scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder.

Author(s):  
John Nurnberger
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Grove ◽  
◽  
Stephan Ripke ◽  
Thomas D. Als ◽  
Manuel Mattheisen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1851
Author(s):  
Bàrbara Torrico ◽  
Ester Antón-Galindo ◽  
Noèlia Fernàndez-Castillo ◽  
Eva Rojo-Francàs ◽  
Sadaf Ghorbani ◽  
...  

The 14-3-3 protein family are molecular chaperones involved in several biological functions and neurological diseases. We previously pinpointed YWHAZ (encoding 14-3-3ζ) as a candidate gene for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) through a whole-exome sequencing study, which identified a frameshift variant within the gene (c.659-660insT, p.L220Ffs*18). Here, we explored the contribution of the seven human 14-3-3 family members in ASD and other psychiatric disorders by investigating the: (i) functional impact of the 14-3-3ζ mutation p.L220Ffs*18 by assessing solubility, target binding and dimerization; (ii) contribution of common risk variants in 14-3-3 genes to ASD and additional psychiatric disorders; (iii) burden of rare variants in ASD and schizophrenia; and iv) 14-3-3 gene expression using ASD and schizophrenia transcriptomic data. We found that the mutant 14-3-3ζ protein had decreased solubility and lost its ability to form heterodimers and bind to its target tyrosine hydroxylase. Gene-based analyses using publicly available datasets revealed that common variants in YWHAE contribute to schizophrenia (p = 6.6 × 10−7), whereas ultra-rare variants were found enriched in ASD across the 14-3-3 genes (p = 0.017) and in schizophrenia for YWHAZ (meta-p = 0.017). Furthermore, expression of 14-3-3 genes was altered in post-mortem brains of ASD and schizophrenia patients. Our study supports a role for the 14-3-3 family in ASD and schizophrenia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 3594-3605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan B. Campbell ◽  
Nina B. Leezenbaum ◽  
Emily N. Schmidt ◽  
Taylor N. Day ◽  
Celia A. Brownell

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaowaluck Hongkaew ◽  
Andrea Gaedigk ◽  
Bob Wilffert ◽  
Roger Gaedigk ◽  
Wiranpat Kittitharaphan ◽  
...  

We investigated the association between genetic variations in pharmacodynamic genes and risperidone-induced increased prolactin levels in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In a retrospective study, variants of pharmacodynamic genes were analyzed in 124 ASD patients treated with a risperidone regimen for at least 3 months. To simplify genotype interpretation, we created an algorithm to calculate the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene genetic risk score. There was no relationship between prolactin levels and single SNPs. However, the H1/H3 diplotype (A2/A2-Cin/Cin-A/G) of DRD2/ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1 (ANKK1) Taq1A, DRD2 -141C indel, and DRD2 -141A>G, which had a genetic risk score of 5.5, was associated with the highest median prolactin levels (23 ng/ml). As the dose-corrected plasma levels of risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone, and the active moiety increased, prolactin levels in patients carrying the H1/H3 diplotype were significantly higher than those of the other diplotypes. DRD2 diplotypes showed significantly high prolactin levels as plasma risperidone levels increased. Lower levels of prolactin were detected in patients who responded to risperidone. This is the first system for describing DRD2 haplotypes using genetic risk scores based on their protein expression. Clinicians should consider using pharmacogenetic-based decision-making in clinical practice to prevent prolactin increase.


Author(s):  
Jarle Johannessen ◽  
Terje Nærland ◽  
Sigrun Hope ◽  
Tonje Torske ◽  
Anett Kaale ◽  
...  

AbstractClinical relevance of genetic testing is increasing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Information about genetic risk may contribute to improved diagnostics, treatment and family planning, but may also be perceived as a burden. Knowledge about the families’ preferences with regard to genetic risk information is important for both health care professionals and policy makers. We investigated attitudes towards sharing information about genetic risk of ASD and knowledge about future health among parent members of the Norwegian Autism Association (N = 1455) using a questionnaire, and the relationships with parent and child characteristics, such as age, gender and ASD severity. Most preferred autonomy in deciding whom to inform about genetic risk of ASD (74.4%) and a minority supported extensive intra-familial disclosure of the genetic risk (41.1%). The majority agreed that it is an obligation to know as much as possible relevant for future health (58.0%) and only 51.7% agreed to a principle of a ‘right not to know’. In regression models, the attitudes were associated with opinions about benefits and harms of genetic testing (e.g., treatment, family planning, understanding of ASD pathology, insurance discrimination and family conflict). In sum, the findings show that most parents want to know as much as possible relevant for their children’s future health and keep their autonomy and intra-familial confidentiality about genetic risk information. Nearly half of the parents were not concerned with a “right not to know”. These attitudes can inform development of guidelines and bioethics in the age of genomic precision medicine.


Author(s):  
Lambertus Klei ◽  
Lora Lee McClain ◽  
Behrang Mahjani ◽  
Klea Panayidou ◽  
Silvia De Rubeis ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundGenetic studies have implicated rare and common variation in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of the discovered risk variants, those rare in the population invariably have large impact on liability, while common variants have small effects. Yet, collectively, common risk variants account for the majority of population-level variability. How these rare and common risk variants jointly affect liability for individuals requires further study.MethodsTo explore how common and rare variants jointly affect liability, we assessed two cohorts of ASD families characterized for rare and common genetic variation (Simons Simplex Collection and Population-Based Autism Genetics & Environment Study). We analyzed data from 3,011 affected subjects, as well as two cohorts of unaffected individuals characterized for common genetic variation: 3,011 subjects matched for ancestry to ASD subjects; and 11,950 subjects for estimating allele frequencies. We used genetic scores, which assessed the relative burden of common genetic variation affecting risk for ASD (henceforth burden), and determined how this burden was distributed among three subpopulations: ASD subjects who carry a rare damaging variant implicated in risk for ASD (mutation carriers); ASD subjects who do not (non-carriers); and unaffected subjects, who are assumed to be non-carriers.ResultsBurden harbored by ASD subjects is stochastically greater than that harbored by control subjects. For mutation carriers, their average burden is intermediate between non-carrier ASD and control subjects. Both carrier and non-carrier ASD subjects have greater burden, on average, than control subjects. The effects of common and rare variants likely combine additively to determine individual-level liability.LimitationsOnly 258 ASD subjects were known mutation carriers. This relatively small subpopulation limits this study to characterizing general patterns of burden, as opposed to effects of specific mutations or genes. Also, a small fraction of subjects that are categorized as non-carriers could be mutation carriers.ConclusionsLiability arising from common and rare risk variation likely combine additively to determine risk for any individual diagnosed with ASD. On average, ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they also carry a rare mutation affecting risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document