scholarly journals Sutureless Manual Extracapsular Cataract Extraction with Lollipop

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahfooz Hussain ◽  
Homaira Iqbal Khan ◽  
Tahir Ali ◽  
Muhammad Aftab ◽  
Adnan Alam

Purpose:  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cataract extraction through small pupil with the help of a specially designed instrument called lollipop. Study Design:  Interventional case series. Place and Duration of Study:  Euro eye clinic from January 2019 to December 2019. Methods:  Seventeen consecutive patients with pupil diameter of <4mm after maximal pharmacological dilatation were recruited for study. Inclusion criteria was patients with less than 4mm pupil size after maximum pharmacological dilation. Patient with previous anterior segment surgery and small pupil with posterior synechea were excluded. The instrument (lollipop) was originally designed for breaking posterior synechae. Sutureless Manual Extracapsular Cataract Extraction (SMECE), more commonly known as MSICS, was performed in all cases. After tunnel formation and capsulotomy, lollipop was used to bring lens edge out in pupillary margin. Lens was then maneuvered into anterior chamber and expressed out. Results:  All 17 patients had successful SMECE. In one patient pupil was stretched before applying instrument. None of the patients had posterior capsular rupture or hyphaema. Conclusion:  This instrument designed in Center of Ophthalmic Instrument and Equipment Designing (COIED) is very useful, safe and cost effective. In Extra Capsular Cataract Extraction (ECCE) or SMECE, surgeons usually do keyhole iridotomy, mechanical stretching or multiple sphincterotomies for managing small pupil. With this new instrument, cataract extraction can be done without surgical trauma to the pupil, thus preserving pupil shape. Key Words:  Sutureless Manual Extra capsular Cataract Extraction (SMECE), Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS), Miosis.

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gurung ◽  
DB Karki ◽  
S Shrestha ◽  
AP Rijal

Background: An effective method for cataract surgery should be identified to combat cataract blindness. Aim: To study the surgical outcome of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out including one hundred eyes (88 patients) which were divided into two groups using systematic randomization: groups of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE with PCIOL) implantation and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). The postoperative parameters/variables studied were the unaided and best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism. Statistics: Epi info 2000 version statistical software was used for data analysis and calculation of relative risk, 95% CI and p value. The p value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: In the immediate postoperative period, unaided visual acuity of =/> 6/18 was achieved in 24 subjects in MSICS group versus 7 in ECCE with PCIOL group (RR=2.05, 95% CI=1.44 - 2.94, p = 0.0002), whereas the same at 6 - 8 weeks postoperatively was found in 28 and 22 subjects in those groups respectively (RR=1.27, 95% CI=0.86-1.89, p=0.23). The astigmatism of =/> 2 at 6 - 8 weeks was found in 35 and 17 subjects from the conventional and MSICS groups respectively ( R=2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.73, p=0.0002). Conclusion: Both MSICS and conventional ECCE with PCIOL are safe and effective techniques for treatment of cataract patients. A more rapid recovery of good vision can be achieved with MSICS than with conventional ECCE with PCIOL in the immediate postoperative period. Key words: ECCE; MSICS; visual acuity; astigmatism DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i1.3668 Nep J Oph 2009;1(1):13-19


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad Azeem Mirza ◽  
Saba Al Khairy ◽  
Mazhar- Ul-Hassan ◽  
Shahid Azeem Mirza ◽  
Saad Aslam ◽  
...  

Purpose: To analyze the intra-operative and immediate post-operative complications in patients after cataractsurgery in an eye camp.Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in a village of Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan from 7th to9th of February 2020.Material and Methods: Fifteen hundred patients were screened for visual disabilities of which 150 were selectedfor the study. They had a visual acuity of less than 6/9 in one or both eyes and had a cataract. The selectedpatients were operated using either phacoemulsification, extracapsular cataract extraction ECCE), intracapsularcataract extraction (ICCE) or small incision cataract surgery (SICS). The immediate intra-operative as well aspost-operative complications on day 1 after surgery were observed.Results: One hundred and fifty patients were operated. Age ranged from 14 years to 90 years, males were58.7% and females were 41.3%. The most common procedure performed was phacoemulsification 51.3%,followed by ECCE 30.0%, then SICS 18.0% and ICCE 0.7%. The most common intra-operative complication wasposterior capsule rent and the most common post-operative complication was striate keratopathy which was seenin 14.0% individuals. There was a significant association found for post-operative complications with gender withfemales having more post-operative complications as compared to males (P-value = 0.001 < 0.001).Conclusion: Camp surgeries when performed with strict sterilization and in experienced hands can play animportant role in treating cataract, which is the commonest cause of preventable blindness in developingcountries


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ifraheem Khan ◽  
Saba Ali Arif ◽  
Muhammad Raja ◽  
Sheikh Ijaz ◽  
Muhammad Saeed Khan

Purpose:  To use clinical audit in improving the outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery technique Study Design:  Clinical audit. Place and Duration:  Layton Rehmatullah Benevolent Trust Eye hospital Karachi, from September 2019 to December 2019. Methods:  Two hundred patients who had undergone Manual Small Incision Cataract surgery were selected. Cases with traumatic cataract, weak zonules, pseudoexfoliation, and more than 1 diopter difference in keratometric readings, corneal and retinal pathologies were excluded. Surgical complications and visual outcomes were recorded on the 7th postoperative day. Refractive data was recorded from subjective refraction. Data was analyzed by University Hospital Bristol formula. Standards were set using international literature. Deficiencies were noted and technique was modified to improve the outcome. The audit was repeated after 2 months to see whether modifications had improved the outcome. Results:  In the first audit, posterior capsular rupture rate was 1%, corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better was achieved in 85.36% and surgically induced cylinder of less than 2 DC was achieved in 75.60% of the patients. In the second audit all standards were achieved. Posterior capsular rupture did not occur. Corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better was achieved in 90.50% and induced cylinder of less than 2 DC was achieved in 87.05% of the patients. Conclusion:  Clinical audit of the surgical procedures is a good technique in improving the outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery. Key Words:  Cataract extraction, clinical audit, posterior capsular rupture, astigmatism, visual acuity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uzma Fasih ◽  
Erum Shahid ◽  
Arshad Shaikh

Purpose:  To evaluate the frequency, causes and management of pseudophakic glaucoma among the pseudophakic patients presenting in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. Study Design:  Descriptive cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Pakistan, from August 2017 to June 2018. Material and Methods:  Adult patients between 50 to 70 years of age with pseudophakic glaucoma were included in the study by non-probability convenience sampling after institutional review board approval. Patients with primary open angle, primary angle closure, traumatic glaucoma, diabetes mellitus and hypertension were excluded. Pseudophakic glaucoma was labeled in case of cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation and intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg or more in one eye along with glaucomatous optic disc or retinal nerve fiber layer defect on OCT (optical coherence tomography). Frequencies were computed for categorical variables. Data was analyzed on SPSS version 20. Results:  Twenty-eight eyes with pseudophakic glaucoma were studied. There were 15 (53.57%) males. Mean age was 63 ± 10.4 SD years. Mean IOP was 30.78 ± 7.5 mm Hg. Patients with extracapsular cataract extraction were 18 (64.2%) and 10 (35.8%) had phacoemulsification. Most frequent cause was posterior capsular rupture (n = 16, 57.1%) followed by pupillary block, (n = 4, 14.2%) and UGH (n = 3, 10.7%). Medical treatment was successful in 20 (71.4%) and surgical treatment was done in 8 patients. Conclusion:  Most common causes of pseudophakic glaucoma are posterior capsular rupture, vitreous loss, uveitis and pupillary block. Pseudophakic glaucoma is more common with anterior chamber intraocular lenses and extracapsular cataract extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document