scholarly journals Advantages of b-mode ultrasound combined with strain elastography in differentiation of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis from malignant breast lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serdar ARSLAN ◽  
Fatih ÖNCÜ ◽  
Mehmet Ali ERYILMAZ ◽  
Mehmet Sedat DURMAZ ◽  
Ayşegül ALTUNKESER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Granulomatous Mastitis ◽  
Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Malignant Breast

scholarly journals Comparison of the SRmax, SRave, and color map of strain-elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Moon ◽  
Sung Hye Koh ◽  
Sun-Young Park ◽  
Ji-Young Hwang ◽  
Ji Young Woo
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Maximum Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Color Map

Background The maximum value of the strain ratio (SR) is a newly developed measure in strain-elastography. Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of three different measures of strain-elastography, the maximum value of the SR (SRmax), the average value of the SR (SRave), and the color map, for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Material and Methods We obtained the SRmax and SRave of 314 lesions from 290 patients with the tissue to nodule SR and color map using a five-degree scoring system. The diagnostic performances of the SRmax, SRave, and color map were compared after obtaining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) of each parameter. Results The AUC of the SRmax (0.7674) was larger than the AUCs of the SRave (0.7138) and color map (0.6324), with statistical significance ( P = 0.0383 for SRmax vs. SRave, P = 0.0000 for SRmax vs. color map). The AUC of the SRave was larger than that of the color map; however, there was no significant difference. The optimal cut-off point of the SRmax that balanced the sensitivity (91.12%) and specificity (50.81%) was 5.16. Conclusion The SRmax is a more reliable diagnostic tool than the SRave and color map for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

scholarly journals ROLE OF ULTRASOUND STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY FOR THE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS

2020 ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Deoyani S Sarjare ◽  
Arti Anand ◽  
Soumya Agrawal ◽  
Shanas K. P. ◽  
Sandhya Yeshwante
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Mammographic Screening ◽  
P Value ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Breast Lumps

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) elastography is an emerging technique that can be used during breast US examination. Guidelines recommend mammographic screening and US for diagnosis of breast cancer. The specificity of these techniques is not high enough to prevent unnecessary biopsies. Hence there is need for a more specific technique to overcome this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the value of strain elastography (SE) for breast lesions. Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional observational study over 18 months, 60 women with palpable breast lumps were evaluated with conventional US and SE. Results obtained were correlated with histopathological findings for statistical analysis. Result: A statistically significant correlation was found between SE and histopathological outcome with a p value of 0.03(<0.05). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 76.92% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 76.47% with Chi square= 8.4. Conclusion: Ultrasound with SE can substantially improve the possibility of differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions thereby limiting recourse to biopsy and considerably reducing the number of benign breast biopsy diagnoses.

scholarly journals Added value of strain elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions: A prospective study

Ultrasound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
Dimpi Sinha ◽  
Sukrity Sharma ◽  
Nischal G Kundaragi ◽  
Sudhir Kumar Kale
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast

Background Elastography is a new promising ultrasonographic technique which is used to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions based on the stiffness of the lesion. Purpose To determine the role of strain elastography in characterisation of breast lesions and to compare the diagnostic performances of strain elastography and conventional ultrasound (US). Methods In total, 113 breast lesions in 100 women were prospectively evaluated by US and strain elastography followed by the histopathological examination. Elastography score based on the Tsukuba colour scale and strain ratio were determined for each lesion. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for each modality and the diagnostic performances were compared. The best cut-off point was calculated for each of the elastography parameters using the receiver operator curve analysis. Results Out of the 113 lesions, 40 were malignant (35.4%) and 73 were benign (64.6%). The area under the curve for elastography score showed significant difference with that of US: 0.98 versus 0.90 (Difference = 0.08, p =0.02). The elastography parameters were more specific as compared to US (ES-95 and SR-93% vs. 63%, p < 0.05) with a high negative predictive value. The combined use of elastography and US gave better results with 95% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 94% accuracy and negative predictive value reaching 97%. Conclusion Strain elastography is a useful adjunct to conventional ultrasonography. The combined use of strain elastography and ultrasound improves the characterisation of breast lesions and helps in down-staging of assigned BI-RADS category, thereby avoiding unnecessary biopsies. ES is the most useful elastography parameter to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.

scholarly journals Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1509-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aykut GÜRÜF ◽  
Mesut ÖZTÜRK ◽  
İlkay Koray BAYRAK ◽  
Ahmet Veysel POLAT
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Wave Versus ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Versus Strain

US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Cantisani ◽  
Emanuele David ◽  
Richard G. Barr ◽  
Maija Radzina ◽  
Valeria de Soccio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) and 2 D shear wave elastography (SWE) and SE/SWE combination in comparison with conventional multiparametric ultrasound (US) with respect to improving BI-RADS classification results and differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions using a qualitative and quantitative assessment. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 130 histologically proven breast masses were evaluated with baseline US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), SE and SWE (Toshiba Aplio 500 with a 7–15 MHz wide-band linear transducer). Each lesion was classified according to the BIRADS lexicon by evaluating the size, the B-mode and color Doppler features, the SE qualitative (point color scale) and SE semi-quantitative (strain ratio) methods, and quantitative SWE. Histological results were compared with BIRADS, strain ratio (SR) and shear wave elastography (SWE) all performed by one investigator blinded to the clinical examination and mammographic results at the time of the US examination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-mode US, SE, SWE, and their combination. Results Histological examination revealed 47 benign and 83 malignant breast lesions. The accuracy of SR was statistically significantly higher than SWE (sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 89.2 %, 76.6 % and 0.83 for SR and 72.3 %, 66.0 % and 0.69 for SWE, respectively, p = 0.003) but not higher than B-mode US (B-mode US sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 85.5 %, 78.8 %, 0.821, respectively, p = 1.000). Conclusion Our experience suggests that conventional US in combination with both SE and SWE is a valid tool that can be useful in the clinical setting, can improve BIRADS category assessment and may help in the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, with SE having higher accuracy than SWE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document