scholarly journals Prevalence and severity of temporomandibular joint disorders among house officers & post-graduate residents of private & public sector medical hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-8
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ilyas ◽  
Fariha Kifayat ◽  
Faryal Gul ◽  
Salman Khan ◽  
Sumaira Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Postgraduate Students

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the prevalence and severity of TMDs in house officers and postgraduate students belonging to public and private sector medical and dental colleges.METHODOLOGY:This was a cross sectional study carried out from July 2018 to September 2018 in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sardar Begum Dental College and Hospital, Peshawar. After approval from ethical committee Gandhara University, an informed consent was obtained and Fonseca questionnaire was used to evaluate TMDs from 320 subjects who voluntarily want to participate in the study; selected with equal genders from public and private sectors medical and dental hospitals, Peshawar. Those who have musculoskeletal, neurological, systemic problems and orthodontics treatment subjects were excluded from the study.RESULTS:The age range selected was 22-32 years and the mean age presentation was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. Results showed that female postgraduate residents of private sector consider themselves tenser (18.8%) than others. 70.17% female house officers of private sector have noticed TMJ clicking and 83.17% of male house officers clenched or grind their teeth than others.CONCLUSION:The study concluded that mild and moderate TMDs are more common in-house officers and postgraduate residents.KEYWORDS: Temporomandibular Disorders, Prevalence, Temporomandibular Joint, Fonseca’s Anamnestic Index, Cross-Sectional Study

scholarly journals Cephalometric characteristics of patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: A radiographic cross-sectional study

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
AsimMustafa Khan ◽  
Rachita Chengappa ◽  
VeenaS Narayanan ◽  
JaishankarHomberhalli Puttabuddi ◽  
Mangala Rakaraddi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Patterns of Cone-Beam Computed Tomoography (CBCT) Utilization by Various Dental Specialties: A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Dental and Maxillofacial Specialty Center

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1042
Author(s):  
Silvina Friedlander-Barenboim ◽  
Wafi Hamed ◽  
Avraham Zini ◽  
Noam Yarom ◽  
Itzhak Abramovitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Baseline Information

The study aimed to analyze the uses of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis and treatment in various dental specialties. This 4-year cross-sectional study analyzed the records of 1409 individuals who underwent a CBCT at the Oral and Maxillofacial Center at Sheba Medical Center, Israel. The average age of the patients was 27.9 ± 11.5 (range: 9–86 years). Patients were referred for CBCT by the following departments: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (1063; 75.5%), Endodontics (182; 12.9%), Periodontology (122; 8.6%) and Orthodontics (42; 3.0%). Most CBCT radiographs evaluated the maxilla (774; 55.0%), followed by the mandible (481; 34.1%) and both (154; 10.9%). The target anatomical structures included: bone (694; 49.3%), teeth (307; 21.7%), and both jaws (408; 29.0%). The main indications for CBCT use were: assessment of anatomical structures and implant sites (787; 55.9%), determine root canals morphology (182; 12.9%), visualization of impacted teeth, tooth alignment, and localization (177; 12.6%), suspected cysts or tumors (148; 10.5%), evaluation of Temporomandibular joint disorders (106; 7.5%) and other reasons (9; 0.6%). In 279 (19.8%) of cases, the diagnosis changed following CBCT, mainly in Orthodontics tooth analysis (28 (66.7%); p < 0.001). Practitioners and health authorities should be aware of this baseline information regarding CBCT use in the diagnosis and assessment of various oral and maxillofacial pathologies, anomalies and tooth position relative to anatomic structures. Continuing research and publications of CBCT utilization and guidelines are recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document