scholarly journals Health research methodology education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: A national environmental scan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Wang ◽  
Allison Meiwald ◽  
Robert Harper ◽  
Kristine Van Aarsen ◽  
Justin Yan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Barriers To Teaching ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
National Environmental

Objectives: Our objective was to describe the variability of research methodology teaching among English-speaking Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine (RCPSC-EM) residency programs. We also aimed to identify barriers to teaching research methodology curricula. Methods: An electronic survey was sent by email to program directors and residents of English-speaking RCPSC-EM training programs countrywide. Reminder emails were sent after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Quantitative, descriptive statistics were prepared, and qualitative data and themes were identified. Results: We received a total of 7 responses from the possible 12 program directors (response rate = 58.3%). Out of 354 potential resident respondents, 82 (23.2%) completed the survey. There was disparity between resident and program director responses with respect to the existence of curricula, preparation for Royal College exams, and usefulness for future practice. Barriers to teaching a research methodologies curriculum included lack of time, support, educated faculty, and finances. Conclusion: This survey demonstrates that Canadian EM residency programs vary with respect to research methodology curriculum, and discrepancies exist between residents’ and program directors’ perceptions of the curriculum. Given the lack of a standardized research methodology curriculum for these programs, there is an opportunity to improve training in research methodology.

scholarly journals LO60: Health research methodology education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: a national survey of curriculum assessment

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
A. Wang ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
A. Meiwald ◽  
J. Yan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Curriculum Assessment ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Ethics Teaching ◽  
Competency Based

Introduction: With a shift towards competency-based medical education, it is crucial to not only emphasize learner abilities such as clinical skills but also leadership in the conduct of research. Though the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's (RCPSC) training objectives for Emergency Medicine (EM) residents state that the specialist physician be able to describe the principles of research, the research methodology curriculum across EM training programs in Canada is likely variable. The primary goal of this study was to describe the variability of research methodology teaching among RCPSC-EM residency programs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to English-speaking RCPSC-EM program directors (PDs) and EM residents. The survey investigated residents' and PDs’ thoughts on the adequacy of their local curriculum and asked them to quantify their research methodology teaching. The primary outcome was the frequency and content of current research methodology and research ethics teaching as well as a description of scholarly project requirements of EM residency programs across Canada. The data was presented with simple descriptive statistics. Results: 79 EM residents and 7 PDs responded (response rate 22.3% and 58.3%, respectively). All 7 PDs indicate having a research methodology curriculum while 71.6% of residents are aware of this curriculum. Only 57.1% of PDs report having formal assessments. Most programs (71.4%) teach via small groups while 28.6% of programs use large group sessions. Residents identify teaching as led by research staff (68.9%), staff physicians (60%), and EM researchers (57.8%), while only 17.8% use outside educators. Students noted various modalities of curriculum feedback such as online surveys, weekly forms, and verbal feedback. Regarding the strength of the curricula, 85.7% of PDs believed their curriculum prepares residents for board exams, while only 62.2% of residents felt similarly. When asked about using a standard web-based curriculum module if available, 60.5% of residents responded in favour. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EM residency programs across Canada vary with respect to research methodology curriculum and discrepancies exist between residents’ and program directors’ perceptions of the curriculum. Given the lack of a standardized research methodology curriculum for these residency programs, there is an opportunity for curriculum development to improve training in research methodology.

scholarly journals Residents’ perspective of quality improvement and patient safety education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-231
Author(s):  
Sachin V. Trivedi ◽  
Riley J. Hartmann ◽  
Justin N. Hall ◽  
Laila Nasser ◽  
Danielle Porplycia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Safety Education ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Local Setting

ABSTRACTObjectivesQuality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) competencies are increasingly important in emergency medicine (EM) and are now included in the CanMEDS framework. We conducted a survey aimed at determining the Canadian EM residents’ perspectives on the level of QIPS education and support available to them.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to all Canadian EM residents from the Royal College and Family Medicine training streams. The survey consisted of multiple-choice, Likert, and free-text entry questions aimed at understanding familiarity with QIPS, local opportunities for QIPS projects and mentorship, and the desire for further QIPS education and involvement.ResultsOf 535 EM residents, 189 (35.3%) completed the survey, representing all 17 medical schools; 77.2% of respondents were from the Royal College stream; 17.5% of respondents reported that QIPS methodologies were formally taught in their residency program; 54.7% of respondents reported being “somewhat” or “very” familiar with QIPS; 47.2% and 51.5% of respondents reported either “not knowing” or “not having readily available” opportunities for QIPS projects and QIPS mentorship, respectively; 66.9% of respondents indicated a desire for increased QIPS teaching; and 70.4% were interested in becoming involved with QIPS training and initiatives.ConclusionsMany Canadian EM residents perceive a lack of QIPS educational opportunities and support in their local setting. They are interested in receiving more QIPS education, as well as project and mentorship opportunities. Supporting residents with a robust QIPS educational and mentorship framework may build a cohort of providers who can enhance the local delivery of care.

scholarly journals Emergency medicine procedural skills: what are residents missing?

CJEM ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Petrosoniak ◽  
Jodi Herold ◽  
Karen Woolfrey
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Program Director ◽  
Procedural Skills ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Current State ◽  
Resident Competence

ABSTRACTObjective:This study sought to establish the current state of procedural skills training in Canadian Royal College emergency medicine (EM) residencies.Methods:A national Web-based survey was administered to residents and program directors of all 13 Canadian-accredited Royal College EM residency programs. Programdirectors rated the importance and experience required for competence of 45 EM procedural skills. EM residents reported their experience and comfort in performing the same procedural skills.Results:Thirteen program directors and 86 residents responded to the survey (response rate of 100% and 37%, respectively). Thirty-two (70%) procedures were considered important by > 70% of program directors, including all resuscitation and lifesaving airway procedures. Four procedures deemed important by program directors, including cricothyroidotomy, pericardiocentesis, posterior nasal pack for epistaxis, and paraphimosis reduction, had never been performed by the majority of senior residents. Program director opinion was used to categorize each procedure based on performance frequency to achieve competence. Overall, procedural experience correlated positively with comfort levels as indicated by residents.Conclusions:We established an updated needs assessment of procedural skills training for Canadian Royal College EM residency programs. This included program director opinion of important procedures and the performance frequency needed to achieve competence. However, we identified several important procedures that were never performed by most senior residents despite program director opinion regarding the experience needed for competence. Further study is required to better define objective measures for resident competence in procedural skills.

scholarly journals A National Evaluation of the Scholarly Activity Requirement in Residency Programs: A Survey of Emergency Medicine Program Directors

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Geyer ◽  
Amy H. Kaji ◽  
Eric D. Katz ◽  
Alan E. Jones ◽  
Vikhyat S. Bebarta
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Activity Requirement

scholarly journals MP18: Pre-departure and post-elective requirements for global health electives: a survey of Canadian Royal College emergency medicine programs

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S48-S49
Author(s):  
J. Pritchard ◽  
A. Collier ◽  
S. Bartels
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Development Risks

Introduction: Participation in Global Health (GH) electives can improve resourcefulness, cultural and ethical insight, and personal development. Risks to trainees, hosts and institutions may be minimized through pre-departure and post-elective training. In 2016 such training was mandatory in only 3 Canadian residency programs, however there is no published data specific to Canadian Emergency Medicine (EM) programs. This study sought to identify current GH elective requirements and related perceived gaps among Royal College EM programs. Methods: We conducted two cross-sectional surveys in 2019 (one each for Royal College EM PDs and residents) via email regarding training requirements for GH electives. Additionally, a survey link was distributed in the CAEP EM resident newsletter. We also contacted university PGME and/or global health offices to understand and collate university-wide requirements and resources. Results: Nine PDs responded, with 78% reporting having 1-5 residents participate in GH electives yearly. Many PDs were unsure of the requirements surrounding GH electives; two reported that pre-departure training was required, while none reported requiring post-departure debriefs. Overall, 67% of PDs felt that their residents were moderately prepared for GH electives and 33% felt they were unprepared to some degree. Thirty-three percent believed that improvements should be made to either pre-departure training or both pre- and post-departure training, while 56% were unsure if improvements were needed. Forty-seven out of an estimated 380 residents responded. Thirty-five percent of residents had completed a GH elective during residency. Of residents who participated in a GH elective, only one (6%) reported feeling very prepared; 18 residents (43%) reported there was a need to improve trainings. Residents reported a number of challenges during electives (lack of resources, inadequate supervision, safety issues) and identified priority topics for training. Conclusion: Although EM residents are participating in GH electives, the majority of EM residency programs do not require pre- or post-departure training. Some PDs and residents report varying levels of preparedness, and residents acknowledge a variety of challenges during GH electives. This information can be used to inform pre-departure/post-elective GH training or to encourage EM residents to access university-wide training.

Re: “A National Evaluation of the Scholarly Activity Requirement in Residency Programs: A Survey of Emergency Medicine Program Directors”

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-512
Author(s):  
Marna Rayl Greenberg ◽  
Vicken Y. Totten ◽  
Michael D. Repplinger ◽  
Michael D. Menchine
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Activity Requirement

scholarly journals LO79: The variable landscape of resident selection: A study of Canadian Royal College emergency medicine training programs

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S36-S36
Author(s):  
M. Hale ◽  
W. Cheung ◽  
J. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Selection Processes ◽  
Current Selection

Introduction: Little is known about how Royal College emergency medicine (RCEM) residency programs are selecting their residents. This creates uncertainty regarding alignment between our current selection processes and known best practices and results in a process that is difficult to navigate for prospective candidates. We seek to describe the current selection processes of Canadian RCEM programs. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all RCEM program directors and assistant directors. The survey instrument included 22 questions consisting of both open-ended (free text) and closed-ended (Likert scale) elements. Questions sought qualitative and quantitative data from the following 6 domains; paper application, letters of reference, elective selection, interview, rank order, and selection process evaluation. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: We received responses from 13/14 programs for an aggregate response rate of 92.9%. A candidate's letter of reference was identified as the single most important item from the paper application (38.5%). Having a high level of familiarity with the applicant was considered to be the most important characteristic of a reference letter author (46.2%). Respondents found that providing a percentile rank of the applicant was useful when reviewing candidate reference letters. Once the interview stage is reached, 76.9% of programs stated that the interview was weighted at least as heavily as the paper application; 53.8% weighted the interview more heavily. Once final candidate scores are established for both the paper application and the interview, 100% of programs indicated that further adjustment is made to the rank order list. Only 1/13 programs reported ever having completed a formal evaluation of their selection process. Conclusion: The information gained from this study helps to characterize the landscape of the RCEM residency selection process. We identified significant heterogeneity between programs with respect to which application elements were most valued. Canadian emergency medicine residency programs should re-evaluate their selection processes to achieve improved consistency and better alignment with selection best practices.

scholarly journals Outcome Feedback within Emergency Medicine Training Programs: An Opportunity to Apply the Theory of Deliberate Practice?

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Dalseg ◽  
Lisa A. Calder ◽  
Curtis Lee ◽  
Jaymie Walker ◽  
Jason R. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Outcome Feedback

AbstractObjectivesOutcome feedback is the process of learning patient outcomes after their care within the emergency department. We conducted a national survey of Canadian Royal College emergency medicine (EM) residents and program directors to determine the extent to which active outcome feedback and follow-up occurred. We also compared the perceived educational value of outcome feedback between residents and program directors.MethodsWe distributed surveys to all Royal College-accredited adult and pediatric EM training programs using a modified Dillman method. We analyzed the data using student’s t-test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.ResultsWe received 210 completed surveys from 260 eligible residents (80.8%) and 21 of 24 program directors (87.5%) (overall 81.3%). Mandatory active outcome feedback was not present in any EM training program for admitted or discharged patients (0/21). Follow-up was performed electively by 89.4% of residents for patients admitted to the hospital, and by 44.2% of residents for patients discharged home. A majority of residents (76.9%) believed that patient follow-up should be mandatory compared to 42.9% of program directors (p=0.002). The perceived educational value of outcome feedback was 5.8/7 for residents and 5.1/7 for program directors (difference 0.7; p=0.002) based on a seven-point Likert scale (1=not important; 7=very important).ConclusionWhile Canadian EM training programs do not mandate follow-up, it is performed electively by the majority of residents surveyed. Residents place a significantly greater educational value on outcome feedback than their program directors, and believe that follow-up should be a mandatory component of EM residencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document