Faculty Opinions recommendation of Performance of four frailty classifications in older patients with cancer: prospective elderly cancer patients cohort study.

Author(s):  
Maria-José Molina-Garrido
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Beinse ◽  
Delphine Reitter ◽  
Lauriane Segaux ◽  
Muriel Carvahlo-Verlinde ◽  
Benoit Rousseau ◽  
...  

BJGP Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen19X101658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Dauphin ◽  
Leontien Jansen ◽  
Tine De Burghgraeve ◽  
Laura Deckx ◽  
Frank Buntinx ◽  
...  

BackgroundReceiving a cancer diagnosis can be a major life event which causes distress even years after primary treatment.AimTo examine the prevalence of distress in older patients with cancer (OPCs) up until 5 years post-diagnosis, and identify predictors present at time of diagnosis. Results are compared with reference groups of middle-aged patients with cancer (MPCs) and older patients without a cancer diagnosis (OPs).Design & settingOPCs, MPCs, and OPs participated in a longitudinal cohort study in Belgium and the Netherlands by filling in questionnaires at designated time points from 2010–2019.MethodData from 541 patients were analysed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.ResultsAt baseline, 40% of OPCs, 37% of MPCs, and 17% of OPs reported distress. After 5 years, 35% of OPCs, 23% of MPCs, and 25% of OPs reported distress. No significant predictors for long-term distress in OPCs and OPs were found. For MPCs, it was found that baseline distress (odds ratio [OR] 2.94; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.40 to 6.19) and baseline fatigue (OR 4.71; 95% CI = 1.81 to 12.31) predicted long-term distress.ConclusionDistress is an important problem for people with cancer, with peaks at different moments after diagnosis. Feelings of distress are present shortly after diagnosis but they decrease quickly for the majority of patients. In the long term, however, OPCs in particular appear to be most at risk for distress. This warrants extra attention from primary healthcare professionals, such as GPs who are often patients’ first medical contact point. More research into risk factors occurring later in an illness trajectory might shed more light on predictors for development of long-term distress.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix452
Author(s):  
M. Laurent ◽  
E. Paillaud ◽  
M. Carvalho-Verlinde ◽  
P. Caillet ◽  
A. Le Thuaut ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Gouraud ◽  
Elena Paillaud ◽  
Claudia Martinez‐Tapia ◽  
Lauriane Segaux ◽  
Nicoleta Reinald ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Canoui-Poitrine ◽  
Nicoleta Reinald ◽  
Marie Laurent ◽  
Esther Guery ◽  
Philippe Caillet ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19651-19651
Author(s):  
M. Molina-Garrido ◽  
C. Guillén-Ponce ◽  
A. Carrato

19651 Background: Age is the major risk factor for the majority of patients with cancer. More than 50% of cancers occurs after the age of 60. Older patients are not simply old, but are geriatric patients because of interacting psychosocial and physical problems. As a consequence, the health status of old persons cannot be evaluated by merely describing the single disease or the group of age. We tested the performance of a new Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and its relationship with groups of age in cancer patients. Methods: Between June 2006 and December 2006, a total of 64 oncologic patients older than 75 years were approached to enrol in our study to analyze their functional, physical, mental, pharmacotherapeutic and socio-economic status and to correlate them to some groups of age: youngest-old (75 to 80 years-old), old-old (80 and 85 years-old) and oldest-old (older than 85 years). They were analysed Activities of Daily Living (ADL) measured by Barthel Scale, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) measured by Lawton-Brody Scale, Grade of Fragility measured by Barber Scale, cognitive evaluation measured by Pfeiffer Test, and medication intake. A Chi Squared test was used for statistical analysis; p-value <0,05 was considered significative. Results: Sixty-four oncologic patients age > or = 75 years were recruited. Median age was 80.24 years (range 73.88 to 86.94). 51.6% female. Breast cancer was the most frequent diagnosis (30.2%), followed by lung cancer (19%). 29 patients (45.3%) were aged between 75 and 80 years old; 27 patients (43.5%) were between 80 and 85 years- old. There were statistic significative association between groups of age and Pfeiffer Test (p=0.037), Barber Scale (p=0.031) and medication intake (p=0.021). However, there was not a significative relationship between groups of age and Barthel Scale (p=0.052), Lawton-Brody Scale (p=0.2425), Cruz-Roja Scale (p=0,1485) or number of geriatric syndromes (p=0.129). Conclusions: This abstract reviews the findings regarding the correlation between a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and groups of age in older patients with cancer. Age per se must not be the only criterion for medical decision as it is not correlated to the health status of older cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document