Lung Delayed Hypersensitivity. A case with particular features

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2071-2073
Author(s):  
Mihaela Prodea ◽  
Eugen Radu Boia ◽  
Raluca Amalia Ceausu ◽  
Cosmin Librimir ◽  
Gheorghe Iovanescu ◽  
...  

Delayed hypersensitivity reactions are inflammatory reactions initiated by mononuclear leukocytes. These reactions are mediated by T cells and monocytes/macrophages rather than by antibodies. We describe a case of 50 years old man with lung type IV hypersensitivity. The case of lung delayed hypersensitivity presented has some particular histopathological and immunohistochemical features. The diagnosis of lung delayed type hypersensitivity requires analysis of correlation between clinic, radiographic, physiologic and pathologic criteria.

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. 1265-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Alban ◽  
Roland Kaufmann ◽  
Edelgard Lindhoff-Last ◽  
Wolf-Henning Boehncke ◽  
Ralf J. Ludwig ◽  
...  

SummaryEczematous lesions, resulting from type IV sensitizations are well-known and relatively frequent cutaneous adverse effects of s.c. heparin therapy. If anticoagulation is further required intravenous heparin, heparinoids or lepirudin may be used as a substitute. However, these alternatives are not optimal in terms of practicability and/or safety-profiles. As molecular weight of different heparin preparations has repetitively been implied to determine the frequency of sensitization, we hypothesized, that due to its low molecular weight the pentasaccharide fondaparinux may provide a practicable and safe anticoagulant therapy in patients with delayed type hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) to heparin and other oligosaccharides. To test this concept, patients referred for diagnosis of cutaneous reactions after s.c. anticoagulant treatment underwent a series of in vivo skin allergyand challenge-tests with unfractionated heparin, a series of low molecular weight heparins (nadroparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin, enoxaparin and certoparin), the heparinoid danaparoid and the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux. In total, data from twelve patients was evaluated. In accordance with previously published data, we report a high crossreactivity among heparins and heparinoids. In contrast – and in support of our initial hypothesis – sensitization towards the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux was rarely observed. Plotting the cumulative incidence against the determined molecular weight of the individual anticoagulant preparations, shows that molecular weight generally is a key determinant of sensitization towards heparins and other oligosaccharides (r2=0.842, p=0.009). Hence, fondaparinux may be used as a therapeutic alternative in patients with cutaneous DTH relations towards heparin and other polysaccharides.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e230144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sameed ◽  
Christine Nwaiser ◽  
Prashant Bhandari ◽  
Sarah A Schmalzle

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are considered variants of a disease continuum that results in a life-threatening exfoliative mucocutaneous disease. These are categorised as type IV cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions, and antibiotics are often implicated as a cause. Penicillins and other beta-lactam antibiotics are known to cause both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. While immediate IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between penicillins and carbapenems is well studied, less information on the risk of type IV delayed cell-mediated cross-reactivity between the two is available. We present a case of meropenem-induced SJS in a patient with documented history of SJS from amoxicillin. There are few cases of cross-reactivity with carbapenems reported in the literature, but based on the potential for life-threatening reaction, it is likely prudent to avoid the use of any beta-lactams in a patient with a history of SJS, TEN or any other severe cutaneous adverse reactions to another beta-lactam antibiotic.


1975 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
P W Askenase ◽  
B J Hayden ◽  
R K Gershon

Mice immunized with more SRBC than are required to produce optimal delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, developed good antibody responses and poor delayed foot pad reactions. Cyclophosphamide treatment in low doses (20 mg/kg) before immunization, augmented the delayed-type hypersensitivity without affecting antibody responses. Cyclophosphamide did not augment delayed responses to optimal doses of SRBC (0.01%), but did augment the delayed hypersensitivity response of mice immunized with a suboptimal antigen dose (0.001%); which produced no detectable antibody response with or without cyclophosphamide pretreatment. These results suggest that antibody feedback is not the sole regulator of delayed reactions; the possibility that suppressor T cells may also be involved is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashi Sandooja ◽  
Michael Dominic Morocco ◽  
Martin Smith

Abstract Introduction- Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disorder, affecting about 4.6 percent of the U.S. population aged 12 and older. The most common treatment is synthetic thyroxine hormone supplementation-levothyroxine, starting at 1.6 mcg/kg.Hypersensitivity reactions to levothyroxine are rare. Two cases have been published of successful oral desensitization, for suspected IgE mediated reactions. There are no published protocols describing induction of drug tolerance to immunologic, non-IgE mediated reaction to levothyroxine. The objective of this case report is to describe a novel outpatient protocol, for oral desensitization to levothyroxine, in the setting of a delayed immunologic (non-IgE mediated) reaction. Case report- A 66 year old male with history of hypothyroidism, diagnosed in 2010 presented to outpatient endocrinology. Between 2010 and 2019, the patient was on multiple brands and formulations of levothyroxine. He noticed an itchy, raised rash on abdomen, chest and arms, within a few months after starting each of the above. No mucosal involvement or signs of end organ damage were noted. The rash was deemed a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, based on history and histological findings on biopsy. The patient reported clearance of the rash when he was off any form of thyroid supplementation, and reappearance of the rash when he re-trialed it. The patient had normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels while he was on supplementation despite the rash. The patient’s TSH after discontinuing treatment was 104 (uIU/mL) and free thyroxine (T4) was 0.13 ng/dl (0.9–1.7). All components of previous brands of levothyroxine were compared and no common ingredient was thought to be contributing to hypersensitivity reactions. Subsequently, an oral desensitization protocol was initiated at 0.075 mcg daily with weekly increase in doses over seven weeks to reach a target dose of 75 mcg. Discussion- The patient was tried on different brands of levothyroxine and dessicated thyroid hormone. He consistently developed a type IV hypersensitivity reaction within a few months after starting them. The patient had uncontrolled TSH levels after discontinuing the treatment and was at risk of complications of untreated hypothyroidism. This necessitated the need for desensitization. There have been previous case reports of oral or IV desensitization, in suspected IgE mediated reactions, but we describe the first case of induction of levothyroxine tolerance in an immunologic non-IgE mediated reaction. Subsequently, the patient tolerated a therapeutic dose of levothyroxine, with no appearance of rash or itching, for almost 6 months. This case report describes a novel approach to levothyroxine desensitization over a period of seven weeks in an outpatient setting in response to a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
N V Lebedeva ◽  
T N Myasnikova ◽  
T V Latysheva

The article presents the proprietary data of the survey of patients who had undergone a history of hypersensitivity reactions after administration of iodinated contrast media (RCM), the estimation of skin tests with RCM in these patients and two clinical cases of patients who had a history of delayed-type hypersensitivity.


Author(s):  
Malini Bhole

Hypersensitivity reactions are aberrant immune responses that are provoked by innocuous extrinsic or self-antigens, are mediated by B-cells or T-cells, and may result in tissue or organ damage. Coombs and Gell classified hypersensitivity reactions into four types, based on the different immune responses: type I, or immediate hypersensitivity; type II, or antibody-mediated (humoral) cytotoxicity; type III, or immune-complex disease; and type IV, or delayed hypersensitivity. This chapter reviews the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of hypersensitivity reactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document