CHINA’S HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT: POLICY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The article is devoted to the study of individual directions and trends in the development of Russian-Chinese relations in the field of education. Topicality of the research is stipulated by necessity of organizational reforming of higher education system in the direction of perspectives of cooperation between Russia and China that presupposes study and comparative analysis of educational systems of considered countries. The article is devoted to the study of some trends and tendencies in the development of Russian-Chinese relations in the field of education. The specifics of the development of integration of educational space of Russia and China on the example of border regions: Heilongjiang Province and the Far East are considered. The method of comparative analysis was used to identify the specifics of higher education in China and the Russian Federation. Mutual benefit and mutual expediency were indicated as criteria for cooperation of both countries in the field of education. The features of higher education development in Heilongjiang Province and in the Russian Far East were described. An analysis of higher education development in the Russian Far East as assessed by Chinese experts is given. The results of a study by Chinese scholars on the preferences of Russian youth are presented. The key areas of effective joint solution to the problem of training a globally competitive professional are identified. The conclusions can be used in developing plans for cooperation between Russia and China in the sphere of higher education.

Download Full-text

POWERPOINT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: DEVELOPMENT, TRANSFORMATION AND THE PRESENT STATE

Educational Psychology in Polycultural Space ◽

10.24888/2073-8439-2021-54-2-97-103 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 54 (2) ◽

pp. 97-103

Author(s):

Alexander R. Polyanin ◽

◽

Sergey N. Korotun ◽

Dmitry A. Baranov ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Present State ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Empirical Studies ◽

Education Development ◽

Technical Application ◽

Higher Education Development ◽

Marketing Environment ◽

Classroom Time ◽

Education Process

PowerPoint appeared over 35 years ago and has taken a firm place in education. The massive use of the program began in the mid-90s. The program has gone from an interesting technological novelty to an irreplaceable element of a modern lecture. Such a rapid introduction into ed-ucation took place without extensive empirical studies of a positive impact of this program, the initial scope of which was the marketing environment, on the education process. The article in-dicates that PowerPoint already in the late 1990s was subjected to certain criticism, the initial reasons for which were its technological imperfection, problems of its technical application. Over the decades, the program has undergone a number of modernizations, which, together with the development of demonstration technologies, has brought it today to a qualitatively new level. However, even today PowerPoint continues to raise questions from researchers. A sepa-rate problem was the question of the expediency of such massive use of the program, which today seeks to fill 100% of the classroom time. Most of the guides for using the program do not take into account the specifics of the use of slides and are aimed at the implementation of design rather than pedagogical tasks. The problem of stimulating audience activity at lectures using this program has not been solved yet.

Download Full-text

The Debate on Private Higher Education Development in China

Private Higher Education ◽

10.1163/9789087901035_026 ◽

2005 ◽

pp. 117-120

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Private Higher Education ◽

Education Development ◽

Higher Education Development

Download Full-text

China Calls for Smarter Standards for Its World-Class Universities

International Higher Education ◽

10.6017/ihe.2016.86.9363 ◽

2016 ◽

pp. 10-11 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Qiang Zha

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Education Development ◽

Higher Education Development ◽

Class Standing ◽

Chinese Characteristics ◽

World Class ◽

World Class Universities

China recently launched a new stage of world-class university campaign, and emphasized developing the “Chinese characteristics” this time. Arguably, global rankings remain the most powerful illustration of who can claim world-class standing, which in turn renders the “Chinese characteristics” in question. This article argues that China would benefit from a kind of explicit “Chinese standards” to help establish a clearer direction for higher education development in the country.

Download Full-text

The Complex Diversity of Southeast Asian Postsecondary Education

International Higher Education ◽

10.6017/ihe.2017.88.9687 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 16-18

Author(s):

Philip G. Altbach

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Southeast Asia ◽

Postsecondary Education ◽

Southeast Asian ◽

Education Development ◽

Higher Education Development ◽

The Many

Higher education in Southeast Asia constitutes a complex mosaic of cultures, languages, and academic traditions. This article argues that while there are some similarities, the many variations make it difficult to generalize about the region or to create a common approach to higher education development.

Download Full-text

Historical and Paradigmatic Development of Educational Processes in Ukraine: Author’s Substantiation

Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal ◽

10.5817/cphpj-2020-031 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 176-188

Author(s):

Natalia Demyanenko

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

Education Development ◽

Higher Education Development ◽

Educational Processes

The process of higher education development in Ukraine of the 19 – beginning of 21 century in the unity of academic, professionally oriented, vocationally-technological and humanitarian paradigmatic directions is founded. Major trends and characteristics of each of them are identified. It is proved that modern humanitarian pedagogical paradigm does not cancel the previous paradigms but ensures their implementation on a qualitatively new level. The development of higher education doesn’t occur in terms of leveling and replacement of existing paradigmatic direction by another one, but in the context of their coexistence, and in the condition of each next paradigm dominance on a new stage of society development.

Download Full-text