Faculty Opinions recommendation of Factors Associated with Ipsilateral Limb Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Femoral Cannulation Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Author(s):  
Navin Kapur
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Yau ◽  
Yu Xia ◽  
Saadat Shariff ◽  
William A. Jakobleff ◽  
Stephen Forest ◽  
...  

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Bonicolini ◽  
Gennaro Martucci ◽  
Jorik Simons ◽  
Giuseppe M. Raffa ◽  
Cristina Spina ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Appelt ◽  
Alois Philipp ◽  
Thomas Mueller ◽  
Maik Foltan ◽  
Matthias Lubnow ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. e103-e104
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Hanley ◽  
William C. Mackey ◽  
Payam Salehi ◽  
Mark D. Iafrati ◽  
Luis Suarez

Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Kaufeld ◽  
Eric Beckmann ◽  
Fabio Ius ◽  
Nurbol Koigeldiev ◽  
Wiebke Sommer ◽  
...  

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is a well-established tool in the care of severe refractory cardiac and respiratory failure. The application of this support may serve as a bridge to transplant, recovery or to implantation of a ventricular assist device. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can be administered through an open surgical access via the common femoral or axillary artery or a percutaneous approach using Seldinger technique. Both techniques may obstruct the blood flow to the lower limb and may cause a significant ischemia with possible limb loss. Malperfusion of the distal limb can be avoided using an ipsilateral distal limb perfusion, which may be established by adding a single-lumen catheter during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment to overcome the obstruction. The aim of this study is to distinguish the presence or absence of a distal limb perfusion regarding the incidence of distal limb ischemia. Furthermore, expected risk factors of open and percutaneous femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation installation were evaluated for the development of distal limb ischemia. Methods: Between January 2012 and September 2015, 489 patients received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at our institution. In total, 307 patients (204 male, 103 female) with femoral cannulation were included in the analysis. The cohort was distinguished by the presence (group A; n = 237) or absence (group B; n = 70) of a distal limb perfusion during peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. Furthermore, a risk factor analysis for the development of distal limb ischemia was performed. Results: The main indications for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy were a low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) (53%) and failed weaning of extracorporeal circulation (23%). A total of 23 patients (7.49%) under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support developed severe distal limb malperfusion (3.38% in group A vs 21.42% in group B). Preemptive installation of distal limb perfusion extended the intervention-free intervals to 7.8 ± 19.3 days in group A and 6.3 ± 12.5 in group B. A missing distal limb perfusion (p = 0.001) was identified as a main risk factor for critical limb ischemia. Other comorbidities such as arterial occlusion disease (p = 0.738) were not statistically significantly associated. Surgical intervention due to vascular complications after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation explantation was needed in 14 cases (4.22% in group A and 5.71% in group B). Conclusion: We were able to identify the absence of distal limb perfusion as an independent risk factor for the development of critical distal limb ischemia during femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. The application of a distal limb perfusion should be considered as a mandatory approach in the context of femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment regardless of the implantation technique.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Stephens ◽  
Aqsa Shakoor ◽  
Shimon E. Jacobs ◽  
Shunpei Okochi ◽  
Ariela L. Zenilman ◽  
...  

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide crucial support for single ventricle (SV) patients at various stages of palliation. However, characterization of the utilization and outcomes of ECMO in these unique patients remains incompletely studied. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of SV patients between 2010 and 2017 who underwent ECMO cannulation with primary end point of survival to discharge and secondary end point of survival to decannulation or orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Multivariate analysis was performed for factors predictive of survival to discharge and survival to decannulation. Results: Forty SV patients with a median age of one month (range: 3 days to 15 years) received ECMO support. The incidence of ECMO was 14% for stage I, 3% for stage II, and 4% for stage III. Twenty-seven (68%) patients survived to decannulation, and 21 (53%) patients survived to discharge, with seven survivors to discharge undergoing OHT. Complications included infection (40%), bleeding (40%), thrombosis (33%), and radiographic stroke (45%). Factors associated with survival to decannulation included pre-ECMO lactate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.90, P = .013) and post-ECMO bicarbonate (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.0-1.5, P = .018). Factors associated with survival to discharge included central cannulation (HR: 40.0, 95% CI: 3.1-500.0, P = .005) and lack of thrombotic complications (HR: 28.7, 95% CI: 2.1-382.9, P = .011). Conclusions: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be useful to rescue SV patients with approximately half surviving to discharge, although complications are frequent. Early recognition of the role of heart transplant is imperative. Further study is required to identify areas for improvement in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document