Escape Decision-Making Based on Intuition and Deliberation under Simple and Complex Judgment and Decision Conditions

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong LI ◽  
Shi CHEN ◽  
Shiguang NI
PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e32522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Javůrková ◽  
Arnošt Leoš Šizling ◽  
Jakub Kreisinger ◽  
Tomáš Albrecht

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (48) ◽  
pp. 12224-12228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Hein ◽  
Michael A. Gil ◽  
Colin R. Twomey ◽  
Iain D. Couzin ◽  
Simon A. Levin

To evade their predators, animals must quickly detect potential threats, gauge risk, and mount a response. Putative neural circuits responsible for these tasks have been isolated in laboratory studies. However, it is unclear whether and how these circuits combine to generate the flexible, dynamic sequences of evasion behavior exhibited by wild, freely moving animals. Here, we report that evasion behavior of wild fish on a coral reef is generated through a sequence of well-defined decision rules that convert visual sensory input into behavioral actions. Using an automated system to present visual threat stimuli to fish in situ, we show that individuals initiate escape maneuvers in response to the perceived size and expansion rate of an oncoming threat using a decision rule that matches dynamics of known loom-sensitive neural circuits. After initiating an evasion maneuver, fish adjust their trajectories using a control rule based on visual feedback to steer away from the threat and toward shelter. These decision rules accurately describe evasion behavior of fish from phylogenetically distant families, illustrating the conserved nature of escape decision-making. Our results reveal how the flexible behavioral responses required for survival can emerge from relatively simple, conserved decision-making mechanisms.


Behaviour ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (9) ◽  
pp. 909-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla A. Salido ◽  
Natalin S. Vicente

Abstract The decision of when and how to escape result crucial for animals because it can result in an interruption to contribute to their fitness. In the present study, we analysed whether speed attack, sex and type of refuge influenced the flight initiation distance (FID) and the closest refuge distance (CRD) in Liolaemus pacha lizards. We also compared the use of different type of refuges. Sex influence both CRD and FID, which would be discussed according to the size of their home range, the escape speed and sexual dichromatism. The interaction between speed and type of refuge used, influence CRD, suggesting that lizards perceived different predation risks. At high-speed approaches, lizards chose the closest refuge, rocks; while at low-speed approaches, lizards chose shrubs as a refuge, mainly the small ones. Lizard’s decision-making is discussed in relation to the refuge protection, their microclimatic conditions and visibility.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document