New therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Argüelles Arias

Currently, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is considered an immune-mediated disease. The most widely accepted etiopathogenic hypothesis is that it is due to an inadequate interaction between the immune system and the microorganisms that form the normal intestinal flora. This abnormal interaction occurs in genetically predisposed subjects under the influence of various environmental factors (such as tobacco, diet, stress, or recurrent bacterial infections), which could act as triggers for alterations in the intestinal epithelial barrier. This would lead to an increase in the permeability of barrier, allowing the translocation of microbial products to the wall of the digestive tract, which would activate an acute cell-mediated immune response[1]. The failure of the anti-inflammatory regulatory mechanisms, together with an excess in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, would promote an aberrant immune response that would be self-perpetuating over time, thus giving rise to the chronic inflammation that characterizes IBD[2]. Since the first descriptions of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD), many treatments have been developed, with varying degrees of safety and efficacy. At the end of the 20th century, the first biological, called Infliximab, began to be used. A biological drug is one that has a biotechnological origin and arises from proteins derived from DNA and hybridization processes, which require living organisms as a fundamental part of the production process[3]. Undoubtedly, the appearance of biologics in the therapeutic arsenal of IBD was a very important advance in the treatment of these patients, a true revolution. Until that date, many of the patients who began to be treated with this biologic could only do with corticosteroids or by surgery. These drugs have been shown to be effective in reducing intestinal damage caused by chronic inflammation, the need for surgery and hospital admissions and, consequently, have improved the quality of life of many patients[4]. The demonstrated benefit of these drugs, especially when administered early, as well as their favorable safety profile, have led to their increasingly frequent use in the treatment of patients with IBD. They can be divided into - anti-TNF drugs (blocking the cytokine TNF-α), - Vedolizumab (blocking the integrin α4β7) and - Ustekinumab (blocking Interleukin 12 and 23). Recently, and only for use in UC, Tofacitinib (an inhibitor of the JAK-kinase pathway) has been approved and has demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of moderate-severe active UC[5]. The management of all these drugs represents a challenge for the digestive specialist who must know their mechanisms of action and use them appropriately in patients with IBD. Anti-TNF drugs, being the oldest, are the ones with which we have the most experience and, therefore, they are usually used in the first line in those cases in which conventional drugs (corticosteroids and / or immunosuppressants) have failed. There are three currently marketed in Spain: Infliximab (for intravenous administration), Adalimumab (for subcutaneous administration) and Golimumab (for subcutaneous administration). Vedolizumab (administered intravenously), and Ustekinumab (administered subcutaneously, after a first intravenous administration) are characterized by having an excellent safety profile and a very low immunogenic potential compared to anti-TNF drugs. There are many lines of research currently underway to try to identify the clinical factors of the patient that would make one drug or another more useful in the first line. Other lines seek to identify genetic factors (it seems that mutations in the HLA DQA1 * 05 haplotype could increase immunogenicity to anti-TNF drugs[6]) and also molecular factors[7]. References: [1] Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014; 14(5): 329-342. [2] Zhang YZ, Li YY. Inflammatory bowel disease: Pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(1): 91-99. [3] Pithadia AB, Jain S. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pharmacol Rep. 2011; 63(3): 629-42. [4] Weisshof R, El Jurdi K, Zmeter N, Rubin DT. Emerging Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther. 2018; 35(11): 1746-1762. [5] Boland BS, Vermeire S. Janus Kinase Antagonists and Other Novel Small Molecules for the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2017; 46(3): 627-644. [6] Sazonovs A, Kennedy NA, Moutsianas L, et al. HLA-DQA1*05 Carriage Associated With Development of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Infliximab and Adalimumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158(1): 189-199. [7] Atreya R, Neurath MF. Mechanisms of molecular resistance and predictors of response to biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3(11): 790-802.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Sorleto ◽  
Stefanie Dürrwald ◽  
Marcus Wiemer

Mesalazine- (5-aminosalicylic acid-) containing products are a well-known treatment for inflammatory bowel disease, often as first line. Myocarditis is recognized as a very rare possible side effect of this drug treatment. We present a case of mesalazine-induced myopericarditis that was successfully improved by immediate cessation of the medication.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 783-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha G. Nair ◽  
Russell R. Cross

AbstractMesalamine-containing products are considered first-line treatment for inflammatory bowel disease. Myocarditis is recognised as a very rare possible side effect of these medications, but has not often been described in the paediatric population. We present a case of an adolescent with Crohn’s disease who presented with myopericarditis after recent initiation of Pentasa. Once identified as the causative agent, the drug was discontinued, with subsequent normalisation of troponin and improvement of function. This case identifies the importance of prompt evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of paediatric patients receiving mesalamine-containing medications that present with significant cardiovascular symptoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Cunha Gonzaga LIMA ◽  
Natália Sousa Freitas QUEIROZ ◽  
Carlos Walter SOBRADO ◽  
Gustavo Luís Rodela SILVA ◽  
Sérgio Carlos NAHAS

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic immune-mediated diseases that present a relapsing and remitting course and requires long-term treatment. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has changed the management of the disease by reducing the need for hospitalizations, surgeries and improving patient´s quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to discuss the role of anti-TNF agents in IBD, highlighting the situations where its use as first-line therapy would be appropriate. METHODS: Narrative review summarizing the best available evidence on the topic based on searches in databases such as MedLine and PubMed up to April 2020 using the following keywords: “inflammatory bowel disease’’, “anti-TNF agents” and ‘’biologic therapy’’. CONCLUSION: Biological therapy remains the cornerstone in the treatment of IBD. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, the choice of the biological agent may be challenging and should take into account several variables. Anti-TNF agents should be considered as first line therapy in specific scenarios such as acute severe ulcerative colitis, fistulizing Crohn’s disease and extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, given the strong body of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in these situations.


1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 413-416
Author(s):  
Charles N Bernstein

For several decades corticosteroids were the only potent immunomodulatory agents effective and available for active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The past decade ha seen an enhanced knowledge of the immune response in lBD and a better understanding of how common immunomodulatory agents work. Furthermore, more specific mediators of the abnormal immune response have been identified, so that therapy can be more targeted. Purine analogues have proven efficacy in achieving and maintaining remission in both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Methotrexate has proven efficacy in active Crohn’s disease. Both of these classes of drugs requires weeks to months of treatment before any benefit is seen. Intravenous cyclosporine is efficacious in acute severe ulcerative colitis and can settle active disease within days of administration. It is unclear whether oral cyclosporine offers any advantage at maintaining remission, once achieved. Oral cyclosporine in Crohn’s disease has been proven to be ineffective at either achieving or maintaining remission; however, intravenous cyclosporine in Crohn’s disease has not been rigorously tested. Newer immunomodulatory agents have been designed for specific targets. and in particular monoclonal antibodies that block the effects of interleukin-1, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and the T cell receptor are available for clinical trials. We are in an era of expanding therapeutic approaches to these diseases, including the refined use of readily available agent, the development of newer, more targeted agents and a broader understanding of how agents may be effectively used simultaneously or sequentially.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S11-S12
Author(s):  
Magdalena Grzegorczyk ◽  
Maryla Kuczynska ◽  
Karolina Siejka ◽  
Monika Zbroja ◽  
Weronika Cyranka ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Crohn’s disease is classified as chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The incidence in Europe ranges from 1 to almost 11.4 per 100,000 population per year. Ultrasound examination plays an important role in imaging diagnostics of inflammatory bowel lesions. It allows for assessing response to therapy as well as recognizing possible penetrating complications of the disease, i.e. fistula or abscess. Materials and Methods 36 children were included in the study: 16 boys and 20 girls with an active phase of Crohn’s disease. Each patient underwent intestinal ultrasound examination with a high frequency 7–12 Mhz linear probe. Results In all patients US examination depicted thickened, hypoechoic ileal wall showing patterns of vascularization. In 8 patients Bauhin’ valve edema was visible. In 16 children, inflammatory infiltration of the periintestinal fat around the affected segment of the intestine was found. In addition, all patients presented mesenteric lymphadenopathy with short-axis diameter of 10–15 mm. 8 patients had penetrating complications of Crohn’s disease: 4 small intestine fistulas and 4 abscesses. Conclusion Given its safety profile and diagnostic efficacy, US examination should be considered as the first-line imaging modality for assessing inflammatory bowel disease in children. US proved to be a reliable and easily accessible tool in the diagnosis of enteric inflammatory lesions, evaluating CD activity and assessing potential penetrating complications of the disease.


1988 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Briele ◽  
F. Wolf ◽  
H. J. Biersack ◽  
F. F. Knapp ◽  
A. Hotze

A prospective study was initiated to compare the clinically proven results concerning localization/extent and activity of inflammatory bowel diseases with those of 111ln-oxine leukocyte imaging. All patients studied were completely examined with barium enema x-ray, clinical and laboratory investigations, and endoscopy with histopathology. A total of 31 leukocyte scans were performed in 15 patients (12 with Crohn’s disease, 3 with ulcerative colitis). The scans were graded by comparing the cell uptake of a lesion (when present) and a bone marrow area providing a count ratio (CR). The inflammatory lesions were correctly localized on 26 leukocyte scans, and in 21 scans the scintigraphically estimated extent of disease was identical to endoscopy. In 5 cases the disease extent was underestimated, 4 scans in patients with relapse of Crohn’s disease were falsely negative, and in one patient with remission truly negative. The scintigraphically assessed disease activity was also in a good agreement with clinical disease activity based on histopathology in all cases. We conclude that leukocyte imaging provides valuable information about localization and activity of inflammatory bowel disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maliha Naseer ◽  
Shiva Poola ◽  
Syed Ali ◽  
Sami Samiullah ◽  
Veysel Tahan

The incidence, prevalence, and cost of care associated with diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease are on the rise. The role of gut microbiota in the causation of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis has not been established yet. Nevertheless, several animal models and human studies point towards the association. Targeting intestinal dysbiosis for remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention is an attractive treatment approach with minimal adverse effects. However, the data is still conflicting. The purpose of this article is to provide the most comprehensive and updated review on the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of active Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis/pouchitis and their role in the remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention. A thorough literature review was performed on PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE using the terms “prebiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “probiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “prebiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND acute pouchitis”, “probiotics AND chronic pouchitis” and “prebiotics AND pouchitis”. Observational studies and clinical trials conducted on humans and published in the English language were included. A total of 71 clinical trials evaluating the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of inflammatory bowel disease were reviewed and the findings were summarized. Most of these studies on probiotics evaluated lactobacillus, De Simone Formulation or Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and there is some evidence supporting these agents for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis and prevention of pouchitis relapse with minimal adverse effects. The efficacy of prebiotics such as fructooligosaccharides and Plantago ovata seeds in ulcerative colitis are inconclusive and the data regarding the utility of prebiotics in pouchitis is limited. The results of the clinical trials for remission induction and maintenance in active Crohn's disease or post-operative relapse with probiotics and prebiotics are inadequate and not very convincing. Prebiotics and probiotics are safe, effective and have great therapeutic potential. However, better designed clinical trials in the multicenter setting with a large sample and long duration of intervention are needed to identify the specific strain or combination of probiotics and prebiotics which will be more beneficial and effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burton I Korelitz ◽  
Judy Schneider

Abstract We present a bird’s eye view of the prognosis for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease as contained in the database of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease gastroenterologist covering the period from 1950 until the present utilizing the variables of medical therapy, surgical intervention, complications and deaths by decades.


Author(s):  
Shinichiro Shinzaki ◽  
Katsuyoshi Matsuoka ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Fuminao Takeshima ◽  
Shingo Kato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This multicenter prospective study (UMIN000019958) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of serum leucin-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) levels in monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Patients with moderate-to-severe IBD initiated on adalimumab therapy were enrolled herein. Serum LRG, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (fCal) levels were measured at week 0, 12, 24, and 52. Colonoscopy was performed at week 0, 12, and 52 for ulcerative colitis (UC), and at week 0, 24, and 52 for Crohn’s disease (CD). Endoscopic activity was assessed using the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) for CD and the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) for UC. Results A total of 81 patients was enrolled. Serum LRG levels decreased along with improvements in clinical and endoscopic outcomes upon adalimumab treatment (27.4 ± 12.6 μg/ml at week 0, 15.5 ± 7.7 μg/ml at week 12, 15.7 ± 9.6 μg/ml at week 24, and 14.5 ± 6.8 μg/ml at week 52), being correlated with endoscopic activity at each time point (SES-CD: r = 0.391 at week 0, r = 0.563 at week 24, r = 0.697 at week 52; MES: r = 0.534 at week 0, r = 0.429 at week 12, r = 0.335 at week 52). Endoscopic activity better correlated with LRG compared to CRP and fCal on pooled analysis at all time points (SES-CD: LRG: r = 0.636, CRP: r = 0.402, fCal: r = 0.435; MES: LRG: r = 0.568, CRP: 0.389, fCal: r = 0.426). Conclusions Serum LRG is a useful biomarker of endoscopic activity both in CD and UC during the adalimumab treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document