scholarly journals The Impact of Board Composition on Firm Performance with Reference to Selected Indian Companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 2818-2824
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Women Directors ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Size Number ◽  
The Impact

This study examines effects of board composition on firm performance among 24 selected companies which are listed on the National Stock Exchange. It strives to understand the influence of corporate governance by testing 3 variables of board composition namely – board size, number of independent directors and the number of female directors on a company’s profitability measured through the tool – Tobin’s Q. One-way Anova test is used to establish a relationship between each of the three variables of board composition with firm profits. The study is conducted over a period of 5 years from 2013 to 2018 and concentrates on the following sectors - Auto, Financial Services, FMCG, IT, Media, Metal, Pharma, and Realty. The results revealed a significant relationship between board size and number of independent directors with firm profits which meant a firm with a greater sized board or more independent directors also showed higher profits in comparison. While, no significant relationship was found between the number of women directors on a firms’ board and firm performance.

scholarly journals Influence of Board Size and Independence on Firm Performance: A Study of Indian Companies

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumars Garg
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Good Deal ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
The Impact

Corporate governance issues have attracted a good deal of public interest because of their apparent importance for the economic health of corporations and society in general, especially after the plethora of corporate scams and debacles in recent times. Corporate governance issues flow from the concept of accountability and governance and assume greater significance and magnitude in the case of corporate form of organization where the ownership and management of organizations are distanced. And, it is in this context that the pivotal role played by the board of directors in maintaining an effective organization assumes much importance. A major part of the debate on corporate governance centres around board composition especially board size and independence. Various committees have mandated a minimum number of independent directors and have given guidelines on board composition. However, the relationship of board characteristics such as composition, size, and independence with performance has not yet been established. This paper addresses this question: Does the board size and independence really matter in terms of influencing firm's performance? The findings suggest that: There is an inverse association between board size and firm performance. Different proportions of board independence have dissimilar impact on firm performance. The impact of board independence on firm performance is more when the board independence is between 50 and 60 per cent. Smaller boards are more efficient than the larger ones, the board size limit of six suggested as the ideal. Independent directors have so far failed to perform their monitoring role effectively and improve the performance of the firm. The guidelines on corporate governance should take into account the ‘cross-board’ phenomenon while defining the criteria for eligibility for appointment as an independent director. Lack of training to function as independent directors and ignorance of the procedures, tasks, and responsibilities expected of them could be reasons for the independent directors' non-performance. A bad performance leads to an increase in board size, which in turn, hampers performance. Guidelines are provided for future studies to include different variables to see which board composition is suitable for different companies at different stages of life cycle.

scholarly journals Are All Independent Directors the Same? Evidence from Italian Listed Companies

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Paolo Tenuta ◽  
Domenico Rocco Cambrea ◽  
Debora Fazzari
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Female Directors ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of independent directors on the performance of Italian listed firms on the Milan Stock Exchange during the period 2006-2015. After applying a Fixed Effect Model, the empirical findings suggest that the composition of the board may affect corporate performances and, more specifically, a significant relationship emerges between the presence of independent directors within the Board and company results. Specifically, independent directors and independent female directors positively affect firm performance. Diversely, independent busy directors, those with hold more than three directorship in other boards, do not affect performance.

The effects of board size and board composition on CSR disclosure: a study of banking sectors in Bangladesh

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Abdur Rouf ◽  
Md. Alamgir Hossan
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Female Directors ◽  
The Government ◽  
Csr Disclosure

Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide a profound understanding of the nature and extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the annual report by the listed banking sectors in Bangladesh for examining the effect of board size and board composition on CSR disclosure. Design/methodology/approach The sample selected of all the 30 listed banks enlisted in the Dhaka Stock Exchange and the study used a content analysis approach. An ordinary least square regression model is fitted to the data for assessing the effect of independent variables on the total CSR disclosure score. An un-weighted approach has been used for this study. Findings The results of the study demonstrate that the extent of CSR disclosure of listed banks in Bangladesh varies from 11.11% to 73.33%, and on average, they report 45.37% and 43.44%, respectively. Moreover, the study observed a significant relationship between the proportion of female directors and CSR disclosure. Conversely, board size has been found no significant relationship with the CSR disclosure but the proportion of independent directors has been found a significant relationship with the CSR disclosure in the annual report by the listed banking sectors in Bangladesh. Social implications The study is expected to get a maximum scenario of CSR disclosure of banking sectors in Bangladesh. Government and other regulatory bodies can also get full information concerning CSR disclosure practices for formulating guidelines in this regard. If the Government of Bangladesh implicates the policies that the banks are to nominate a required number of female directors to boards, the consideration of the significant number of female directors and their power will be able to protect the interests of different stakeholder groups notably. Originality/value The study contributes to the CSR literature as it presents empirical evidence of the effects of board size and board composition on the CSR disclosure of banking sectors in developing countries such as Bangladesh.

The impact of VC backing on the corporate governance of Chinese IPOs

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing (Sophie) Wang ◽  
Hamish D. Anderson ◽  
Jing Chi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Shareholder Protection ◽  
Political Ties ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Industry Experience

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how venture capital (VC) backing influences the board size and independence and how VC backing and board structure impact firm performance in China. Design/methodology/approach Using hand-collected data from 924 initial public offering (IPO) prospectuses covering the period from January 2004 to December 2012, the authors investigate the impact of VC backing on board size, board independence and firm market performance through regression analysis. A two-stage approach is also used to address the endogeneity issue. Findings The authors find robust evidence that VC-backed IPOs have more independent boards, after controlling for CEO and firm characteristics, and the potential endogeneity concerns. Furthermore, firms backed by VCs with management political ties (PTs) have more independent directors with industry relevant expertise than other firms. While no significant relationship is found between board independence and firm performance, the authors present some evidence that IPOs which have a larger percentage of independent directors with industry relevant expertise exhibit higher long-term stock returns, and VCs with management PTs also improve IPO long-run stock performance. Research limitations/implications Although VC is new in China and the Chinese capital market has relative poor corporate governance and weak minority shareholder protection, the authors find support in this paper that VC backing is valuable to IPO firms in China not only through providing funding but also by providing political ties and industry experience. However, Chinese regulatory and institutional settings have strong impact on test results and they change rapidly, so the results may not apply to other period in Chinese markets. Originality/value This paper sheds lights on the influences of VC backing on corporate governance and firm performance in a transitional and emerging economy. It discovers the value of VC investors in a transitional economy as of providing political ties and industry experience. The new definition of independent directors suggested by Suchard (2009) is first used by our paper in the Chinese context.

scholarly journals CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE NEXUS: A CASE OF CEMENT INDUSTRY OF PAKISTAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Ghafoor Kazi ◽  
Muhammad Asad Arain ◽  
Payal Devi Sahetiya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Cement Industry ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
The Impact

Corporate governance is the system of rules, practices and method by that business corporations are directed and controlled. The aim of this research is to examine the impact of the corporate governance on the financial performance of the enlisted cement industry on the Pakistan Stock Exchange from the year 2013-17. This research is a “quantitative research” which focuses on numbers and results based on empirical analysis of actual data and logic. Ten out of seventeen cement firms listed at PSX from the period 2013-17 are selected as sample of the study. Data was collected from documents and records. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and multiple regressions were used for data analysis. The results showed that there is no significant relationship between leverage and firm performance, the board structure has no significant relationship with firm performance, and firm size has an insignificant relationship with firm performance. The results however suggested that ownership structure has significant relationship with firm performance. The future investors in cement industry of Pakistan must consider above factors before investments. This study helps shareholders and management in decision making about the effect of ownership structure on firm performance and how these can change ownership structure. This study helps students to gain knowledge and understanding about good corporate governance and its impact on firm performance. It will also help them to go through the annual reports of companies and to analyse the financial statements so that they could learn how to analyse the performance of the firm in terms of ROE. Moreover, the study would also be a direction for future researchers and students to further add value to the subject of corporate governance and firm performance.

Does Governance Structure Matter In Post-Spinoff?

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Norazlan Alias ◽  
Mohd Hasimi Yaacob ◽  
Nahariah Jaffar
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Debt Ratio ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Size Number

This study examines corporate governance role in the post spinoff from the perspective of the new entity or spinoff firm. Using yearly data of Bursa Malaysia (formerly known as Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange) listed firms that announced and completed their spinoff exercises, for the period of 1994 to 2015. We focused on the new entity or spinoff firm's governance structure represented by board size, number of independent director and director's ownership. No variables were significant in direct effect term but the number of independent directors and percentage of directors' ownership respectively interact positively significant with debt ratio on firm performance measured by return on assets (ROA). This study recommends more board of directors' ownership and independent directors respectively for the new entity to optimize its capital structure policy as reflected in firm's debt ratio as shown by an increase in firm performance following a spinoff. In other words, an increase in board of directors'ownership and independent directors in board composition would negate risk associated with increasing debt in firm's capital structure. Keywords: Board Structure, Ownership Structure, Spinoff

scholarly journals Pengaruh atribut tata kelola dan karakteristik perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen pada perusahaan di BEI

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-215
Author(s):  
Serly Serly ◽  
Mery Susanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Independent Director ◽  
Women Directors ◽  
Firm Characteristics ◽  
Board Meeting ◽  
Board Size ◽  
The Impact

The dividend was a kind of return from portfolio investment. Firms in making dividend payment decisions are influenced by several motives. The main topic of the research was to determine the impact of corporate governance and firm characteristics on the decision of dividend policy. In here, corporate governance was focused on board characteristics consisting of board size, independent director, board meeting frequency, woman director, and audit committee size. While the firm characteristics were measured by size, profitability (ROA), and leverage. The research used companies data collected from Indonesia Stock Exchange. Companies data must available from the period 2015-2019 and resulted in 2.175 sample data. The research used the panel regression method. The result of the research proved that board size and profitability (ROA) significantly positively influenced the dividend policy. Board meeting frequency showed a positive effect on dividend per share, but no effect on dividend per asset. Otherwise, women directors and leverage reflected a significant negative effect with dividend per assets, but an insignificant effect on dividend per share. On the other hand, firm size, independent director, and audit committee size did not have any significant impact on dividend policy decisions.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Firms Listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamad Yuosef Alhumoudi
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Ceo Duality ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

This study examines whether implementation of internal CG mechanisms have affected the performance of non-financial firms listed on the Saudi stock exchange “Tadawul”, since the implementation of Saudi CG code. A cross-sectional regression analysis is employed on a sample of 118 non-financial Saudi firms in 2014, to test the hypotheses set out in the study. Board characteristics assessed include, board size, board composition, board meetings and CEO duality. Ownership structures include managerial and concentrated ownership. The study's empirical findings show board size and CEO duality, are amongst those board characteristics with a positive influence on firm performance. In the case of the second internal mechanisms of CG ownership structures, the findings suggest only managerial ownership positively affects performance. The study findings conclude that CG structures differ in every country, as each has its own social and regulations situation. The study contributes to existing literature about the CG in Saudi Arabia by reviewing the impact of CG practices eight years after the CGC. It enhances understanding among practitioners of CG, and explains how it influences firm performance in Saudi.

scholarly journals Risk Management Committee Attributes and Firm Performance

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basiru Salisu Kallamu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Market Valuation ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Management Committee ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Risk Management Committee

We investigate the impact of risk management committee attributes on firm performance for a sample of 37 finance companies listed on the Malaysian stock exchange covering period from 2007 financial year to 2011. The result indicates that a committee composed of majority independent directors positively enhances firm market valuation and negatively affects accounting returns. Independent committee chair was found to positively enhance accounting returns while prior executive experience of directors enhances both accounting returns and market valuation of the companies. Lastly, presence of executive on RMC shows a significant negative relationship with ROA. The result supports agency theory which suggests that independent directors are in a better position to monitor the executive and protect the interest of the various stakeholders. In addition, the result suggests that regulatory agencies should consider recommending finance companies to have directors with prior executive experience to serve on risk management committee.

scholarly journals Women On Boards Of Directors: Effects On Firm Social Performance In The Basic Materials And Financial Services Sectors

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mel E. Schnake ◽  
Robert J. Williams ◽  
William Fredenberger
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
Female Directors ◽  
Women On Boards ◽  
The Impact

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 34.2pt 0pt 0.5in;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This study examined relationships between the number of female board members, board tenure, and board size on the number of 10K investigations that were instigated against<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>firms in the basic materials and financial services sectors of the economy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>After controlling for the effects of firm size, we found evidence of an interaction effect between the number of female directors and average board tenure for firms in the financial services sector, such that a higher number of women on boards coupled with longer average board tenure results in higher firm social performance (i.e., the fewer the number of 10K investigations brought against the firm).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>No link was found between female directors and average board tenure for the basic materials firms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Further, no interactive patterns were observed between female directors and board size in either sector.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Our findings suggest that future board research may benefit from a &ldquo;contingency approach,&rdquo; as this study has provided some evidence that the relationships between board characteristics and firm performance may not be generalizable from one sector to another.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Future research should carefully consider how the sector or industry may affect the impact of board characteristics on firm performance.</span></span></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document