scholarly journals THE MAIN FEATURES OF BREAST CANCER IN YOUNG WOMEN AND MODERN APPROACH IN SURGICAL TREATMENT

Author(s):  
Vafa Veliyeva Vafa Veliyeva

Rosenberq SM,et al.Breast 2015 [Managmen of breast cancerin very young women] Ribnikar D,et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2015 [Breast cancer under age 40:a different approach] Henry NL, Shah PD Heider I, Freer PE, Jaqsi R. Chapter 88.[ Cancer of the breast.]Elsevier 2020 National Cancer Inctitute. Physician Data Query (PDQ).[ Breast Cancer Treatment] 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Barbara Corey ◽  
Mary Alison Smania ◽  
Heather Spotts ◽  
Michelle Andersen

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6031-6031
Author(s):  
S. Hawley ◽  
P. Lantz ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
N. Janz ◽  
...  

6031 Background: The choice of surgical breast cancer treatment represents an opportunity for shared decision making (SDM), since both mastectomy and breast conserving surgery are viable options. Yet women vary in their desire for involvement in this decision. Correlates of SDM and/or the level of involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision-making are not known. Methods: Breast cancer patients of Detroit and Los Angeles SEER registries were mailed a questionnaire shortly after diagnosis in 2002 (N = 1,800, RR: 77%). Their responses were merged with a surgeon survey (N = 456, RR: 80%) for a dataset of 1,547 patients of 318 surgeons. Surgical treatment decision making was categorized into: 1) surgeon-based; 2) shared; or 3) patient-based. The concordance between a woman’s self-reported actual and desired decisional involvement was categorized as having more, less, or the right amount of involvement. Decision making and concordance were each analyzed as three-level dependent variables using multinomial logistic regression controlling for clustering within surgeons. Independent variables included patient clinical, treatment and demographic factors, surgeon demographic and practice-related factors, and a measure of surgeon-patient communication. Results: 37% of women reported the surgery decision was shared, 25% that it was surgeon-based, and 38% that it was patient-based. Two-thirds experienced the right amount of involvement, while 13% had less and 19% had more. Compared to women who reported a shared decision, those with surgeon-based decision were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to have male surgeons, and those reporting a patient-based decision were more likely to have received mastectomy vs. breast conserving surgery. Women who were less involved in the surgery decision than they wanted were younger and had less education, while those with more involvement (vs. the right amount) more often had male surgeons. Patient-surgeon communication was associated with decisional involvement. Conclusions: Correlates of SDM and decisional involvement relating to surgical breast cancer treatment differ. Determining patients’ desired role in decision making may as important as achieving a shared decision for evaluating perceived quality of care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Rey ◽  
Anne-Déborah Bouhnik ◽  
Julien Mancini ◽  
Marc-Karim Bendiane ◽  
Valérie Séror ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6544-6544
Author(s):  
S. Hawley ◽  
N. Janz ◽  
A. Hamilton ◽  
S. J. Katz

6544 Background: Although increasing informed decision making has been identified as a mechanism for reducing disparities in breast cancer treatment outcomes, little is known about these issues from the Latina perspective. Methods: 2,030 women with non- metastatic breast cancer diagnosed from 8/05–5/06 and reported to the Los Angeles County SEER registry were identified and mailed a survey shortly after receipt of surgical treatment. Latina and African American women were over-sampled. Survey data were merged to SEER clinical data. We report results on a 50% respondent sample (N=742) which will be updated based on a final respondent sample of 1,400 patients (projected response rate, 72%). Dependent variables were patient reports of how decisions were made (doctor-based, shared, patient-based); their preferred amount of decisional involvement; and two 5-item scales measuring satisfaction with decision-making and decisional regret. Results: 32% of women were white, 28% African American (AA), 20% Latina-English speaking (L-E), and 20% Latina-Spanish speaking (L- SP). About 28% of women in each ethnic group reported a surgeon-based, 33% a shared, and 38% a patient-based surgical treatment decision. L- SP women reported wanting more involvement in decision making more often than white, AA or L-E women (16% vs. 4%, 5%, 5%, respectively, p<0.001). All minority groups were less likely than white women to have high decisional satisfaction with L-SP women having the lowest satisfaction (w-74%, AA-63%, L-E-56%, L-SP-31%, p<0.001). L-SP women were more likely than white, AA or L-E women to have decisional regret (35% vs. 7%, 15%, 16%, respectively, p<0.001). Multivariate regression showed that Latina ethnicity and low literacy were independently associated with both low decisional satisfaction and high decisional regret (p<0.001). Conclusions: Latina women, especially Spanish speakers, report more dissatisfaction with the breast cancer surgical treatment decision-making process than other racial/ethnic groups. These results highlight the challenges to improving breast cancer treatment informed decision making for Latina women. Future interventions to improve satisfaction with the decision process should be tailored to ethnicity and acculturation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0198771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Jingxuan Zhao ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy ◽  
Chun Chieh Lin ◽  
Helmneh M. Sineshaw ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document