Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy versus traditional open surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer: Benefits and complications

Objective To compare the surgical effects and long-term efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and open surgery (OS) in radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer. Methods One hundred twenty-four patients who were admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the West War Zone General Hospital from May 2008 to April 2012 were randomly divided into a HALS group (n = 62) and an OS group (n = 62). After surgery, 113 patients were followed up for 5 and 8 years, and 11 patients were lost to follow-up. The 5- and 8-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 31.90% and 18.40% in the HALS group and 32.50% and 18.60% in the OS group, respectively. The 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were 21.50% and 13.00% in the HALS group and 21.90% and 13.10% in the OS group, respectively. No significant differences were found. Conclusion Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer has the advantages of less severe trauma, less intraoperative blood loss, more rapid postoperative recovery, and equivalent long-term efficacy compared with OS.

Download Full-text

Activity of daily living of elderly patients with gastric cancer after surgery.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.6588 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6588-6588

Author(s):

Ayako Okuyama ◽

Tomonori Mizutani ◽

Tetsuya Hamaguchi ◽

Takahiro Higashi ◽

Asao Ogawa

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Daily Living ◽

Readmission Rate ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Cancer Registries ◽

Activity Of Daily Living

6588 Background: Elderly patients are concerned with the physical burden of cancer treatments. This study aimed at investigating the reduction of the activity of daily living (ADL), length of hospital stay and readmission rate after surgery for gastric cancer. Methods: Insurance claim data linked with hospital-based cancer registries in Japan for gastric cancer patients diagnosed in 2015 from 431 hospitals was used. This data is expected to cover 49.0% of new cancer cases in Japan. To compare the effect of the treatment by age group, we analyzed the reduction of ADL between admission and discharge, length of hospital stay and readmission rate after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for patients with cT1N0M0, and open surgery for patients with cM0. Patients who aged 40 years or older with independent ADL at admission for their first-course treatment was included. ADL was assessed using Barthel index (0-100 points). ADL decrease by 10 points or more was identified as ADL reduction. Results: Overall, 25,521 patients receiving ESD/EMR and 10,527 patients receiving open surgery were identified. ADL reduction after ESD or EMR under 80 years old was less than 1%, while over 80 years old ADL reduction was more than 2.5%. Length of hospital stay (11 days) and unexpected readmission rate (2 to 3 %) was almost similar. ADL reduction after open surgery under 75 years old was less than 3%. This reduction rates have increased with age, 11.5% for over 85 years old. Length of hospital stay also tended to increase by age (21 days for under 65 years old, 29 days for over 85 years old). Unexpected readmission rate for over or 80 years old (1.4%) was slightly higher under 80 years old (less than 1%). Conclusions: The effect of ADL reduction after ESD/EMR was not so significant for patients over 80 years old. While ADL reduction after open surgery tended to increase for aged 80 years and older. Providing these information to elderly patients and their families can be important in deciding treatment options.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text