Wissenschaftlicher Beirat für Familienfragen beim Bundesfamilienministerium: (Vor-)Geschichte, Funktionen und Tätigkeit in der Politikberatung

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 495-510
Author(s):  
Jörg M. Fegert ◽  
Irene Gerlach

Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen Überblick auf die lange, wechselvolle Geschichte des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats für Familienfragen, die von unterschiedlichen Phasen der Beratungstätigkeit mit jeweils auch unterschiedlicher Kooperationsintensität zwischen Beirat und Ministerium geprägt war. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Satzung von 1970, die für das besondere (Selbst-)Verständnis des Beirats sowie seine Funktion innerhalb der bundesrepublikanischen Politikberatung entscheidend ist. Die Autoren zeigen aber auch auf, wie sich der Beirat den gegenwärtigen Herausforderungen in der sog. Mediendemokratie stellt und geben einen Ausblick auf mögliche Zukunftsfelder der Politikberatung in der Familienpolitik. Abstract: Scientific Advisory Board on Family Affairs at the Ministry: History, Functions and Activities in Political Consultancy This article provides an overview of the long, eventful history of the Scientific Advisory Board on Family Affairs, which was characterized by different phases of advisory work, each with different levels of cooperation between the Advisory Board and the Ministry. The focus is on the statute of 1970, which determines the particularity and (self-)conception of the advisory board and its function within the Federal Republic’s political consulting. However, the authors also illustrate how the Advisory Board is facing the current challenges in so-called media democracy and give a perspective on possible future fields of advisory activity in family policy.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4449-4449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lekha Mikkilineni ◽  
Shilpa Shahani ◽  
Bonnie Yates ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Tara Palmore ◽  
...  

Background: Early data from anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell trials suggest that concurrent infection can lead to poor outcomes. 1,2 The relationship between CAR T-cell mediated inflammatory responses and infections is not well-established. With CAR T-cell therapies more readily available, practitioners must identify which patient, disease and CAR T-cell specific parameters are associated with an increased risk of infection to optimize outcomes. We provide a comprehensive analysis of infection risk within the first 30 days after CAR T-cell infusion across multiple types of CAR T-cell trials targeting distinct antigens. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted at the National Cancer Institute analyzing infectious complications in subjects who underwent CAR T-cell therapy on one of four phase I clinical trials, targeting CD19, CD22, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) or disialoganglioside (GD2) from 2012 though 2018. Baseline characteristics are in Table 1. The primary objective was to establish the incidence of infections between initiation of lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy through day 30 after CAR T-cell infusion. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for infection. Patients were censored at relapse and/or initiation of alternative therapy, including treatment for relapse or consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Univariate screening methods were used to identify parameters associated with increased risk of infection Results: Amongst 144 subjects, 52 (36.1%) received anti-CD19 CAR T-cells (CAR-T); 53 (36.8%) received anti-CD22 CAR-T, 26 (18.1%) received anti-BCMA CAR-T; and 13 (9%) received anti-GD2 CAR-T. The median age was 18 years (range: 4 to 66). Sixty-one (42.4%) had undergone at least one prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and 24 (16.7%) had at least one prior autologous HSCT. Sixty-eight (47.2%) had a history of a recent infection within 100 days of initiation of LD chemotherapy, of which 17 were a major chronic infection and 9 were considered severe. Fifty-eight (40.3%) subjects experienced a total of 103 infections from initiation of LD chemotherapy through day 30 post CAR T-cell infusion, with the median time to first infection being 6 days post-CAR infusion. Twenty-eight (19.4%) subjects had more than 1 infection; 20 (13.9%) subjects had C. difficile infection. The 103 infections consisted of 47 (45.6%) distinct episodes of focal bacterial infections (e.g., sinusitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection), 25 (24.2%) episodes of bacteremia, 22 (21.4%) viral infections, and 9 (8.7%) invasive fungal infections. Fourteen infections (13.6%) occurred between initiation of LD chemotherapy and day 0 (prior to CAR T-cell infusion). Fever and neutropenia, without a source, was documented as a distinct entity in 85 patients (59.0%). Using univariate statistical screening methods, we identified 4 parameters that were individually associated with an increased risk of infection: increasing number of prior therapies (p=0.0034), prior history of recent infection within the past 100 days (p=0.0064), age > 18 (p =0.028), or enrollment on the CD22 CAR trial (p=0.0028). Eliminating the trial, since that is not generalizable, and combining these into a multivariable logistic regression model identified age > 18, prior history of infection and prior lines of therapies jointly associated with an increased risk of infection. Using these parameters, a predictive model was developed, which, when applied to the data set used to develop the model, can correctly predict 69 of 86 patients without an infection (80.3%; CI: 70.3-88.0%) as well as 32 of 58 patients with an infection (55.2%; 95% CI: 41.5- 68.3%). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, we provide the largest experience to date analyzing infection in the setting of CAR T-cell therapy across multiple CAR constructs. Our study demonstrates that adult age, prior history of infection, increased number of prior therapies and enrollment on a particular CAR T-cell trial, in this case the CD22 CAR-T trial, may lead to a higher risk of infection than in those without these risk factors. Further investigations are underway to evaluate clinical outcomes with infection which occur in the peri CAR T-cell setting and potential strategies to minimize infection risk. Generalizability of this model will be tested in an independent data set. Disclosures Lee: Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Other: External Advisory Board; ACI Clinical on behalf of Celgene:: Other: Independent Central Quality Review Committee. Mackall:Obsidian: Research Funding; Lyell: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, Research Funding; Nektar: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; PACT: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Bryologyx: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Vor: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Adaptimmune LLC: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Allogene: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apricity Health: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Unum Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kochenderfer:Kite and Celgene: Research Funding; Bluebird and CRISPR Therapeutics: Other: received royalties on licensing of his inventions. OffLabel Disclosure: Conditioning chemotherapy for CAR T-cell therapy; this is a retrospective study that used different lymphodepletion regimens.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Kanza Naveed ◽  
Grace H Tang ◽  
McKenzie Quevillon ◽  
Filomena Meffe ◽  
Rachel Martin ◽  
...  

Background: Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal mortality. The risk of death from PPH is approximately 1 in 1000 deliveries(Carroli et al., 2008). Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a recommended treatment for women with severe PPH as it significantly reduces blood loss, need for surgical intervention and maternal mortality from hemorrhage (Abdul-Kadir et al., 2014; Ducloy-Bouthors et al., 2011; Li et al., 2017). Despite evidence supporting the use of TXA in this setting, there remain concerns and reluctance with its use stemming from the known increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women post-partum (Tepper et al., 2014; James, 2009). Much of the data on TXA use has come from studies conducted on women without a bleeding disorder. Women with inherited bleeding disorders are at a substantially greater risk of PPH with maternal mortality from PPH estimated to be 10 times higher than average(Abdul-Kadir et al., 2014; James & Jamison, 2007). The safety and efficacy of peri-partum use of TXA in this population warrants study given their increased baseline risk of PPH and lower risk of thromboembolism (James & Jamison, 2007; Martin & Key, 2016). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all women with inherited bleeding disorders known to our Multidisciplinary Clinic for Women with Inherited Bleeding Disorders (MCWBD) who received TXA peri-partum between July 2014 and December 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the frequency of VTE amongst patients with inherited bleeding disorders who received peri-partum TXA. The secondary objective was to evaluate the frequency of primary and secondary PPH among those who did and did not receive TXA. Research ethics board approval was obtained. Descriptive statistical analyses were used. Results: There were no VTE events in all MCWBD patients who received TXA peri-partum. A total of 40 patients with inherited bleeding disorders were managed from the beginning of pregnancy to labour and delivery under the care of the MCWBD between July 2014 and December 2019. The distribution of primary bleeding disorder diagnoses is 37.5% (15/40) for von Willebrand disease, 30% (12/40) had platelet function disorders, 22.5% (9/40) were symptomatic hemophilia carriers and 10% (4/40) had a rare factor deficiency (see Figure 1). Of these patients, 25% (10/40) had a personal previous history of PPH and 13% (5/40) had a family history of PPH. Among the 40 women, 75% (30/40) gave birth vaginally. TXA was provided to 95% (38/40) of patients at the onset of the second stage of labour, during the postpartum period (minimum of 10 days of oral TXA treatment), or both. Primary PPH occurred in 13% (5/38) of women who received prophylactic TXA and in 1 out 2 (50%) women without prophylactic TXA (see Table 1). There were no reports of secondary PPH. Conclusions: TXA appears to be a safe preventative treatment for PPH in patients with inherited bleeding disorders based on our retrospective study, with no additional risks of thromboembolism observed. Prospective evaluation of peripartum TXA use in this patient population is warranted to further assess its efficacy. Disclosures Martin: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP: Consultancy. Sholzberg:NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document