scholarly journals Getting it right: the roles of research, stakeholders, and delivery for a seasonal streamflow forecasting service across Australia

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

scholarly journals Seasonal streamflow forecasting by conditioning climatology with precipitation indices

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1573-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Maria-Helena Ramos ◽  
Florian Pappenberger ◽  
Charles Perrin
Keyword(s):  
Long Range ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Drought Risk ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Precipitation Indices ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Prediction Approach ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Many fields, such as drought-risk assessment or reservoir management, can benefit from long-range streamflow forecasts. Climatology has long been used in long-range streamflow forecasting. Conditioning methods have been proposed to select or weight relevant historical time series from climatology. They are often based on general circulation model (GCM) outputs that are specific to the forecast date due to the initialisation of GCMs on current conditions. This study investigates the impact of conditioning methods on the performance of seasonal streamflow forecasts. Four conditioning statistics based on seasonal forecasts of cumulative precipitation and the standardised precipitation index were used to select relevant traces within historical streamflows and precipitation respectively. This resulted in eight conditioned streamflow forecast scenarios. These scenarios were compared to the climatology of historical streamflows, the ensemble streamflow prediction approach and the streamflow forecasts obtained from ECMWF System 4 precipitation forecasts. The impact of conditioning was assessed in terms of forecast sharpness (spread), reliability, overall performance and low-flow event detection. Results showed that conditioning past observations on seasonal precipitation indices generally improves forecast sharpness, but may reduce reliability, with respect to climatology. Conversely, conditioned ensembles were more reliable but less sharp than streamflow forecasts derived from System 4 precipitation. Forecast attributes from conditioned and unconditioned ensembles are illustrated for a case of drought-risk forecasting: the 2003 drought in France. In the case of low-flow forecasting, conditioning results in ensembles that can better assess weekly deficit volumes and durations over a wider range of lead times.

Monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasting of large dryland catchments in Brazil

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-223
Author(s):  
Alexandre C. Costa ◽  
Alvson B. S. Estacio ◽  
Francisco de A. de Souza Filho ◽  
Iran E. Lima Neto
Keyword(s):  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

A Seasonal Streamflow Forecasting Model Using Neurofuzzy Network

2000 ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ballini ◽  
M. Figueiredo ◽  
S. Soares ◽  
M. Andrade ◽  
F. Gomide
Keyword(s):  
Forecasting Model ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

scholarly journals Bias correcting precipitation forecasts to improve the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
M.-H. Ramos ◽  
Florian Pappenberger
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Linear Scaling ◽  
Drought Risk ◽  
Seasonal Precipitation ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Distribution Mapping ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Meteorological centres make sustained efforts to provide seasonal forecasts that are increasingly skilful, which has the potential to benefit streamflow forecasting. Seasonal streamflow forecasts can help to take anticipatory measures for a range of applications, such as water supply or hydropower reservoir operation and drought risk management. This study assesses the skill of seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts in France to provide insights into the way bias correcting precipitation forecasts can improve the skill of streamflow forecasts at extended lead times. We apply eight variants of bias correction approaches to the precipitation forecasts prior to generating the streamflow forecasts. The approaches are based on the linear scaling and the distribution mapping methods. A daily hydrological model is applied at the catchment scale to transform precipitation into streamflow. We then evaluate the skill of raw (without bias correction) and bias corrected precipitation and streamflow ensemble forecasts in sixteen catchments in France. The skill of the ensemble forecasts is assessed in reliability, sharpness, accuracy, and overall performance. A reference prediction system, based on historical observed precipitation and catchment initial conditions at the time of forecast (i.e., ESP method), is used as benchmark in the computation of the skill. The results show that, in most catchments, raw seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts are often more skilful than the conventional ESP method in terms of sharpness. However, they are not significantly better in terms of reliability. Forecast skill is generally improved when applying bias correction. Two bias correction methods show the best performance for the studied catchments, each method being more successful in improving specific attributes of the forecasts: the simple linear scaling of monthly values contribute mainly to increasing forecast sharpness and accuracy, while the empirical distribution mapping of daily values is successful in improving forecast reliability.

scholarly journals Improving statistical forecasts of seasonal streamflows using hydrological model output

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 8701-8736 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Robertson ◽  
P. Pokhrel ◽  
Q. J. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Historical Record ◽  
Base Flow ◽  
Seasonal Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
True Source ◽  
Hybrid Forecasting ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Statistical methods traditionally applied for seasonal streamflow forecasting use predictors that represent the initial catchment condition and future climate influences on future streamflows. Observations of antecedent streamflows or rainfall commonly used to represent the initial catchment conditions are surrogates for the true source of predictability and can potentially have limitations. This study investigates a hybrid seasonal forecasting system that uses the simulations from a dynamic hydrological model as a predictor to represent the initial catchment condition in a statistical seasonal forecasting method. We compare the skill and reliability of forecasts made using the hybrid forecasting approach to those made using the existing operational practice of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology for 21 catchments in eastern Australia. We investigate the reasons for differences. In general, the hybrid forecasting system produces forecasts that are more skilful than the existing operational practice and as reliable. The greatest increases in forecast skill tend to be (1) when the catchment is wetting up but antecedent streamflows have not responded to antecedent rainfall, (2) when the catchment is drying and the dominant source of antecedent streamflow is in transition between surface runoff and base flow, and (3) when the initial catchment condition is near saturation intermittently throughout the historical record.

Estimation of the added value of using rainfall–runoff transformation and statistical models for seasonal streamflow forecasting

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketvara Sittichok ◽  
Ousmane Seidou ◽  
Abdouramane Gado Djibo ◽  
Neeranat Kaewprasert Rakangthong
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

scholarly journals Correcting Errors in Streamflow Forecast Ensemble Mean and Spread

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Wood ◽  
John C. Schaake
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Summer Period ◽  
Streamflow Forecast ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Deterministic Components ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract When hydrological models are used for probabilistic streamflow forecasting in the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework, the deterministic components of the approach can lead to errors in the estimation of forecast uncertainty, as represented by the spread of the forecast ensemble. One avenue for correcting the resulting forecast reliability errors is to calibrate the streamflow forecast ensemble to match observed error characteristics. This paper outlines and evaluates a method for forecast calibration as applied to seasonal streamflow prediction. The approach uses the correlation of forecast ensemble means with observations to generate a conditional forecast mean and spread that lie between the climatological mean and spread (when the forecast has no skill) and the raw forecast mean with zero spread (when the forecast is perfect). Retrospective forecasts of summer period runoff in the Feather River basin, California, are used to demonstrate that the approach improves upon the performance of traditional ESP forecasts by reducing errors in forecast mean and improving spread estimates, thereby increasing forecast reliability and skill.

Seasonal streamflow forecasting - Which are the drivers controlling the forecast quality?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Thomas Bosshard
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Hydrological Regime ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Forecast Quality

<p>Streamflow information for the months ahead is of great value to existing decision-making practices, particularly to those affected by the vagaries of the climate and who would benefit from better understanding and managing climate-related risks. Despite the large effort, there is still limited knowledge of the key drivers controlling the quality of the seasonal streamflow forecasts. In this investigation, we show that the seasonal streamflow predictability can be clustered, and hence regionalised, based on a priori knowledge of local hydro-climatic conditions. To reach these conclusions we analyse the seasonal forecasts of streamflow volumes across about 35400 basins in Europe, which vary in terms of climatology, scale and hydrological regime. We then link the forecast quality to various descriptors including physiography, hydro-climatic characteristics and meteorological biases. This allows the identification of the key drivers along a strong hydro-climatic gradient. Results show that, as expected, the seasonal streamflow predictability varies geographically and seasonally with acceptable values for the first lead months. In addition, the predictability deteriorates with increasing lead months particularly in the winter months. Nevertheless, we show that the forecast quality is well correlated to a set of drivers, which vary depending on the initialization month. The forecast quality of seasonal streamflow volumes is strongly dependent on the basin’s hydrological regime, with quickly reacting basins (of low river memory) showing limited predictability. On the contrary, snow and/or baseflow dominated regions with long recessions (and hence high river memory) show high streamflow predictability. Finally, climatology and precipitation biases are also strongly related to streamflow predictability, highlighting the importance of developing robust bias-adjustment methods.</p>

scholarly journals A Bayesian joint probability post-processor for reducing errors and quantifying uncertainty in monthly streamflow predictions

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 11199-11225
Author(s):  
P. Pokhrel ◽  
D. E. Robertson ◽  
Q. J. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Joint Probability ◽  
Prediction Errors ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Process ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Monthly Streamflow ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Hydrological post-processors refer here to statistical models that are applied to hydrological model predictions to further reduce prediction errors and to quantify remaining uncertainty. For streamflow predictions, post-processors are generally applied to daily or sub-daily time scales. For many applications such as seasonal streamflow forecasting and water resources assessment, monthly volumes of streamflows are of primary interest. While it is possible to aggregate post-processed daily or sub-daily predictions to monthly time scales, the monthly volumes so produced may not have the least errors achievable and may not be reliable in uncertainty distributions. Post-processing directly at the monthly time scale is likely to be more effective. In this study, we investigate the use of a Bayesian joint probability modelling approach to directly post-process model predictions of monthly streamflow volumes. We apply the BJP post-processor to 18 catchments located in eastern Australia and demonstrate its effectiveness in reducing prediction errors and quantifying prediction uncertainty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document