scholarly journals Granice mocy wiążącej wyroków karnych w postępowaniu cywilnym

2016 ◽  
pp. 127-152
Author(s):  
Radosław Koper

The paper is a study of binding force of criminal court’s judgement in civil proceedings, related to issue of applying of the article 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The aim of the paper is an attempt to delineate model boundaries of binding of criminal court’s judgement in civil proceedings, in connection with applicaton of such relevant legal regulation. The author focuses on the presentation of the most important threads arising from need to take into account factual situation related to commission of a criminal offence contained in a conviction. The existing normative regulation has been examined and its defects identified. The analysis is connected with consideration of such complex problem from the point of view of recent changes in the amending concerning criminal proceedings and criminal law too. Gathering the tesis specified in article, the author notes that regulation mentioned above doesn’t create legal rule on the clear scope of application

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-179
Author(s):  
Wojciech Zalewski

The introduction of social harmfulness (social danger) to Polish criminal law after the Second World War was politically motivated. For many, this circumstance was sufficient to formulate postulates about the necessity to remove this premise of criminal liability. Social harmfulness still remains controversial today. Before, criminal law was seen as a tool. Currently, it is to be an ultima ratio. It is clear that determining the essence of the crime and its nature, introducing into the law “what belongs to literature”, was necessary in the legal system of a totalitarian state, imposing its views and morals on society. In a legal system of a democratic state, a state ruled by law, a statutory ideological declaration regarding the essence of a crime seems redundant. However, changing the nomenclature is not enough here — there is a possibility of weakening the guaranteeing criminal law function. The social harmfulness premise contributes to the heterogeneity of jurisprudence, even in cases concerning serious crimes. The author is of the opinion that limiting the number of minor cases from the point of view of the state’s right to punish, which paralyzes the judiciary with their sheer number, should take place in a different way than introducing the social harmfulness of an act as a criterion determining the culpability. The currently adopted solution seems irrational and non-functional from the perspective of the legal certainty principle. A more appropriate move seems to be the assessing the advisability of prosecuting an act, i.e. by introducing and implementing the principle of opportunism in criminal proceedings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 96-105

Investigation of crimes against justice in Ukraine is among topical problems of miscarriage of justice. Hundreds of criminal cases are recorded as a crime in the Official Register in Ukraine but only a few have been brought to the court. In this article we try to approach this problem in three ways: from the point of view of criminal law, criminal procedure and criminalistic measures of counteraction to miscarriage of justice. Such an approach helps to demonstrate problems of investigator, prosecutor and judge at different stages of criminal proceeding. Special attention is paid to specific regulation of the issues of criminal proceedings against a certain category of persons, including judges. Mistakes of representatives of law enforcement bodies become visible as a result of analyzing of real criminal cases. Such an analysis is aimed to disclose the problem of counteraction to miscarriage of justice in Ukraine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-22
Author(s):  
Filip Ščerba

Abstract The article deals with the specific instrument used in criminal proceedings called as plea bargaining, or agreement upon the guilt and punishment (in the Czech legal regulation). This instrument is considered as one of the main measures used for acceleration of criminal proceedings and for criminal justice rationalization. Plea bargaining originally belongs to the system of criminal law in the countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal order, but it has been implemented also into the legal orders of countries in Middle Europe region during last decade. Such implementation in connected with some important problems related to the different characteristics of criminal proceedings. The article solves some of these problems, primarily the collision with the basic principles of continental system of criminal law.


Author(s):  
G.V. Romanova ◽  
◽  
V.I. Romanov ◽  

The article considers the main aspects of the electronic criminal investigation technologies application from the point of view of modern legislation of Russia and foreign countries. In modern society, there is a continuous process of improving the means of transmitting information, developing and implementing new technical devices for its processing and storage. The rapid development of science and technology inevitably leads to the desire to regulate the relations that arise in this area from a legal point of view. Meanwhile, in the Russian legal science, the information space is defined through the unity of its two components: the technical one, which includes the communication and communication infrastructure, and the social one – the community of Internet users. In this regard, the normative regulation of this area justifiably causes objective difficulties. The development of high technologies leads to the most frequent use of a relatively new form of technical and forensic support for the investigation of criminal cases in the process of criminal investigation. In the modern practice of investigation, the traces left by criminals on various media due to the expansion of digitalization processes are becoming more and more important every year. Timely, systematic development of legal regulation of the use of electronic information technologies is recognized as the most important condition for the successful digitalization of criminal proceedings. Understanding the need for the introduction of electronic technologies in the investigation of a criminal case from the point of view of the informational and technological nature is necessary, since the criminal process should not be an exception within the framework of a single international information policy, and its technological effectiveness should be dominant.


Author(s):  
Rudīte Timofejeva

Medical coercive measures. The topic, which is actual in Latvia, has not been studied widely, because there are enough cases in the daily world where a person is not criminally prosecuted due to mental disorder or mental backwardness, i.e. not punished for committing a criminal offence, but is treated under appropriate conditions. The fundamental principles of psychiatric assistance in the application of coercive measures of a medical nature are legality, humanity, respect for the rights of man and citizen. Describe and investigate the nature, purpose, legal framework and existing forms of application of coercive measures of a medical nature in the sense of criminal law from a theoretical point of view.


Author(s):  
Janet Loveless ◽  
Mischa Allen ◽  
Caroline Derry

This introductory chapter discusses the theme of this volume, which is about the principles and structure of criminal law. It begins with a discussion on the definition of crime and explains the fundamental principles of criminal law such as Actus Reus and mens rea, the source of criminal law in general, and procedures involved in a criminal trial as distinct from civil proceedings. The chapter explores the four main reasons for criminalising conduct, the burden of proof in criminal proceedings and the classification of crimes and courts. It discusses four theories concerning criminal punishment, reviews several recent cases, and evaluates the criminal justice system in Great Britain based on statistics and public perception.


2019 ◽  
pp. 89-103
Author(s):  
R. Chorniy

Important criminal value, first of all, for the proper qualification of the crimes provided by Art. 109 - 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the justice of the punished person is punished by the purpose and motive of the crime, which are independent psychological features of the subjective party, which, in turn, is not limited to the subject's attitude to the socially dangerous act or omission committed by him and its consequences. The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems that arise in determining the purpose and motives of crimes against the basics of national security and to formulate proposals to improve the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The investigations of the indicated features of the subjective side of the warehouses of criminals provided for in Art. 109 - 114-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine demonstrated that the science of criminal law presents different approaches of the authors to understanding the purpose and motives of the basic and qualified compositions of crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine. Articles of Section I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code are designed in such a way as to presuppose on the one hand a dual interpretation of some subjective features of the crime, on the other - the obligatory features of the subjective party specified in them are superfluous or those which are fixed in violation of the normative design rules technology. Yes, the following issues remain unresolved today: From the point of view of the legislative proposal, the position regarding the necessity to anticipate as a constructive feature of public calls and dissemination of materials with calls for action, provided for in Part 2 of Art. 109 and Part 1 of Art. 110 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, a special purpose, since the proposed approach will create difficulties in proving by the investigators and the court the guilt of the person in committing the relevant crime. Predicting the purpose of the crime as a mandatory feature in the note to Art. 110-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not fully correspond to the main purpose of the said constructive part of the criminal law norms and rules of the normative design technique, and also leads to narrowing the scope of the said article, difficulties in proving in criminal proceedings. the provisions of Part 1 of Art. 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine give grounds for claiming that there is a so-called "double" purpose in it, which creates certain difficulties for qualification and prosecution of the perpetrator precisely for treason. Damage not only to the sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability, defense capacity, state, economic or information security of Ukraine, but also to other types of state security may be desirable for the subject. Features of the technical and legal design of the disposition of Art. 112 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is the basis of different approaches of the authors to understanding the obligatory features of the subjective side of the crime committed by it. Only motive, purpose and motive, purpose or motive that does not facilitate their correct interpretation by law enforcement officials and court practice are considered such.


2020 ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Liliia MARTYNOVA ◽  
Iryna STASHEVSKA ◽  
Liliia KUZMENKO

Introduction. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms states that everyone has the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law to establish the validity of any criminal charges against him. Impartiality, impartiality, objectivity of all subjects involved in criminal proceedings, including a forensic expert, are the key to a fair and efficient trial. The purpose of the paper is a comprehensive, comprehensive study of the mechanism of removal (self-removal) of a forensic expert in criminal proceedings and its analysis in terms of regulations and application in practice. Results. To achieve this goal in the research process used a system of general scientific and special research methods. Terminological analysis was used to reveal the concepts used in the study. The system-structural method was used during the conditional division of the mechanism of withdrawal (self-withdrawal) into stages in accordance with the current CPC of Ukraine. The application of the method of systematic analysis of legal norms allowed to identify gaps, contradictions in the CPC of Ukraine and to formulate proposals for its improvement. The statistical method was used in the study of regulations, formation and substantiation of conclusions. According to the results of the study, a conditional division of the mechanism of withdrawal (self-withdrawal) into stages in accordance with the current CPC of Ukraine was carried out and characterized; outlined and analyzed the grounds for dismissal on which the expert can not perform its function in accordance with current criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine; identified gaps in the legislation governing some aspects of the withdrawal mechanism; problematic practical issues of the procedural order of application for withdrawal (self-withdrawal) are clarified. Conclusion. During the research, substantiated proposals and recommendations were developed and formed, aimed at improving the current criminal procedure legislation on the removal of an expert in order to increase the effectiveness of its application. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is that in the first place, the mechanism of removal (self-removal) of a forensic expert in criminal proceedings is comprehensively studied and its analysis from the point of view of legal regulation and application in practice is carried out.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5(74)) ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
V.S. Sinelnikova

In the article consider a new termination of criminal proceedings as a measure under criminal law in the form of the сourt fine, idea and and judicial practice. Furthermore, the author concludes that a defect of legal regulation exists and offers ways of overcoming that


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document