to explore a role for AID in DNA demethylation in B cell lymphoma, we performed genome-wide methylation profiling in BL2 and AID-deficient (AID-/-) BL2 cell lines (Burkitt lymphoma that can be induced to express high levels of AID). Using Illumina’s Infinium II DNA Methylation assay combined with the Infinium Human Methylation 450 Bead Chip, we analyzed over 450,000 methylation (CpG) sites at single nucleotide resolution in each line. BL2 AID-/- cells had a median average beta value (ratio of the methylated probe intensity to overall intensity) of 0.76 compared with 0.73 in AID-expressing BL2 cells (P < 0.00001), indicating a significant reduction in global methylation in the presence of AID. Using a delta average beta value of ≥ 0.3 (high stringency cut-off whereby a difference of 0.3 or more defines a CpG site as hypomethylated), we identified 5883 CpG sites in 3347 genes that were hypomethylated in BL2 versus BL2 AID-/- cells. Using the Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip and Genome Studio software, we then integrated gene expression and methylation profiles from both lines to generate a list of genes that met the following criteria: 1) contained at least 4 methylation sites within the first 1500 bases downstream of the primary transcriptional start site (TSS 1500; AID is most active in this region during somatic hypermutation); 2) average beta value increased by >0.1 in the TSS 1500 region in BL2 compared with BL2 AID-/- cells; and 3) down-regulated by >50% in BL2 compared with BL2 AID-/- cells. This analysis identified 31 candidate genes targeted for AID-dependent demethylation with consequent changes in gene expression. Interestingly, 15 of these genes have been reported to be bound by AID in association with stalled RNA polymerase II in activated mouse B cells. After validating methylation status in a subset of genes (APOBEC3B, BIN1, DEM1, GRN, GNPDA1) through bisulfite sequencing, we selected DEM1 for further analysis. DEM1 encodes an exonuclease involved in DNA repair and contains 16 CpG sites within its TSS1500, with only one site >50% methylated in BL2 cells compared with 8 of 16 in BL2 AID-/- cells. To assess a direct role for AID in DEM1 methylation status, a retroviral construct (AIDΔL189-L198ER) driving tamoxifen-inducible expression of a C-terminal deletion mutant of AID (increases time spent in the nucleus) was introduced into BL2 AID-/- cells. BL2, BL2 AID-/-, and BL2 AIDΔL189-L198ER cells were cultured continuously for 21 days in the presence of tamoxifen, 100 nM. Bisulfite sequencing of DEM1 TSS 1500 did not demonstrate any significant changes in methylation at day 7. However, at day 21, 13 of the 16 DEM1 TSS 1500 methylation sites in BL2 AIDΔL189-L198ER cells were found to have an increase in the ratio of unmethylated to methylated clones ~10-25% above that of BL2 AID-/- cells. By qPCR, this correlated with a 1.75-fold increase in DEM1 gene expression to levels that were equivalent to that seen in BL2 cells (P = 0.003). Although further investigations are needed, this data supports the notion that AID is able to regulate target gene expression in B cell malignancy through active DNA demethylation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christof Niehrs ◽  
Andrea Schäfer

Neuroreport ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
Yiming Ye ◽  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
Xueke Pan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianing Zhong ◽  
Xianfeng Li ◽  
Wanshi Cai ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Shanshan Dong ◽  
...  

The Ten Eleven Translocation 1 (TET1) protein is a DNA demethylase that regulates gene expression through alteration of DNA methylation. Recent studies have demonstrated that TET1 could modulate transcriptional expression independent of its DNA demethylation activity; however, the detailed mechanisms underlying TET1’s role in such transcriptional regulation remain not well understood. Here, we uncovered that Tet1 formed a chromatin complex with histone acetyltransferase Mof and scaffold protein Sin3a in mouse embryonic stem cells by integrative genomic analysis using publicly available ChIP-seq data sets. Specifically, the TET1/SIN3A/hMOF complex mediates acetylation of histone H4 at lysine 16, via facilitating the binding of hMOF on chromatin, to regulate expression of important DNA repair genes in DNA double strand breaks, including TP53BP1, RAD50, RAD51, and BRCA1, for homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining repairs. Under hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage, dissociation of TET1 and hMOF from chromatin, concurrent with increased binding of SIRT1 on chromatin, led to hypo-acetylation of H4K16, reduced expression of these DNA repair genes, and DNA repair defects in a DNA methylation independent manner. A similar epigenetic dynamic alteration was also observed in H-RASV12 oncogenic-transformed cells, supporting the notion that suppression of TET1 downregulates DNA repair genes through modifying H4K16ac, instead of its demethylation function, and therefore contribute to tumorigenesis. Taken together, our results suggested a mechanistic link between a novel TET1 complex and H4K16ac, DNA repair genes expression, and genomic instability.


F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1112
Author(s):  
Simon D. Schwarz ◽  
Eliane Grundbacher ◽  
Alexandra M. Hrovat ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Anna Kuśnierczyk ◽  
...  

Mechanistic and functional studies by gene disruption or editing approaches often suffer from confounding effects like compensatory cellular adaptations generated by clonal selection. These issues become particularly relevant when studying factors directly involved in genetic or epigenetic maintenance. To provide a genetic tool for functional and mechanistic investigation of DNA-repair mediated active DNA demethylation, we generated experimental models in mice and murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs) based on a minigene of the thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG). The loxP-flanked miniTdg is rapidly and reliably excised in mice and ESCs by tamoxifen-induced Cre activation, depleting TDG to undetectable levels within 24 hours. We describe the functionality of the engineered miniTdg in mouse and ESCs (TDGiKO ESCs) and validate the pluripotency and differentiation potential of TDGiKO ESCs as well as the phenotype of induced TDG depletion. The controlled and rapid depletion of TDG allows for a precise manipulation at any point in time of multistep experimental procedures as presented here for neuronal differentiation in vitro. Thus, we provide a tested and well-controlled genetic tool for the functional and mechanistic investigation of TDG in active DNA (de)methylation and/or DNA repair with minimal interference from adaptive effects and clonal selection.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fischer ◽  
Jin‐Hoe Huh ◽  
Jon Penterman ◽  
Mary Gehring ◽  
Daniel Zilberman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document