scholarly journals Experiences of Nurses Working in a Single-Room-Structured Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Jung Hee Youn ◽  
Young Mi Shin ◽  
Su Jin Shin ◽  
Eun Min Hong
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-341
Author(s):  
Hyo Jin Lee ◽  
Eunhye Bae ◽  
Hong Yeul Lee ◽  
Sang-Min Lee ◽  
Jinwoo Lee

Background: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have increased risks of delirium, which is associated with worse outcomes. As pharmacologic treatments for delirium are ineffective, prevention is important. Nonpharmacologic preventive strategies include exposure to natural light and restoring circadian rhythm. We investigated the effect of exposure to natural light through windows on delirium in the ICU.Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed all patients admitted to the medical ICU of a university-affiliated hospital between January and June 2020 for eligibility. The ICU included 12 isolation rooms, six with and six without windows. Patients with ICU stays of >48 hours were included and were divided into groups based on their admission to a single room with (window group) or without windows (windowless group). The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of delirium. The secondary outcomes were the numbers of delirium- and mechanical ventilation-free days, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-ICU and 28-day mortalities.Results: Of the 150 included patients (window group: 83 [55.3%]; windowless group: 67 [44.7%]), the cumulative incidence of delirium was significantly lower in the window group than in the windowless group (21.7% vs. 43.3%; relative risk, 1.996; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.220–3.265). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Admission to a room with a window was independently associated with a decreased risk of delirium (adjusted odds ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.125–0.805).Conclusions: Exposure to natural light through windows was associated with a lower incidence of delirium in the ICU.


2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bonizzoli ◽  
E. Bigazzi ◽  
C. Peduto ◽  
V. Tucci ◽  
G. Zagli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-284
Author(s):  
Frances Fengzhi Lin ◽  
Wendy Chaboyer ◽  
Michelle Foster ◽  
Lucy Hervey ◽  
Andrea P. Marshall

Author(s):  
Teysir Halaby ◽  
Nashwan al Naiemi ◽  
Bert Beishuizen ◽  
Roel Verkooijen ◽  
José A. Ferreira ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1507-1515
Author(s):  
Lauren L. Madhoun ◽  
Robert Dempster

Purpose Feeding challenges are common for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). While sufficient oral feeding is typically a goal during NICU admission, this can be a long and complicated process for both the infant and the family. Many of the stressors related to feeding persist long after hospital discharge, which results in the parents taking the primary role of navigating the infant's course to ensure continued feeding success. This is in addition to dealing with the psychological impact of having a child requiring increased medical attention and the need to continue to fulfill the demands at home. In this clinical focus article, we examine 3 main areas that impact psychosocial stress among parents with infants in the NICU and following discharge: parenting, feeding, and supports. Implications for speech-language pathologists working with these infants and their families are discussed. A case example is also included to describe the treatment course of an infant and her parents in the NICU and after graduation to demonstrate these points further. Conclusion Speech-language pathologists working with infants in the NICU and following hospital discharge must realize the family context and psychosocial considerations that impact feeding progression. Understanding these factors may improve parental engagement to more effectively tailor treatment approaches to meet the needs of the child and family.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document