scholarly journals MODEL BISNIS, PENCIPTAAN NILAI DAN PENGUNGKAPAN MODAL INTELEKTUAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-249
Author(s):  
Totok Dewayanto
Keyword(s):  
Business Model ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Business Enterprise ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Business Reporting

Whenever a business enterprise is established, it employs a particular business model that describes the design or architecture of the value creation, delivery, and capture mechanisms it employs. The essence of a business model is in defining the manner by which the enterprise delivers value to customers, entices customers to pay for value, and converts those payments to profit. It thus reflects management’s hypothesis about what customers want, how they want it, and how the enterprise can organize to best meet those needs, get paid for doing so, and make a profit. There is currently significant debate worldwide regarding business reporting. The concept of the ‘business model’ has entered into the discourse, as has the concept of ‘integrated reporting’, adding to the established debate regarding accounting for intangible assets and, more generally, intellectual capital (IC). The purpose of this article is to understand the influence of business model on intellectual capital disclosure.

Improving integrated reporting

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rada Massingham ◽  
Peter Rex Massingham ◽  
John Dumay
Keyword(s):  
Value Creation ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Organisational Learning ◽  
Performance Measurement System ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Strategy Execution ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Future Value

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a new learning and growth perspective for the balanced scorecard (BSC) that includes more specific measures of integrated thinking and value creation to help improve integrated reporting (<IR>). Practical, relevant definitions of these historically vague concepts may improve intangible asset disclosures (IAD) and increase uptake of the<IR> framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper is conceptual. The authors use organisational learning to theorise about the learning and growth perspective of the BSC, within the context of the practice of IAD. Findings Several criticisms of IAD, the<IR>framework and the BSC have acted as barriers to implementing the<IR>framework. The improved version of the BSC’s learning and growth perspective, presented in this paper, addresses those criticisms by redefining the concept of integrated thinking (learning) and more fully connecting that learning to future value creation (growth). The model is designed to be used in tandem with the<IR>framework to operationalise integrated thinking. A new BSC strategy map illustrates how this revised learning and growth perspective interacts with the other three BSC perspectives to create long-term shareholder value through the management and growth of knowledge within an organisation. Research limitations/implications Organisational learning is an important source of competitive advantage in the modern knowledge economy. Here, the authors encourage further debate on how to report and disclose information on intangible assets, driven by a new conceptual strategy for organisational learning that fully supports the BSC’s capacity to help integrated thinking and future value creation for the<IR>framework. Practical implications From its roots as a performance measurement system, the BSC has become a widely used strategy execution tool. The<IR>framework has struggled to gain traction, but still has value in exploring intangible assets and its disclosure from a systems thinking perspective. The model is designed to bring an explicit understanding of how to improve integrated thinking for the<IR>framework facilitating better measurement, management and reporting of human and structural capital. By doing so, the new model enables a firm to use the BSC to engage with<IR>more effectively, which should also be useful for practitioners given the widespread use of the BSC. Originality/value The analysis of the BSC’s learning and growth perspective reveals two dichotomies – one between resources and growth, and another between systems and capability. The revised perspective resolves these dichotomies with clear, forward-focused measures of learning and intangible asset growth, and multiple vertical and horizontal connections between the perspective’s four constructs. The authors demonstrate practical paths to value creation through a range of strategic impacts.

The business model and intellectual capital in the value creation of firms

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ujwary-Gil
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Business Model ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Common Elements ◽  
Dynamic Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Common

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze business model (BM) and intellectual capital (IC) of a firm with a focus on their common elements. The common bases in the field of strategic management for these two concepts are, among others, resource-based view, knowledge-based view, intellectual capital-based view, dynamic capabilities, and configurational approach. It indicates areas in which these two concepts can benefit from each other, e.g. in classification of components, their configuration, or dynamic approach. This general review examines the following research questions: What are the common concepts for the BM and IC? What are their common components? What does the dynamic approach to IC and BM mean? Design/methodology/approach The Web of Science™ Core Collection database was selected for the period 1975-2014 and the Journal of Intellectual Capital (JIC) indexed in Scopus® (Elsevier) was incorporated into the analysis for the period it had been indexed by Scopus (1990-2015). These databases were selected because they offer a reliable overview of historical data regarding journals, articles, and citation impact. The key filter criteria were the presence of the phrases “business model” or “intellectual capital” in the article title, abstract, and key words in order to narrow down the selection to the most appropriate results for the research area. Findings This paper investigates two concepts from the point of view of their underpinnings in management, definitions, and components, as well as value creation. Analysis of the foundations in management allows the author to present a cohesive model, which depicts a comprehensive approach to analysis of these two concepts. Many common elements have been identified and investigated. Originality/value First, it provides an indication of the common underpinnings of the analyzed concepts within the framework of strategic management and proposals for their development toward resource, knowledge, and IC accumulation, combination and heterogeneity-based views. Second, it presents an analysis of the BM and IC components, showing common elements between them. Third, it provides a description and analysis of dynamic view of BM and IC components in a value creation context.

scholarly journals IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF BUSINESS MODEL OF AN ENTERPRISE THROUGH PREPARATION OF INTEGRATED REPORTING

2020 ◽  
pp. 169-177
Author(s):  
O. Pimenova O. ◽  
S. Pimenov
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Business Model ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Management Indicators ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Strategic Assets ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis

The necessity of formation of integrated reporting by Ukrainian enterprises is investigated. The importance of business presentation of information on the company's value creation, its effectiveness, opportunities, risks it faces, and development prospects for investors and other stakeholders in the form of integrated reporting is determined. It is investigated that integrated reporting should provide stakeholders with information on the long-term development of the enterprise in contrast to financial reporting, which cannot provide such full information. That is the main purpose of integrated reporting is to explain to financial capital providers and other stakeholders how an enterprise creates and plans to create the value in the future over a long period of time. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the need of taking into account the needs of stakeholders in the work of enterprise and the disclosure of non-financial information in the form of integrated reporting, which will increase the efficiency of the business model. The methodological basis of the study is a set of general and special principles, provisions and methods of scientific research, the use of which is determined by the purpose and objectives, in particular, methods of generalization, comparison, analysis and synthesis, methods of system and structural analysis, diagnostic evaluation. In particular, in the process of research the methods of generalization, analysis and synthesis were used in defining the concept of integrated reporting and its individual elements; methods of system and structural analysis in the study of the basic principles of integrated reporting; method of comparison in the study of scientific approaches to the formation of integrated reporting. It is substantiated that by providing information on value creation, in particular on the company's competitive advantages, strategic assets, environmental, social and management indicators (ESG), the company will gain an advantage over competitors, effectively implementing its business model in the market and be able to achieve sustainable development in the long run.

An intellectual capital ontology in an integrated reporting context

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Stacchezzini ◽  
Cristina Florio ◽  
Alice Francesca Sproviero ◽  
Silvano Corbella
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Social Ontology ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Creation Story ◽  
Socially Constructed ◽  
The Empirical Analysis

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the intellectual capital (IC) ontology in an integrated reporting context to explore the function that integrated report (IR) preparers assign to IC elements and the role of integrated thinking in this process. Design/methodology/approach Social ontology theory helps elucidate how an energy-sector company socially constructed an IC ontology in which IC is a core element of the value creation story told in the IR. The empirical analysis benefited from in-depth interviews with the corporate staff. Findings The subjective nature of IC ontology emerges, in that IC’s function is defined during the very process of IR preparation. The intangible elements drive sustainability-oriented financial value creation according to the sustainability approach embraced by the company’s business model. Integrated thinking both facilitates this perspective on IC is shared among various departments of the company and provides a procedure for scrutinising what counts as IC in this integrated reporting context. Research limitations/implications The research scope is limited to the IR preparation process. Further research could explore IC ontologies beyond this process. Originality/value This study is the first to explore IC ontology empirically within an innovative integrated reporting context. It opens paths to further research on the relationships between IC and integrated thinking.

scholarly journals Intellectual capital reporting, leadership and strategic change

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Slack ◽  
Matthias Munz
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Corporate Strategy ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Strategic Change ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Leadership Change ◽  
Content Type

Purpose – A change in leadership can signal a shift in corporate strategy to drive future value creation. To help achieve this, a different emphasis may be placed upon the intellectual capital (IC) resources within the organisation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the changes in volume, composition and emphasis of IC disclosure in annual reports mapped against the re-orientation of corporate strategy and associated leadership change. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal period of over three decades (1979-2010) is examined. Adopting a case-based approach, Daimler AG is purposively selected for this research having a number of distinct changes in strategy over the period, reflective of leadership change. Using content analysis, annual report IC-related disclosures (structural, relational and human capital) by Daimler AG are examined, by category and more detailed sub-categories, against corporate strategy. Findings – The composition and emphasis of IC disclosures found in the annual reports changes over the longitudinal period and is reflective of the prevailing corporate strategy at that time. There were four identified periods of strategy, each associated with leadership change. The prevalence and qualitative focus of IC disclosures relevant to each period reflects the importance of respective IC components in corporate value creation. Research limitations/implications – The research is based on annual report IC disclosures within one case company and hence reflect the messages conveyed by that company over the longitudinal period. Additionally, the authors recognise that the annual report is only one source of corporate information, but as a historic record it serves to consistently capture management disclosure over a long-time period. Future research, adopting an econometric approach, could further test the linkages between leadership change, strategic shift and IC-related disclosure. Practical implications – The research reveals how IC-related disclosure shifts to reflect leadership and strategic change within a case company. Through such disclosure, the authors are able to gain greater insight into how a specific business seeks to create value drawing on the components of IC underpinning corporate strategy. Originality/value – The research provides new insights into IC disclosure by mapping its content and emphasis against changes in corporate strategy. This has contemporary significance due to the wider disclosure debate concerning strategy and value creation in the annual report, for instance through integrated reporting. Further, the research shows the value of annual reports for longitudinal disclosure research.

scholarly journals DYNAMIC INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL MODEL IN A COMPANY

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir SHATREVICH ◽  
Deniss ŠČEULOVS ◽  
Elina GAILE-SARKANE
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Model ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Dynamic Nature ◽  
Positive Interaction ◽  
A Company

The aim of this paper is to indicate the relations between company’s value added (VA) and intangible assets. Authors declare that Intellectual capital (IC) is one of the most relevant intangibles for a company, and the concept with measurement, and the relation with value creation is necessary for modern markets. Since relationship between IC elements and VA are complicated, this paper is aimed to create a usable dynamic model for building company’s value added through intellectual capital. The model is incorporating that outputs from IC elements are not homogeneously received and made some contributions to dynamic nature of IC relation and VA. Variables that will help companies to evaluate contribution of each element of IC are added to the model. This paper emphasizes the importance of a company’s IC and the positive interaction between them in generating profits for company.

scholarly journals Intellectual Capital Approach to Modern Management through the Perspective of a Company’s Value Added

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Survilaitė ◽  
Rima Tamošiūnienė ◽  
Vladimir Shatrevich
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Internal Resources ◽  
The World ◽  
A Company

The importance of value creation in small and medium-sized business companies has always been in focus. The changing environment makes a strong impact on all companies all over the world. Nowadays, the value added, which is created by the company, not only depends on tangible but also on intangible assets. It is not enough just to manage internal resources to be efficient or generate high value added. Knowledge and information as an important tool for the management of the external environment have become a new factor of a company. Since elements of the intellectual capital system are intangible and hardly measurable in company’s value added, this paper aims to create a model for the analysis of the creation of a company’s value added through intellectual capital. Subsequent to the review of literature on value creation and management, the authors proposed a model for value creation through intermediate, which presented three main elements of value added creation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document