Veränderung der Industrielogik im Maschinenbau – Teil 2/Change of industrial logic in mechanical engineering sector – Part 2

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (01-02) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
E. Richard Geitner ◽  
Oliver Schöllhammer ◽  
Thomas Bauernhansl

Die Digitalisierung und der Wandel der Kundenbedürfnisse verändern das Nutzerverhalten sowie das Nutzenverständnis der Kunden und erfordern neue Wertangebote, also Produkte und Dienstleistungen, auch im B2B-Bereich. Deshalb werden bisher getrennte oder vollständig neue Wertangebote zunehmend in gemeinsamen Geschäftsmodellen von einer Gruppe interagierender Akteure innerhalb von sogenannten Business Ecosystems gebündelt. Die Relevanz dieses Sachverhalts und die einhergehende Veränderung der Kooperationsart und Interaktionsintensität zwischen den Unternehmen (Industrielogik) wurde in einer Studie mit 16 Maschinenbauunternehmen untersucht. Im ersten Teil des Beitrags, der in der wt Werkstattstechnik online Ausgabe 11/12-2019 erschienen ist, wurde die Ausgangssituation der Branche, der Stand der Forschung und die Zielsetzung der Studie beschrieben. In diesem zweiten Teil werden die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse der Studie diskutiert und ein zusammenfassender Ausblick gegeben.   Digitization and changes in customer needs affect both user behaviour and understanding and require new value propositions (products and services), also in the B2B sector. For this reason, previously separate or completely new value propositions are increasingly bundled in common business models by a group of interacting actors within so-called business ecosystems. The relevance of this issue and the associated change in the type of cooperation and interaction intensity between companies (industry logic) was investigated in a study with 16 mechanical engineering companies. In the first part of the article, in the wt Werkstattstechnik online issue 11/12 2019, the initial situation of the industry, the state of research and the objectives of the study were described. In this second part, the main findings of the study are discussed and a summarizing outlook is given.

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 873-877
Author(s):  
R. Geitner ◽  
O. Schöllhammer ◽  
T. Bauernhansl

Die Digitalisierung und der Wandel der Kundenbedürfnisse verändern das Nutzerverhalten sowie das Nutzenverständnis der Kunden und erfordern neue Wertangebote (Produkte und Dienstleistungen), auch im B2B-Bereich. Deshalb werden bisher getrennte oder vollständig neue Wertangebote zunehmend in gemeinsamen Geschäftsmodellen von einer Gruppe interagierender Akteure innerhalb von sogenannten Business Ecosystems gebündelt. Die Relevanz dieses Sachverhalts und die einhergehende Veränderung der Kooperationsart und Interaktionsintensität zwischen den Unternehmen (Industrielogik) wurde in einer Studie untersucht, bei der 16 Maschinenbauunternehmen teilnahmen. In diesem Beitrag werden die Ausgangssituation der Branche, der Stand der Forschung und die Zielsetzung der Studie beschrieben. In einem zweiten Teil, der in einer späteren wt Werkstattstechnik online-Ausgabe veröffentlicht wird, werden die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse der Studie diskutiert und ein zusammenfassender Ausblick gegeben.   Digitization and changes in customer needs affect both user behaviour and understanding and require new value propositions (products and services), also in the B2B sector. For this reason, previously separate or completely new value propositions are increasingly bundled in common business models by a group of interacting actors within so-called business ecosystems. The relevance of this issue and the associated change in the type of cooperation and interaction intensity between companies (industry logic) was investigated in a study with 16 mechanical engineering companies. This article describes the initial situation of the industry, the state of research and the objectives of the study. In a separate second part that is being published in a later issue of wt online the main findings of the study are discussed and a summarizing outlook is given.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-73
Author(s):  
Larysa Hlinenko ◽  
◽  
Yurii Daynovskyy ◽  

The aim of the article. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies deeply affect business development and, as a consequence, business models (BMs) as a way of doing business by its actors. Conventional firm-centric e-business models are not always good for the IoT due to its ecosystem nature; implementing innovative models faces a number of challenges. It is a BMC (Business Model Canvas) template that is mainly used to create business models at enterprise level. Modified in accordance with the specifics of IoT, BMC templates overcome the limitations of the classical BMC and provide interrelated BMC solutions for the different layers of the IoT architecture. However, all of these templates, when modelling value propositions, focus only on the current state of consumer needs. The models ignore the interdependencies between the allowable attribute values of the certain BMC blocks, in particular between key resources, value proposition and revenue model. The article aims to analyse the IoT business models based on BMC, to identify the effective values of individual components of the BMC and the expediency of combining them within a particular BM and to specify means of taking into account the changing state of consumer needs in the formation of the BMC components. Analyses results. The IoT outlines a paradigm relying on a continuous set of things which interact with forming a worldwide dynamic network. The functionality of the IoT device sets the technological constraints and perspectives for value propositions and revenue generation modesl. The analysis of the proposed variants of IoT BMC and their successful implementation cases provided for clarification and generalisation of effective value propositions consistent with IoT specificity. For each of these value propositions the compatible revenue models and required functions of IoT devices were identified. In accordance with the proposed sophisticated classification of the IoT device functionalities, the valid types of IoT devices as a key resource for the realisation of a particular value proposition were identified. The formation of the BM should start from developing the concept of value offered to the consumer. To be effective the creation of the value proposition should be preceded by the identification of the consumer need and the state of its satisfaction by existing means. This state can be the following one: the need exists, but is not recognized by consumers and is not satisfied by existing means at all; the need exists and is identified by consumers but is not satisfied by existing means at all; the need is clear to consumers but is not fully satisfied by existing means. In the first two cases, the value proposition should ensure meeting the need at a minimum sufficient level. In case the means of satisfying the need exist, it is necessary to assess the current state of satisfying the need and to determine the extent to which the proposed IoT solution would change this state. The lines of development of needs and means of their satisfaction, adapted to the specifics of the particular need and IoT at large, are proposed to be used for assessing the state of need satisfaction. Specificity of IoT requires supplementing the set of lines of development of needs and satisfaction means with the lines launched by IoT possibilities. Several such lines, in particular, the line of increasing the consumer's awareness and the line of increasing the ideality of the final need satisfaction, have been proposed. A matrix of need parameters has been developed to simplify the consideration of the content and state of need in the formation of value and revenue models. Conclusions and directions for further research. The importance of taking into account the characteristics of needs in value proposition design makes it necessary to identify "Needs" as a distinct BMC component described by a set of specific attributes. The values of these attributes, together with the resources of the participants, provide the basis for the value proposition content and affect the choice of the revenue model. Setting the attribute values requires determining the current and expected state of needs and the means of meeting them on relevant lines of development, the further elaboration and parameterisation of which, taking into account the specificity of IoT, is the subject of further research. The result of the digital service provided by the IoT device appears to be a key innovative element of the IoT value proposition. That suggests the separating the "IoT contribution" element in the "Value proposition" component of the BMC or introducing it as a BMC component to reflect the relevant digital service. The content of the service will determine the functionality of the IoT device and the IT infrastructure requirements. When defining the value proposition, the real change in the state of all the components of the IoT ecosystem causing changes in the prioritisation of individual needs should also be considered. Clarifying the concept of the value proposition, the needs it satisfies and the specific "IoT component" of value creates the basis for identifying consumer segments and the ways of interacting with them. Compatibility and effectiveness of the joint use of specific value propositions and revenue models as well as compliance of the value proposition content, cost and promotion to the target consumer demands should be also considered when specifying the blocks of BMC. The BMC is to be built for each of the ioT ecosystem partners. The present research recommendations refer mainly to developers and manufacturers of IoT devices and service providers; the construction of the BMC for other IoT system key players (platform providers/providers, system integrators and marketplace providers), as well as the problem of these models coordination, should be the subjects of separate research. Keywords: Internet of Things (IoT), business model, Business Model Canvas (BMC), value proposition, revenue model


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 3006-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Ferasso ◽  
Tatiana Beliaeva ◽  
Sascha Kraus ◽  
Thomas Clauss ◽  
Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Reinhold ◽  
Florian J. Zach ◽  
Dejan Krizaj

Purpose This paper aims to review the state of the art for the Tourism Review special issue on “Business Models in Tourism”. The authors’ purpose is twofold: first, to contextualize the empirical and conceptual contributions featured in the special issue in relation to the state of research on business models in tourism. Second, the authors position the special issue in the broader scholarly conversation on business models to identify avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach The authors systematically review the content of tourism-specific business model studies from leading literature databases to answer four questions relevant for future work on business models in tourism: First, how do tourism scholars define the business model concept? Second, what is the ontological stance (object, schema or tool) of existing studies of tourism business models? Third, what are the methodological preferences of existing work on business models in tourism? And finally, what qualifies as rigorous business model research? Findings From the critical review of 32 contributions, the authors identify a minimal consensus and dominant approach to conceptualizing the business model concept in tourism studies. In addition, the authors reveal a strong preference for small-n case study research designs. In sum, those findings point to important gaps and design decisions for future business model studies in tourism. Originality/value This review of the state of research on business models in tourism details research opportunities with regard to theory, methods and applications that tourism scholars can investigate to contribute to the theory and practice of business model management.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-70
Author(s):  
Florence Eid

IntroductionThis paper is a report on the state of research in two areas of Islamicstudies: Islam and economics and Islam and governance. I researched andwrote it as part of my internship at the Ford Foundation during the summerof 1992. On Discourse. The study of Islam in the United States has moved far beyondthe traditional historical and philological methods. This is perhapsbest explained by the development of analytically rigorous social sciencemethods that have contributed to a better balance between the humanisticconcerns of the more traditional approaches and efforts at systematizingthe study of Islam and classifying it across boundaries of communities,religions, even epochs. This is said to have s t a d with the developmentof irenic attitudes towards Islam, which changed the direction of westemorientalist writings from indifference (at best) and often open hostility toand contempt of Islamic values (however they were understood) to phenomenologicalworks by scholars who saw the study of Islam as somethingto be taken seriously and for its own sake, which is best exemplifiedby Clifford Geertz's Islam Observed.The work of Edward Said contested this evolution, and the publicationof his Orientalism has been described as "a stick of dynamite"' that,despite its impact in mobilizing a reevaluation of the field, was unwarrantedin its pessimism. In any case, the field has continued to evolve,with the most powerful force moving it being the subject itself. Thephenomenological/orientalist approach, if we can point to one today, ...


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2241
Author(s):  
Moritz Ehrtmann ◽  
Lars Holstenkamp ◽  
Timon Becker

Community energy actors play an important role in the energy transition, fostering the diffusion of sustainable innovation in the renewable energy market. Because market conditions for business models in the renewable energy sector are changing and feed-in-tariff (FiT) schemes expiring, community energy companies are in the process of innovating their business models. In recent years, several community energy companies in Germany have entered the electricity retail market selling locally generated electricity from their renewable energy installations to customers in their region. We explore the evolving regional electricity business models for community energy companies in Germany, related governance structures, and the role they play for a sustainable energy transition. In order to implement these complex business models, community energy companies cooperate with professional marketing partners (intermediaries), which are capable of taking over the tasks and obligations of electricity suppliers. Through a series of expert interviews and desk research, we identify three distinctive regional electricity business models and examine opportunities and challenges to their implementation. Results show that there are different forms of cooperation, leading to specific governance structures and creating a set of new value propositions. Through these forms of cooperation, business networks emerge, which can function as incubators for sustainable innovation and learning for the post-FiT era.


1994 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth van Houts
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document