Positron emission mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Farahati ◽  
A. G. Müller ◽  
E. Gillman ◽  
M. Hentschel ◽  
F. H. H. Müller
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Glandular Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Positron Emission Mammography ◽  
Positron Emission

SummaryAim: To evaluate the diagnostic value (sensitivity, specificity) of positron emission mammography (PEM) in a single site non-interventional study using the maximum PEM uptake value (PUVmax). Patients, methods: In a singlesite, non-interventional study, 108 patients (107 women, 1 man) with a total of 151 suspected lesions were scanned with a PEM Flex Solo II (Naviscan) at 90 min p.i. with 3.5 MBq 18F-FDG per kg of body weight. In this ROI(region of interest)-based analysis, maximum PEM uptake value (PUV) was determined in lesions, tumours (PUVmaxtumour), benign lesions (PUVmaxnormal breast) and also in healthy tissues on the contralateral side (PUVmaxcontralateral breast). These values were compared and contrasted. In addition, the ratios of PUVmaxtumour / PUVmaxcontralateral breast and PUVmaxnormal breast / PUVmaxcontralateral breast were compared. The image data were interpreted independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians and compared with histology in cases of suspected carcinoma. Results: Based on a criteria of PUV>1.9, 31 out of 151 lesions in the patient cohort were found to be malignant (21%). A mean PUVmaxtumour of 3.78 ± 2.47 was identified in malignant tumours, while a mean PUVmaxnormal breast of 1.17 ± 0.37 was reported in the glandular tissue of the healthy breast, with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean ratio between tumour and healthy glandular tissue in breast cancer patients (3.15 ± 1.58) was found to be significantly higher than the ratio for benign lesions (1.17 ± 0.41, p < 0.001). Conclusion: PEM is capable of differentiating breast tumours from benign lesions with 100% sensitivity along with a high specificity of 96%, when a threshold of PUVmax >1.9 is applied.

scholarly journals Comprehensive profiles and diagnostic value of menopausal-specific gut microbiota in premenopausal breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Feng Hou ◽  
Fu Ou-Yang ◽  
Chung-Liang Li ◽  
Fang-Ming Chen ◽  
Chieh-Han Chuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Α Diversity ◽  
Functional Pathways

AbstractIn Western countries, breast cancer tends to occur in older postmenopausal women. However, in Asian countries, the proportion of younger premenopausal breast cancer patients is increasing. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in breast cancer. However, studies on the gut microbiota in the context of breast cancer have mainly focused on postmenopausal breast cancer. Little is known about the gut microbiota in the context of premenopausal breast cancer. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the gut microbial profiles, diagnostic value, and functional pathways in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Here, we analyzed 267 breast cancer patients with different menopausal statuses and age-matched female controls. The α-diversity was significantly reduced in premenopausal breast cancer patients, and the β-diversity differed significantly between breast cancer patients and controls. By performing multiple analyses and classification, 14 microbial markers were identified in the different menopausal statuses of breast cancer. Bacteroides fragilis was specifically found in young women of premenopausal statuses and Klebsiella pneumoniae in older women of postmenopausal statuses. In addition, menopausal-specific microbial markers could exhibit excellent discriminatory ability in distinguishing breast cancer patients from controls. Finally, the functional pathways differed between breast cancer patients and controls. Our findings provide the first evidence that the gut microbiota in premenopausal breast cancer patients differs from that in postmenopausal breast cancer patients and shed light on menopausal-specific microbial markers for diagnosis and investigation, ultimately providing a noninvasive approach for breast cancer detection and a novel strategy for preventing premenopausal breast cancer.

scholarly journals Correlation of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for HER-2 Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients: Single Centre Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Bogdanovska-Todorovska ◽  
Slavica Kostadinova-Kunovska ◽  
Rubens Jovanovik ◽  
Blagica Krsteska ◽  
Goran Kondov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
False Negative ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her 2

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2 is imperative in selecting patients for targeted therapy. Most commonly used test methods for HER-2 are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). We evaluated the concordance between FISH and IHC for HER-2 in breast cancer samples using Food and Drug Administration approved tests.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Archived paraffin tissue blocks from 73 breast cancer patients were used. HER-2 immunostaining was performed using Ventana anti–HER-2 monoclonal antibody. The FISH assay was performed using PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit.RESULTS: Of the 73 cases 68.5% were IHC 0/1+, 15.07% were IHC 2+ and 16.44% were IHC 3+. Successful hybridisation was achieved in 72 cases. HER-2 FISH amplification was determined in 16.67% cases. Ten IHC 3+ and two IHC 2+ cases were FISH positive. Two of the IHC 3+ cases were FISH negative. Concordance rate was 100%, 18.18% and 83.33% for IHC 0/1+, 2+ and 3+ group, respectively. Total concordance was 84.72%, kappa 0.598 (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of IHC in detecting IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ cases was 16.7% and 83.3%, and the specificity was 85% and 96.67%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The consistency between the methods was highest for IHC negative and lowest for IHC equivocal cases. The immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity for IHC 2+/3+ cases and high specificity for IHC 3+ cases. Our results support the view that false-positive rather than false-negative IHC results are a problem with HER-2/IHC testing, and that IHC should be used as an initial screening test, but IHC 2+/ 3+ results should be confirmed by FISH.

The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1943-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond R. Raylman ◽  
Stan Majewski ◽  
Randy Wojcik ◽  
Andrew G. Weisenberger ◽  
Brian Kross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Phantom Study ◽  
Positron Emission Mammography ◽  
Positron Emission
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document