scholarly journals An Introduction on Interpretable Machine Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7S) ◽  
pp. 107-111
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Accuracy Score ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Ethical Practices ◽  
Interpretable Machine Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Machine Learning Applications ◽  
Machine Learning Models

As Artificial Intelligence penetrates all aspects of human life, more and more questions about ethical practices and fair uses arise, which has motivated the research community to look inside and develop methods to interpret these Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning models. This concept of interpretability can not only help with the ethical questions but also can provide various insights into the working of these machine learning models, which will become crucial in trust-building and understanding how a model makes decisions. Furthermore, in many machine learning applications, the feature of interpretability is the primary value that they offer. However, in practice, many developers select models based on the accuracy score and disregarding the level of interpretability of that model, which can be chaotic as predictions by many high accuracy models are not easily explainable. In this paper, we introduce the concept of Machine Learning Model Interpretability, Interpretable Machine learning, and the methods used for interpretation and explanations.

Deep Learning Applications in Medical Imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 178-208
Author(s):  
S. Sasikala ◽  
S. J. Subhashini ◽  
P. Alli ◽  
J. Jane Rubel Angelina
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Medical Imaging ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Driving System ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Car Driving ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Machine learning is a technique of parsing data, learning from that data, and then applying what has been learned to make informed decisions. Deep learning is actually a subset of machine learning. It technically is machine learning and functions in the same way, but it has different capabilities. The main difference between deep and machine learning is, machine learning models become well progressively, but the model still needs some guidance. If a machine learning model returns an inaccurate prediction, then the programmer needs to fix that problem explicitly, but in the case of deep learning, the model does it by itself. Automatic car driving system is a good example of deep learning. On other hand, Artificial Intelligence is a different thing from machine learning and deep learning. Deep learning and machine learning both are the subsets of AI.

scholarly journals Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Pantelis Linardatos ◽  
Vasilis Papastefanopoulos ◽  
Sotiris Kotsiantis
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Learning Systems ◽  
Model Complexity ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Industrial Adoption ◽  
Machine Learning Models ◽  
The Way

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to its widespread industrial adoption, with machine learning systems demonstrating superhuman performance in a significant number of tasks. However, this surge in performance, has often been achieved through increased model complexity, turning such systems into “black box” approaches and causing uncertainty regarding the way they operate and, ultimately, the way that they come to decisions. This ambiguity has made it problematic for machine learning systems to be adopted in sensitive yet critical domains, where their value could be immense, such as healthcare. As a result, scientific interest in the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), a field that is concerned with the development of new methods that explain and interpret machine learning models, has been tremendously reignited over recent years. This study focuses on machine learning interpretability methods; more specifically, a literature review and taxonomy of these methods are presented, as well as links to their programming implementations, in the hope that this survey would serve as a reference point for both theorists and practitioners.

Application of interpretable machine learning models for the intelligent decision

2019 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yawen Li ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Bohan Yang ◽  
Ning Wang ◽  
Tian Wu
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Interpretable Machine Learning ◽  
Intelligent Decision ◽  
Machine Learning Models

scholarly journals Comparison of machine learning models based on time domain and frequency domain features for faults diagnosis in rotating machines

2018 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 17009
Author(s):  
Natalia Espinoza Sepulveda ◽  
Jyoti Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Frequency Domain ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Intelligent Systems ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Machine Vibration ◽  
Vibration Data ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
The Time Domain ◽  
Machine Learning Models

The development of technologies for the maintenance industry has taken an important role to meet the demanding challenges. One of the important challenges is to predict the defects, if any, in machines as early as possible to manage the machines downtime. The vibration-based condition monitoring (VCM) is well-known for this purpose but requires the human experience and expertise. The machine learning models using the intelligent systems and pattern recognition seem to be the future avenue for machine fault detection without the human expertise. Several such studies are published in the literature. This paper is also on the machine learning model for the different machine faults classification and detection. Here the time domain and frequency domain features derived from the measured machine vibration data are used separated in the development of the machine learning models using the artificial neutral network method. The effectiveness of both the time and frequency domain features based models are compared when they are applied to an experimental rig. The paper presents the proposed machine learning models and their performance in terms of the observations and results.

scholarly journals Automated Retraining of Machine Learning Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 445-452
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Input Data ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Crucial Component ◽  
Conventional Machine ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Data is the most crucial component of a successful ML system. Once a machine learning model is developed, it gets obsolete over time due to presence of new input data being generated every second. In order to keep our predictions accurate we need to find a way to keep our models up to date. Our research work involves finding a mechanism which can retrain the model with new data automatically. This research also involves exploring the possibilities of automating machine learning processes. We started this project by training and testing our model using conventional machine learning methods. The outcome was then compared with the outcome of those experiments conducted using the AutoML methods like TPOT. This helped us in finding an efficient technique to retrain our models. These techniques can be used in areas where people do not deal with the actual working of a ML model but only require the outputs of ML processes

Train Deep Learning Models using subsurface geological images datasets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy Abdallah ◽  
Clare E. Bond ◽  
Robert W.H. Butler
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Structural Interpretation ◽  
Performance Accuracy ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Machine Learning Models

<p>Machine learning is being presented as a new solution for a wide range of geoscience problems. Primarily machine learning has been used for 3D seismic data processing, seismic facies analysis and well log data correlation. The rapid development in technology with open-source artificial intelligence libraries and the accessibility of affordable computer graphics processing units (GPU) makes the application of machine learning in geosciences increasingly tractable. However, the application of artificial intelligence in structural interpretation workflows of subsurface datasets is still ambiguous. This study aims to use machine learning techniques to classify images of folds and fold-thrust structures. Here we show that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as supervised deep learning techniques provide excellent algorithms to discriminate between geological image datasets. Four different datasets of images have been used to train and test the machine learning models. These four datasets are a seismic character dataset with five classes (faults, folds, salt, flat layers and basement), folds types with three classes (buckle, chevron and conjugate), fault types with three classes (normal, reverse and thrust) and fold-thrust geometries with three classes (fault bend fold, fault propagation fold and detachment fold). These image datasets are used to investigate three machine learning models. One Feedforward linear neural network model and two convolutional neural networks models (Convolution 2d layer transforms sequential model and Residual block model (ResNet with 9, 34, and 50 layers)). Validation and testing datasets forms a critical part of testing the model’s performance accuracy. The ResNet model records the highest performance accuracy score, of the machine learning models tested. Our CNN image classification model analysis provides a framework for applying machine learning to increase structural interpretation efficiency, and shows that CNN classification models can be applied effectively to geoscience problems. The study provides a starting point to apply unsupervised machine learning approaches to sub-surface structural interpretation workflows.</p>

Recent Progress in Quantum Machine Learning

2021 ◽  
pp. 232-256
Author(s):  
Amandeep Singh Bhatia ◽  
Renata Wong
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Recent Progress ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Exciting Field ◽  
Quantum Machine Learning ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Quantum computing is a new exciting field which can be exploited to great speed and innovation in machine learning and artificial intelligence. Quantum machine learning at crossroads explores the interaction between quantum computing and machine learning, supplementing each other to create models and also to accelerate existing machine learning models predicting better and accurate classifications. The main purpose is to explore methods, concepts, theories, and algorithms that focus and utilize quantum computing features such as superposition and entanglement to enhance the abilities of machine learning computations enormously faster. It is a natural goal to study the present and future quantum technologies with machine learning that can enhance the existing classical algorithms. The objective of this chapter is to facilitate the reader to grasp the key components involved in the field to be able to understand the essentialities of the subject and thus can compare computations of quantum computing with its counterpart classical machine learning algorithms.

Research Methods to Study and Empower Crowd Workers

2021 ◽  
pp. 164-184
Author(s):  
Saiph Savage ◽  
Carlos Toxtli ◽  
Eber Betanzos-Torres
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Real World ◽  
Intelligent Systems ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Professional Goals ◽  
Career Growth ◽  
Machine Learning Models

The artificial intelligence (AI) industry has created new jobs that are essential to the real world deployment of intelligent systems. Part of the job focuses on labelling data for machine learning models or having workers complete tasks that AI alone cannot do. These workers are usually known as ‘crowd workers’—they are part of a large distributed crowd that is jointly (but separately) working on the tasks although they are often invisible to end-users, leading to workers often being paid below minimum wage and having limited career growth. In this chapter, we draw upon the field of human–computer interaction to provide research methods for studying and empowering crowd workers. We present our Computational Worker Leagues which enable workers to work towards their desired professional goals and also supply quantitative information about crowdsourcing markets. This chapter demonstrates the benefits of this approach and highlights important factors to consider when researching the experiences of crowd workers.

Improving Logging Prediction on Imbalanced Datasets

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeeta Lal ◽  
Neetu Sardana ◽  
Ashish Sureka
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Class Imbalance ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class Imbalance Problem ◽  
Imbalanced Datasets ◽  
Imbalance Problem ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Logging is an important yet tough decision for OSS developers. Machine-learning models are useful in improving several steps of OSS development, including logging. Several recent studies propose machine-learning models to predict logged code construct. The prediction performances of these models are limited due to the class-imbalance problem since the number of logged code constructs is small as compared to non-logged code constructs. No previous study analyzes the class-imbalance problem for logged code construct prediction. The authors first analyze the performances of J48, RF, and SVM classifiers for catch-blocks and if-blocks logged code constructs prediction on imbalanced datasets. Second, the authors propose LogIm, an ensemble and threshold-based machine-learning model. Third, the authors evaluate the performance of LogIm on three open-source projects. On average, LogIm model improves the performance of baseline classifiers, J48, RF, and SVM, by 7.38%, 9.24%, and 4.6% for catch-blocks, and 12.11%, 14.95%, and 19.13% for if-blocks logging prediction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document