Faculty Opinions recommendation of High Rates of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV-Infected Women Who Do Not Meet Screening Guidelines.

Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gaisa ◽  
Fanny Ita-Nagy ◽  
Keith Sigel ◽  
Yotam Arens ◽  
Mary Ann Hennessy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected women have a higher burden of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer (AC) compared with HIV-uninfected women. Guidelines for AC screening in this population are heterogeneous. Here we report outcomes and risk factors for anal HSIL following implementation of universal AC screening offered to all HIV-infected women. Methods Data from women who underwent AC screening with anal cytology from April 2009 to July 2014 were analyzed. Routine clinical data included anal and cervical cytology, demographic/behavioral data, and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) results. We evaluated the association of cytology with HRA results, and predictors of HSIL pathology, and compared rates of HSIL pathology among women meeting screening guidelines to those who did not. Results Seven hundred forty-five HIV-infected women were screened with anal cytology. Thirty-nine percent had abnormal anal cytology on initial screen and 15% on secondary screen; 208 women underwent HRA following abnormal anal cytology. HSIL was found in 26% and 18% of anal biopsies following initial and secondary screening, respectively. One woman had AC. Cigarette smoking more than doubled HSIL risk. Among women who underwent AC screening despite not meeting existing guideline criteria, 21% and 10%, respectively, were found to have HSIL on biopsy. Neither meeting criteria for screening nor history of receptive anal sex was significantly associated with HSIL. Conclusions Anal HSIL is common in HIV-infected women. Substantial numbers of HSIL would have been missed by strictly adhering to existing AC screening guidelines. These results support routine screening of all HIV-infected women regardless of human papillomavirus history or sexual practices.


2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Eleutério Jr ◽  
Paulo César Giraldo ◽  
Ana Katherine Gonçalves ◽  
Diane Isabelle Magno Cavalcante ◽  
Francisco Valdeci de Almeida Ferreira ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiang Hui ◽  
Katrine Hansen ◽  
Jayasimha Murthy ◽  
Danielle Chau ◽  
C. James Sung ◽  
...  

Objective: A vast majority of cervicovaginal intraepithelial lesions are caused by high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs). The Pap test has been the sole method used for the screening of cervicovaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL). Recently, the FDA approved an HPV-DNA assay as a method of primary screening. We report on a series of FDA-approved HPV-DNA test-negative SIL with HPV genotyping, using an alternative method on the corresponding surgical biopsy specimens. Study Design: A retrospective review identified cytology-positive HPV-negative cases over a 15-month period at a tertiary care gynecologic oncology institution. Corresponding biopsies were reviewed and genotyped for high-risk HPVs. Results: Of the 18,200 total cases, 17 patients meeting the study criteria were selected with 27 surgical specimens corresponding to their cytologic diagnoses. Four patients with high-grade lesions were identified, 3 of whom (75%) were positive for HPV. One of these 4 patients (25%) showed high-grade SIL on biopsies from 4 separate sites in the cervix and vagina. Multiviral HPV infections were frequent. Conclusions: We discuss the relevance of cotesting for screening cervical SILs and emphasize that false-negative results are possible with the FDA-approved HPV screening assay, also in patients with high-grade SIL. These cases may be detectable by cytologic examination and this suggests that the Pap test remains an important diagnostic tool.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Jay ◽  
J. Michael Berry ◽  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Misha Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth Holly ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1079-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry L. Woodhouse ◽  
Janet F. Stastny ◽  
Patricia E. Styer ◽  
Mary Kennedy ◽  
Amy H. Praestgaard ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective.—To determine whether, on a national cytology proficiency test, a competent cytologist can consistently distinguish grades of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Design.—Results for low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion referenced slides from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology for 1996 and 1997 were analyzed including educational, nongraded vs graded validated slides. Results.—The discrepant rate between low- and high- grade lesions ranged from 9.8% to 15% for cytotechnologist, pathologist, laboratory, and all responses. There was a statistically significant difference in performance on graded, validated slides vs educational slides with better performance on validated slides. Conclusion.—This significant interobserver variability in subclassification of squamous lesions should be considered in management guidelines for abnormal Papanicolaou test results and implementation of national cytology proficiency testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document