scholarly journals Dietary Intake in Relation to the Risk of Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-379
Author(s):  
Neda Heidarzadeh-Esfahani ◽  
Davood Soleimani ◽  
Salimeh Hajiahmadi ◽  
Shima Moradi ◽  
Nafiseh Heidarzadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Reflux Disease

Associations between sleep, dietary intake and physical activity in children: a systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E Jensen ◽  
Lisa G Wood ◽  
Rebecca B Williams ◽  
Clare E Collins
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dietary Intake

scholarly journals Surgical treatment of recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Mario Nosotti ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Carolina Perali ◽  
Cristina Ogliari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently seen in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Long-standing GERD may cause esophagitis, long-segment strictures, and Barrett’s esophagus and may worsen pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis with an increased risk of end-stage lung disease. Surgical treatment of recalcitrant GERD remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the current data on surgical treatment of recalcitrant GERD in SSc patients. Materials and methods A systematic literature review according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted. Results A total of 101 patients were included from 7 studies. The age ranged from 34 to 61 years and the majority were females (73.5%). Commonly reported symptoms were heartburn (92%), regurgitation (77%), and dysphagia (74%). Concurrent pulmonary disease was diagnosed in 58% of patients. Overall, 63 patients (62.4%) underwent open fundoplication, 17 (16.8%) laparoscopic fundoplication, 15 (14.9%) Roux en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and 6 (5.9%) esophagectomy. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 65 months. Recurrent symptoms were described in up to 70% and 30% of patients undergoing fundoplication and RYGB, respectively. Various symptoms were reported postoperatively depending on the type of surgical procedures, anatomy of the valve, need for esophageal lengthening, and follow-up. Conclusions The treatment of recalcitrant GERD in SSc patients is challenging. Esophagectomy should be reserved to selected patients. Minimally invasive RYGB appears feasible and safe with promising preliminary short-term results. Current evidence is scarce while a definitive indication about the most appropriate surgical treatment is lacking.

Sa063 SCORING AND USES OF THE REFLUX DISEASE QUESTIONNAIRE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-404-S-405
Author(s):  
Shai Posner ◽  
Matthew Harbrecht ◽  
Alexander Reddy ◽  
Nicholas Koutlas ◽  
Jonathan Reichstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Reflux Disease Questionnaire ◽  
Disease Questionnaire

scholarly journals Factors influencing obesogenic dietary intake in young children (0–6 years): systematic review of qualitative evidence

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e007396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veena Mazarello Paes ◽  
Ken K Ong ◽  
Rajalakshmi Lakshman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Qualitative Evidence

675 FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS ORAL PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Schiliró Tristão ◽  
Francisco Tustumi ◽  
Guilherme Tavares ◽  
Letícia Nogueira Datrino ◽  
Maria Carolina Andrade Serafim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Intake

Abstract   Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a widely studied and highly prevalent condition. However, few is reported about the exact efficacy and safety of fundoplication (FPT) compared to oral intake proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) aims to compare PPI and FPT in relation to the efficacy, as well as the adverse events associated with these therapies. Methods This systematic review was guided by PRISMA statement. Search carried out in June 2020 was conducted on Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were (I) patients with GERD; (II) Randomized clinical trials, comparing oral intake PPI with FPT; (III) relevant outcomes for this review. The exclusion criteria were (I) reviews, case reports, editorials and letters (II) transoral or endoscopic FPT (III) studies with no full text. No restrictions were set for language or period. Certainty of evidence and risk of bias were assessed with GRADE Pro and with Review Manager Version 5.4 bias assessment tool. Results Ten RCT were included. Meta-analysis showed that heartburn (RD = −0.19; 95% CI = −0.29, −0.09) was less frequently reported by patients that underwent FPT. Furthermore, patients undergoing surgery had greater pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter than those who used PPI (MD = 7.81; 95% CI 4.79, 10.83). There was no significant difference between groups in the percentage of time with pH less than 4 in 24 hours, sustained remission and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. Finally, FPT did not increase significantly the risk for adverse events such as postoperative dysphagia and impaired belching. Conclusion FPT is a more effective therapy than PPI treatment for GERD, without significantly increasing the risk for adverse events. However, before indicating a possible surgical approach, it is extremely important to correctly assess and select the patients who would benefit from FPT, such as those with severe erosive esophagitis, severe respiratory symptoms, low adherence to continuous drug treatment and patients with non-acid reflux, to ensure better results.

Nutrient and Food Intake of Indonesian Children Under 5 Years of Age: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 101053952110410
Author(s):  
Hesti Retno Budi Arini ◽  
Veni Hadju ◽  
Preetha Thomas ◽  
Megan Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Narrative Analysis ◽  
Fruits And Vegetables ◽  
Child Malnutrition ◽  
Micronutrient Deficiencies ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Children Under 5

The Indonesian Government’s targets to reduce the prevalence of child malnutrition are unlikely to be met based on current progress. Adequate dietary intake is key to meeting these targets. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the nutrient and food intake of Indonesian children under 5 years of age. Peer-reviewed and gray literature published between 2007 and 2019 were collected. Of 1500 records, 38 articles met the study inclusion criteria and a narrative analysis was conducted. Children under 5 years were reported to have ranging energy and macronutrient intakes, some with adequate protein intake. Micronutrient deficiencies, particularly iron, zinc, calcium, and vitamin C, were reported. Animal-source foods, fruits, and vegetables were consumed by children, but frequency and/or volume of consumption was low, and it is among the probable causes of micronutrient deficiency among children under 5 years. The absence of reporting micronutrient intake in the national survey limited evidence to inform nutrition-related policies. The implementation of a national micronutrient survey will be beneficial in informing policy and practice aimed at reducing the prevalence of child malnutrition in line with national targets, through improvement in dietary intake.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document