Effects of order of aerobic exercise and resistance exercise on blood pressure, blood lactate, and energy metabolic rate after exercise

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1067-1077
Author(s):  
Seung-Jun Wi ◽  
Byung-Sun Lee ◽  
Man-Gyoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Blood Lactate

Effects of 12 weeks of aerobic versus combined aerobic plus resistance exercise training on short-term blood pressure variability in patients with hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 1085-1092
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Caminiti ◽  
Ferdinando Iellamo ◽  
Annalisa Mancuso ◽  
Anna Cerrito ◽  
Matteo Montano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Exercise Training ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Resistance Exercise Training ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Combined Exercise ◽  
Resistance Exercises

Combined exercise training (CT) including aerobic plus resistance exercises could be more effective in comparison with aerobic exercise (AT) alone in reducing blood pressure variability (BPV) in hypertensive patients. We report that CT was indeed more effective than AT in reducing short-term BPV, and both exercise modalities reduced BP levels to the same extent. CT appears to be a more appropriate exercise modality if the objective is to reduce BPV in addition to BP levels.

scholarly journals Resistance and aerobic exercise protects against acute endothelial impairment induced by a single exposure to hypertension during exertion

2011 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1013-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane A. Phillips ◽  
Emon Das ◽  
Jingli Wang ◽  
Kirkwood Pritchard ◽  
David D. Gutterman
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Vascular Function ◽  
Cardiovascular Health ◽  
Weight Lifting ◽  
Acute Hypertension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Weight Lifters ◽  
Blood Pressure Responses

Resistance and aerobic exercise is recommended for cardiovascular health and disease prevention. However, the accompanying increase in arterial pressure during resistance exercise may be detrimental to vascular health. This study tests the vascular benefits of aerobic compared with resistance exercise on preventing impaired vascular function induced by a single weight lifting session that is associated with acute hypertension. Healthy, lean sedentary (SED) subjects, weight lifters, runners (>15 miles/wk), and cross trainers (chronic aerobic and resistance exercisers), underwent a single progressive leg press weight lifting session with blood pressure measurements. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD; an index of arterial endothelial function) was determined using ultrasonography immediately before and after weight lifting. Sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) was used to determine endothelium-independent dilation after weight lifting. All subjects were normotensive with similar blood pressure responses during exercise. Baseline FMD was lower in runners (5.4 ± 0.5%; n = 13) and cross trainers (4.44 ± 0.3%; n = 13) vs. SED (8.5 ± 0.8%; n = 13; P = 0.037). Brachial FMD improved in conditioned weight lifters (to 8.8 ± 0.9%; P = 0.007) and runners (to 7.6 ± 0.6%; P < 0.001) but not cross trainers (to 5.3 ± 0.6%; P = NS) after acute hypertension. FMD was decreased in SED (to 5.7 ± 0.4%; P = 0.019). Dilation to nitroglycerin was similar among groups. These data suggest that endothelial responses are maintained after exposure to a single bout of weight lifting in resistance and aerobic athletes. Resistance and aerobic exercise may confer similar protection against acute vascular insults such as exertional hypertension.

Muscle Oxygenation, Neural, and Cardiovascular Responses to Isometric and Workload-matched Dynamic Resistance Exercise

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Kounoupis ◽  
Konstantina Dipla ◽  
Ioannis Tsabalakis ◽  
Stavros Papadopoulos ◽  
Nikiforos Galanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Blood Lactate ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Isometric Exercise ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Muscle Oxygenation ◽  
Dynamic Resistance ◽  
Baroreceptor Sensitivity ◽  
Large Muscle

AbstractDifferences in blood flow patterns and energy cost between isometric and dynamic resistance exercise may result to variant cardiovascular, neural, and muscle metabolic responses. We aimed to compare the cardiovascular, baroreceptor sensitivity, and muscle oxygenation responses between workload-matched, large muscle-mass isometric and dynamic resistance exercises. Twenty-four young men performed an isometric and a dynamic double leg-press protocol (4 sets×2 min) with similar tension time index (workload). Beat-by-beat hemodynamics, baroreceptor sensitivity, muscle oxygenation, and blood lactate were assessed. The increase in blood pressure was greater (p<0.05) in the 1st set during dynamic than isometric exercise (by ~4.5 mmHg), not different in the 2nd and 3rd sets, and greater in the 4th set during isometric exercise (by ~5 mmHg). Dynamic resistance exercise evoked a greater increase in heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and contractility index (p<0.05), and a greater decline in peripheral resistance, baroreceptor sensitivity, and cardiac function indices than isometric exercise (p<0.05). Participants exhibited a greater reduction in muscle oxyhemoglobin and a greater increase in muscle deoxyhemoglobin in dynamic versus isometric exercise (p<0.001–0.05), with no differences in total hemoglobin and blood lactate. In conclusion, large muscle-mass, multiple-set isometric exercise elicits a relatively similar blood pressure but blunted cardiovascular and baroreceptor sensitivity responses compared to workload-matched dynamic resistance exercise. Differences in blood pressure responses between protocols appear small (~5 mmHg) and are affected by the number of sets. The muscle oxidative stimulus is greater during dynamic resistance exercise than workload-matched isometric exercise.

scholarly journals The period of the day affects the twenty-four hour blood pressure response to an acute combined exercise session in Brazilian jiu jitsu athletes

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-289
Author(s):  
Rafaello Pinheiro Mazzoccante ◽  
Ioranny Raquel Castro de Sousa ◽  
Sérgio Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Jonato Prestes ◽  
Herbert Gustavo Simões ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Blood Pressure Response ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Morning Session ◽  
Exercise Session ◽  
Afternoon Session ◽  
Combined Exercise ◽  
Session Versus

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a combined exercise session performed at different periods of the day on the 24h blood pressure (BP) response. Anaerobic threshold (AT) and 12 repetition maximum (12RM) tests were evaluated in nine Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes (male) (22±3.7 y; 176±5.0 cm; 73.4±9.7 kg; 6.8±2.1 % body fat). Four experimental sessions were performed: resistance exercise followed by aerobic exercise [Morning (MornS) and Afternoon (AfternS)] and Control (C) [Morning and Afternoon]. The morning sessions were conducted at 09:00 a.m. and the afternoon sessions were conducted at 3:00 p.m. The resistance exercise consisted of three sets at 90% of a 12RM for six resistance exercises. The aerobic exercise consisted of 15min at 90% of the AT. Blood pressure (BP) was measured before, during and 1h (Microlife(r) BP3A1C) after the performance of exercises in laboratory, and then during daily activities for the succeeding 23h by ambulatory BP monitoring (Dyna-MAPA(r)). Analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) indicated significant reductions in blood pressure parameters at various time points during the 24h monitoring period. For systolic BP (SBP), significantly lower values were shown following the morning session versus the control (MornS: 1756.2±100.8 vs. C: 1818.2±84.3 mmHg*15h; p < .05) and total-24h (MornS: 2695.8±143.3 vs. C: 2784.1±143.2 mmHg*24h; p < .05). The total-24h mean BP (MAP) was also significantly lower following the morning session versus the control (MornS: 2015.7±121.2 vs. C: 2087.3±153.8 mmHg*24h; p < .05). There were significant differences in the sleeping AUC of SBP (AfternS: 883.6±27.0 vs. C: 965.2±67.9 mmHg*9h; p< .05), diastolic BP (DBP) (AfternS: 481.4±30.9 vs. MornS: 552.9±34.2 and C: 562.1±52.3 mmHg*9h; p < .01) and MBP (AfternS: 651.9±22.4 vs. MornS: 708.7±43.1 and C: 726.9±64.7 mmHg*9h; p < .01). The combined exercise performed at different periods of the day contributed distinctly to the reduction of BP. The morning session was important in reducing SBP and MBP in the total-24h monitoring, while the afternoon session reduced SBP, DBP and MBP during sleeping in jiu-Jitsu athletes.

scholarly journals The Acute Cardiorespiratory and Cerebrovascular Response to Resistance Exercise

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake G. Perry ◽  
Samuel J. E. Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Cerebral Autoregulation ◽  
Physiological Responses ◽  
Valsalva Manoeuvre ◽  
Circulatory Response ◽  
Acute Response ◽  
Pressure Profiles ◽  
Abrupt Changes

AbstractResistance exercise (RE) is a popular modality for the general population and athletes alike, due to the numerous benefits of regular participation. The acute response to dynamic RE is characterised by temporary and bidirectional physiological extremes, not typically seen in continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. cycling) and headlined by phasic perturbations in blood pressure that challenge cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. Cerebral autoregulation has been heavily scrutinised over the last decade with new data challenging the effectiveness of this intrinsic flow regulating mechanism, particularly to abrupt changes in blood pressure over the course of seconds (i.e. dynamic cerebral autoregulation), like those observed during RE. Acutely, RE can challenge CBF regulation, resulting in adverse responses (e.g. syncope). Compared with aerobic exercise, RE is relatively understudied, particularly high-intensity dynamic RE with a concurrent Valsalva manoeuvre (VM). However, the VM alone challenges CBF regulation and generates additional complexity when trying to dissociate the mechanisms underpinning the circulatory response to RE. Given the disparate circulatory response between aerobic and RE, primarily the blood pressure profiles, regulation of CBF is ostensibly different. In this review, we summarise current literature and highlight the acute physiological responses to RE, with a focus on the cerebral circulation.

Acute resistance exercise is more effective than aerobic exercise for 24h blood pressure control in type 2 diabetics

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.K. Morais ◽  
C.S.G. Campbell ◽  
M.M. Sales ◽  
D.F. Motta ◽  
S.R. Moreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Blood Pressure Control ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Type 2 Diabetics

scholarly journals Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise intensities on 24-hours blood pressure in normotensive women

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparecido Pimentel Ferreira ◽  
Bruno Rafael Martins Campos ◽  
Édis Rodrigues Junior ◽  
Guilherme Morais Puga ◽  
Ciro José Brito
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Heart Rate Reserve ◽  
Post Exercise ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Exercise Hypotension

The present study aimed to determine the effect of the intensity of aerobic and resistance exercise on the 24h BP response in normotensive women. Twenty-four women (aged 33 ± 9 years) performed five experimental sessions in randomized order: CON - no exercise; AE50 - 50% of heart rate reserve (HRR); AE70 - 70% of HRR; RE40 - 40% of 1repetition maximum (RM) and RE70 - 70% of 1RM. Systolic and diastolic BP and HR measurements were measured during 24h post-exercise at the participant's workplace. The AE50, AE70 and RE40 sessions led to the greatest and longest-lasting effects on the SBP, which persisted for up to 24h. For the DBP, the experimental sessions led to similar results; post exercise hypotension was observed until 7h post-exercise, with the exception of the AE70 session, which produced effects that persisted for 24h. Results shows that both aerobic and resistance exercise performed during the morning can decrease the mean BP above the baseline lasting 24 hours during a normal daily work. The aerobic exercise performed around 50% of HRR can better regulate both systolic and diastolic BP in this population.

Does exercise training affect resting metabolic rate in adolescents with obesity?

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela S. Alberga ◽  
Denis Prud’homme ◽  
Ronald J. Sigal ◽  
Gary S. Goldfield ◽  
Stasia Hadjiyannakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Training ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Aerobic Exercise Training ◽  
Energy Deficit ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Resistance Exercise Training

We evaluated the hypothesis that resistance exercise training performed alone or in combination with aerobic exercise training would increase resting metabolic rate (RMR) relative to aerobic-only and nonexercising control groups. Postpubertal adolescents (N = 304) aged 14–18 years with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 95th percentile) or overweight (BMI ≥ 85th percentile + additional diabetes risk factor(s)) were randomized to 4 groups for 22 weeks: Aerobic exercise training, Resistance exercise training, Combined aerobic and resistance exercise training, or Control. All participants received dietary counselling targeting a daily energy deficit of 250 kcal. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry and body composition by magnetic resonance imaging. There was no significant change in RMR in any group, in spite of significant within-group increases in fat-free mass in the Aerobic, Resistance, and Combined exercise training groups. RMR at baseline and 6 months were Aerobic: 1972 ± 38 and 1990 ± 41; Resistance: 2024 ± 37 and 1992 ± 41; Combined: 2023 ± 38 and 1995 ± 38; Control: 2075 ± 38 and 2073 ± 39 kcal/day (p > 0.05). There were no between-group differences in RMR after adjustment for total body weight or fat-free mass between groups over time. Per-protocol analyses including only participants with ≥70% adherence, and analyses stratified by sex, also showed no within- or between-group differences in RMR. In conclusion, despite an increase in fat-free mass in all exercise groups, 6 months of aerobic, resistance, or combined training with modest dietary restriction did not increase RMR compared with diet only in adolescents with obesity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document