Faculty Opinions recommendation of Gene Expression Signature for Prediction of Golimumab Response in a Phase 2a Open-Label Trial of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Author(s):  
Jack Satsangi
2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1008-1011.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Telesco ◽  
Carrie Brodmerkel ◽  
Hongyan Zhang ◽  
Lilianne (Lee-Lian) Kim ◽  
Jewel Johanns ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1508-1508
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E Lancet ◽  
Eric Feldman ◽  
Matthew C Foster ◽  
Ivana Gojo ◽  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1508 Background: Tipifarnib is an orally bioavailable farnesyltransferase inhibitor with well-established antileukemic activity in a minority of unselected patients with AML. Seeking to identify patients most likely to have tipifarnib-responsive AML, we applied a PCR-based quantitative 2 gene expression signature ratio (RASGRP1:APTX), which had been tested and validated retrospectively as a predictor of response and survival in previous large studies of tipifarnib, as a molecular screening tool for selection of patients to this pilot trial. Objectives: 1) primary: to determine the complete response (CR +CRi) rate in AML patients prospectively selected for tipifarnib treatment on the basis of a 2-gene signature (RASGRP1:APTX ratio) in bone marrow aspirates. 2) secondary: to assess safety, overall survival, and immunophenotypic expression of RASGRP1 on baseline bone marrow blasts for correlation with PCR-based detection. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study. Key eligibility criteria included 1) patients with previously untreated AML, age ≥65 years and deemed unsuitable for or refusing traditional induction chemotherapy, and 2) RASGRP1: APTX ratio of ≥5.0 (measured in bone marrow aspirate) based upon qRT-PCR. Other inclusion criteria included: ECOG PS 0–2, adequate end-organ function, and WBC < 30,000/microliter. Treatment consisted of Tipifarnib 300 mg BID × 21 days, with 7 days off. Dose escalation to 600 mg BID following cycle 1 was permitted for patients who had stable disease (SD) after cycle 1. Patients who achieved CR/CRi or PR after 2 cycles were eligible to continue treatment for up to 6 cycles maximum. Results: A total of 62 patients were consented to the trial. Of these, 21 (34%) were eligible based upon the required 2-gene ratio. Assay results were reported within 72 hours for all patients. Median age was 75 years. Fourteen (67%) patients had adverse karyotype and 14 (67%) had secondary AML (including 7 patients who received prior therapy for MDS). Three patients were replaced during cycle 1, due to withdrawal of consent or early unrelated death, such that 18 patients were considered evaluable for response. Median RASGRP1:APTX was 14.8. Two patients (11%) achieved CR and 6 (33%) additional patients had both SD and achievement of ≥50% reduction in bone marrow blasts by completion of cycle 2. Two of these 6 patients also had ≥50% increase in peripheral blood neutrophils or platelets. All 8 patients with CR or SD received at least 2 cycles of therapy. There was no correlation between baseline RASGRP1:APTX ratio and response. Overall, tipifarnib was well tolerated. Early death (≤ 30 days) was observed in only 1 patient (5%). The most common therapy-related non-hematologic toxicities (mainly grade 1–2) included: anorexia (33%), nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), febrile neutropenia (23%) and diarrhea (23%). Due to the trial not meeting its primary endpoint of at least 3 CR/CRi after 2 cycles, accrual to the trial was suspended. Conclusion: Monotherapy with tipifarnib in preselected elderly patients with AML and a RASGRP1:APTX ratio of ≥5 was associated with significant antileukemic activity and good tolerance. Although the primary endpoints during the first stage of the trial were not met, this study demonstrated the ability to rapidly and efficiently execute a biomarker-driven trial in an aggressive malignancy. Given the observed antileukemic activity in this selected population, along with a favorable toxicity and bioavailability profile for chronic dosing, further study of tipifarnib with less rigid endpoints than CR/CRi is warranted. Updated survival and RASGRP1 protein expression data will also be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Tipifarnib in AML. Knoblauch:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Karkera:Johnson & Johnson: Employment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Kobunai ◽  
Etsuko Toda ◽  
Takamitsu Kanazawa ◽  
Yoshihiro Kazama ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7002-7002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Toma ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Olivier Kosmider ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
Aspasia Stamatoullas ◽  
...  

7002 Background: ESAs, the first line treatments of anemia in non del 5q lower risk MDS, yield only 40-50% responses. LEN gives RBC transfusion independence (TI) in about 25% of ESA resistant (or relapsing) TD lower risk MDS without del 5q (Raza, Blood, 2008), and a gene expression signature can predict response (Ebert, Plos Med 2008). We randomized in this patient population LEN alone and LEN+EPO. Methods: In this prospective multicenter open-label phase II study (NCT01718379), lower risk MDS patients without del 5q, with TD (≥4 RBC units during the previous 8 weeks (w)) with ESA resistance or relapse after a response were randomized between LEN alone, 10mg/d x 21 d/4 w (L arm) or LEN (same schedule) + EPO beta, 60 000 U/w (LE arm). The primary endpoint was erythroid response (HI-E, IWG 2006 criteria) after 4 treatment cycles. Secondary objectives included identification of biomarkers of response. Results: Between July 2010 and June 2012, 132 patients (pts, 66 / arm), median age 73 (range 46-88), M/F: 88/44 were enrolled. Median TD was 6 RBC units/8w (range 2-18). IPSS was Low in 45% and Int-1 in 55% pts. Pretreatment characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. All but 3 pts, who withdrew consent (2L+1LE), were evaluable for response. In this ITT population, HI-E was obtained in 15 pts (23.4%) in L arm and 26 (40.0%) in LE arm (RR= 1.7, p= 0.043, chi2 test), and TI in 9 (14.1%) versus 16 (24.6%) pts (RR=1.7, p= 0.13). In the 99 pts who completed 4 treatment cycles, 41 achieved HI-E, including 15/49 (30.6%) in L arm versus 26/50 (52.0%) in LE arm (p= 0.03), and TI in 9 (18.4%) versus 16 (32.0%) pts (RR= 1.7, p=0.12). Side effects (cytopenias and 1 DVT/arm) were similar in the 2 arms. A 29-gene expression profile signature predicting HI-E to L or LE, different from that previously published, was identified and a polymorphism in the CRBN gene (Kosmider, submitted) was significantly associated with HI-E in the entire cohort (p=0.034). Conclusions: LEN + EPO yielded a significantly better erythroid response than LEN alone in lower risk MDS patients with anemia resistant to ESA alone. A gene expression signature and a CRBN gene polymorphism correlated with the erythroid response. Clinical trial information: NCT01718379.


Allergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 3248-3260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanaël Lemonnier ◽  
Erik Melén ◽  
Yale Jiang ◽  
Stéphane Joly ◽  
Camille Ménard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document