scholarly journals Centro de Documentación - Biblioteca de Mujeres de la Fundacion ipes

2020 ◽  
pp. 1307-1320
Author(s):  
Amaia Barandica Ortiz de Zárate ◽  
Rut Iturbide Rodrigo
Keyword(s):  
Gender Studies ◽  
Awareness Training ◽  
Raising Awareness ◽  
Training And Research ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Gender Theories ◽  
Work Done

RESUMEN En este artículo se presenta el trabajo realizado por el Centro de Documentación-Biblioteca de Mujeres de la Fundación ipes, una biblioteca única en Navarra, especializada en género y feminismos y cuyo servicio es público y gratuito. Dentro de la misma se destaca el trabajo de preservación del legado documental feminista y su actualización; el asesoramiento especializado sobre los últimos avances del pensamiento feminista y los estudios de género; así como la sensibilización, la formación e investigación sobre dichas teorías feministas y de género. LABURPENA Artikulu honetan, ipes Fundazioaren Emakumeen Dokumentazio Zentro eta Liburutegiak egindako lana aurkezten da. Liburutegi bakarra da Nafarroan, generoan eta feminismoetan espezializatua, eta zerbitzu publikoa eta doakoa eskaintzen du. Liburutegiaren barnean, dokumentu-ondare feminista zaindu eta eguneratzeko lana nabarmendu behar da; pentsamolde feministaren eta generoko azterlanen azken aurrerakuntzei buruzko aholkularitza espezializatua; eta bai teoria feminista eta generoko horiei buruzko sentsibilizazioa, prestakuntza eta ikerketa ere. ABSTRACT This article presents the work done by the Documentation Center-Women’s Library of the ipes Foundation, a unique library in Navarra, specialized in gender and feminisms and whose service is public and free. Within it, the work of preservation of the feminist documentary legacy and its update stand out; specialized advice on the latest advances in feminist thinking and gender studies; as well as raising awareness, training and research on these feminist and gender theories.

scholarly journals Is the ‘F’-word still dirty? A past, present and future of/for feminist and gender studies in Organization

Organization ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Harding ◽  
Jackie Ford ◽  
Marianna Fotaki
Keyword(s):  
Gender Studies ◽  
Organization Theory ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
General Interest ◽  
Gender Theory ◽  
Rich Variety ◽  
Feminist Thought ◽  
Gender Perspectives ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Gender Theories

This article looks back at 20 years of feminist/gender theory in Organization. In these years a very rich variety of articles has drawn on feminist and gender perspectives. This suggests that Organization is a welcome site for exploring feminist and gender theories and their contribution to critical analysis of organizations. However, the more theoretically sophisticated work that is to be found in feminist and gender studies has not yet been explored in much depth. There is unfilled potential here. The article looks forward to the next decade by discussing a small selection from the treasure house of feminist theorists and concerns that could offer rich insights for management and organization theory. There are many others; this discussion introduces theorists who will be new to some readers, and might provoke more general interest in feminist thought.

The History of Scholarship on Lois McMaster Bujold’s Science Fiction and Fantasy

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-32
Author(s):  
Robin Anne Reid
Keyword(s):  
Science Fiction ◽  
Gender Studies ◽  
Gender Politics ◽  
Close Attention ◽  
History Of ◽  
Women Scholars ◽  
Citation Practices ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Gender Theories ◽  
Space Opera

This chapter provides a comprehensive and chronological bibliographic survey of scholarship on Lois McMaster Bujold from 1995 onwards. The chapter is structured chronologically to show changes in the scholarship on Bujold’s work and, in addition, includes selected online articles to demonstrate that Bujold’s readers are engaged with the same issues as the academics: genre, gender politics, and feminisms. The chapter shows the broad areas of scholarly consensus that exist: primarily, the agreement that Bujold’s work subverts, reverses, or complicates the genre conventions of space opera, military sf, and medievalist fantasy. The primary area of disagreement is shown to be the question of feminism in her work. The chapter is explicitly feminist in that the scholar writing the essay is a feminist specializing in feminist and gender theories and speculative fiction who applies those intellectual frameworks in this essay. It therefore pays close attention to citation practices, and puts on record the extent to which the first work on Bujold’s science fiction and fantasy was done by women scholars working in disability, feminist, and gender studies as well as the extent to which their work makes up the majority of the current scholarship.

Violencia de (L) género: “Hacia una sofística de la materialidad de los cuerpos” / Violent gender: “To a sophistry of the materiality of bodies”

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (09) ◽  
pp. 83-97
Author(s):  
Claudio Reyes Lozano
Keyword(s):  
Gender Studies ◽  
Material Body ◽  
Aristotelian Logic ◽  
Political Position ◽  
Basic Assumptions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Critical Gender Studies

Los estudios críticos de género sustancialistas desconocen su posición teórico-política en el momento de explayar algunas de sus hipótesis fundamentales. El presente estudio intenta dar cuenta de las consecuencias éticas que asume llevar hasta el final algunas de estas posiciones teóricas. Advertimos así que obras fundamentales de estos estudios se apropian con claridad, y sin saberlo, de una lógica aristotélica para tratar la asunción material del cuerpo, el sujeto y el género ¿Qué encontramos específicamente en esta lógica? Esta última se caracteriza por tener su raíz en una ontología inamovible, en donde cualquier intento de desbaratar el “ser” tiene como respuesta inmediata la exclusión violenta de la diferencia: concretamente observamos esto, dialogando tanto con colegas como legos, en la “violencia académica” pero también en la “violencia cotidiana” ¿Cómo salir del cierre metafísico que ha mantenido durante décadas la violencia y exclusión de aquello que se generó en primera instancia, paradójicamente, como argumentación de tolerancia y emancipación? Pensamos que deconstruyendo el discurso de género aristotélico podremos vislumbrar nuevas hipótesis y posiciones ético-políticas que no recurran, para validarse, a la exclusión violenta de nuevos cuerpos-sujetos-géneros. Some critical gender studies do not know their theoretical and political position at the time to developing some of their basic assumptions. This study attempts to explain the ethical consequences that lead to the end some of these theoretical positions. We realize that fundamental works of these studies clearly appropriating, and without knowing it, an aristotelian logic to justify the assumption of material body, the subject and gender. What specifically found in this logic? It is characterized to found on an immovable ontology, where any attempt to disrupt the “being” has as an immediate violent response to exclude the difference: specifically we observe this, dialoguing with colleagues and laymen, in the “academic violence” but also “everyday violence”. How to get out of the metaphysical closure that maintained for decades the violence and exclusion of what is generated in the first place, paradoxically, as argument of tolerance and emancipation? We think deconstructing the aristotelian discourse of gender can warn new hypotheses and ethical positions that not based, to validate, on a violent exclusion of new bodies-subject-genres positions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document