US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Cantisani ◽  
Emanuele David ◽  
Richard G. Barr ◽  
Maija Radzina ◽  
Valeria de Soccio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) and 2 D shear wave elastography (SWE) and SE/SWE combination in comparison with conventional multiparametric ultrasound (US) with respect to improving BI-RADS classification results and differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions using a qualitative and quantitative assessment. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 130 histologically proven breast masses were evaluated with baseline US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), SE and SWE (Toshiba Aplio 500 with a 7–15 MHz wide-band linear transducer). Each lesion was classified according to the BIRADS lexicon by evaluating the size, the B-mode and color Doppler features, the SE qualitative (point color scale) and SE semi-quantitative (strain ratio) methods, and quantitative SWE. Histological results were compared with BIRADS, strain ratio (SR) and shear wave elastography (SWE) all performed by one investigator blinded to the clinical examination and mammographic results at the time of the US examination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-mode US, SE, SWE, and their combination. Results Histological examination revealed 47 benign and 83 malignant breast lesions. The accuracy of SR was statistically significantly higher than SWE (sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 89.2 %, 76.6 % and 0.83 for SR and 72.3 %, 66.0 % and 0.69 for SWE, respectively, p = 0.003) but not higher than B-mode US (B-mode US sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 85.5 %, 78.8 %, 0.821, respectively, p = 1.000). Conclusion Our experience suggests that conventional US in combination with both SE and SWE is a valid tool that can be useful in the clinical setting, can improve BIRADS category assessment and may help in the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, with SE having higher accuracy than SWE.

A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512096142
Author(s):  
Yasemin Altıntas ◽  
Mehmet Bayrak ◽  
Ömer Alabaz ◽  
Medih Celiktas
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Us Elastography

Background Ultrasound (US) elastography has become a routine instrument in ultrasonographic diagnosis that measures the consistency and stiffness of tissues. Purpose To distinguish benign and malignant breast masses using a single US system by comparing the diagnostic parameters of three kinds of breast elastography simultaneously added to B-mode ultrasonography. Material and Methods A total of 163 breast lesions in 159 consecutive women who underwent US-guided core needle biopsy were included in this prospective study. Before the biopsy, the lesions were examined with B-mode ultrasonography and strain (SE), shear wave (SWE), and point shear wave (STQ) elastography. The strain ratio was computed and the Tsukuba score determined. The mean elasticity values using SWE and STQ were computed and converted to Young’s modulus E (kPa). Results All SE, SWE, and STQ parameters showed similar diagnostic performance. The SE score, SE ratio, SWEmean, SWEmax, STQmean, and STQmax yielded higher specificity than B-mode US alone to differentiate benign and malignant masses. The sensitivity of B-mode US, SWE, and STQ was slightly higher than that of the SE score and SE ratio. The SE score, SE ratio, SWEmean, SWEmax, STQmean, and STQmax had significantly higher positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy than B-mode US alone. The area under the curve for each of these elastography methods in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions was 0.93, 0.93, 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.96, respectively; P<0.001 for all measurements. Conclusion SE (ratio and score), SWE, and STQ had higher diagnostic performance individually than B-mode US alone in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast masses.

scholarly journals Qualitative and quantitative strain and shear wave elastography paradigm in differentiation of breast lesions

2022 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roaa M. A. Shehata ◽  
Mostafa A. M. El-Sharkawy ◽  
Omar M. Mahmoud ◽  
Hosam M. Kamel
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common life-threatening cancer in women worldwide. A high number of women are going through biopsy procedures for characterization of breast masses every day and yet 75% of the pathological results prove these masses to be benign. Ultrasound (US) elastography is a non-invasive technique that measures tissue stiffness. It is convenient for differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors. Our study aims to evaluate the role of qualitative ultrasound elastography scoring (ES), quantitative mass strain ratio (SR), and shear wave elasticity ratio (SWER) in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. Results Among 51 female patients with 77 histopathologically proved breast lesions, 57 breast masses were malignant and 20 were benign. All patients were examined by B-mode ultrasound then strain and shear wave elastographic examinations using ultrasound machine (Logiq E9, GE Medical Systems) with 8.5–12 MHz high-frequency probes. Our study showed that ES best cut-off point > 3 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, accuracy was 94.7%, 85%, 94.7%, 85%, 90.9%, respectively, and AUC = 0.926 at P < 0.001, mass SR the best cut-off point > 4.6 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, accuracy was 96.5%, 80%, 93.2%, 88.9%, 92.2%, respectively, and AUC = 0.860 at P < 0.001, SWER the best cut-off value > 4.9 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP and accuracy was 91.2%, 80%, 92.9%, 76.2%, 93.5%, respectively, and AUC = 0.890 at P < 0.001. The mean mass strain ratio for malignant lesions is 10.1 ± 3.7 SD and for solid benign lesions 4.7 ± 4.3 SD (p value 0.001). The mean shear wave elasticity ratio for malignant lesions is 10.6 ± 5.4 SD and for benign (solid and cystic) lesions 3.6 ± 4.2 SD. Using ROC curve and Youden index, the difference in diagnostic performance between ES, SR and SWER was not significant in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions and also was non-significant difference when comparing them with conventional US alone. Conclusion ES, SR, and SWER have a high diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions with no statistically significant difference between them.

scholarly journals The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Yang ◽  
Yongyuan Xu ◽  
Yanan Zhao ◽  
Jing Yin ◽  
Zhiyi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Tissue Elasticity ◽  
Malignant Breast

Abstract Background Elastography is a promising way to evaluate tissue differences regarding stiffness, and the stiffness of the malignant breast lesions increased at the lesion margin. However, there is a lack of data on the value of the shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters of the surrounding tissue (shell) of different diameter on the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of shell elasticity in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using SWE. Methods Between September 2016 and June 2017, women with breast lesions underwent both conventional ultrasound (US) and SWE. Elastic values of the lesions peripheral tissue were determined according to the shell size, which was automatically drawn along the edge of the lesion using the following software guidelines: (1): 1 mm; (2): 2 mm; and (3): 3 mm. Quantitative elastographic features of the inner lesions and shell, including the elasticity mean (Emean), elasticity maximum (Emax), and elasticity minimum (Emin), were calculated using an online-available software. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of the elastographic features was analyzed to assess the diagnostic performance, and the area under curve (AUC) of each elastographic feature was obtained. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict significant factors of malignancy, permitting the design of predictive models. Results This prospective study included 63 breast lesions of 63 women. Of the 63 lesions, 33 were malignant and 30 were benign. The diagnostic performance of Emax-3shell was the highest (AUC = 0.76) with a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 83.3%. According to stepwise logistic regression analysis, the Emax-3shell and the Emin-3shell were significant predictors of malignancy (p < 0.05). The AUC of the predictive equation was 0.86. Conclusions SWE features, particularly the combination of Emax-3shell and Emin-3shell can improve the diagnosis of breast lesions.

The diagnostic performance of shear wave velocity ratio for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: Compared with VTQ, and mammography

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Li-Chang Zhong ◽  
Tian Yang ◽  
Li-Ping Gu ◽  
Fang Ma
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Surrounding Parenchyma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave velocity (SWV) ratio for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 151 breast lesions that were diagnosed by biopsy and surgical pathology. All of the breast lesions were detected by conventional ultrasound and Virtual Touch tissue quantification (VTQ) and mammography. The sonographic characteristics of the breast lesion, such as the internal echo, shape, margin, color flow, and calcification so on, were also observed. The SWV in lesions and surrounding parenchyma were measured and the SWV ratio between the lesion and surrounding parenchyma was calculated. Pathological results were used as a diagnosis standard to compare the value of SWV ratio, VTQ, and mammography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. RESULTS: The 151 breast lesions included 96 benign lesions and 55 malignant lesions. The cutoff value of VTQ in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions was 5.01 m/s, of SWV ratio was 2.43, and mammography was BI-RADS 4B. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the SWV ratio were 78.2%, 86.5%, 83.4%, and 0.83 respectively. While of SWV ratio with mammography was 86.4%, 89.4%, 88.3% and 0.87, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of SWV ratio and SWV ratio with mammography were statistically higher than those of mammography, no statistically higher than VTQ and VTQ with mammography. CONCLUSION: The SWV ratio can improve the sensitivity without sacrificing diagnostic specificity in the process of breast cancer diagnostic, provide a better diagnostic performance, and avoid unnecessary biopsy or surgery.

scholarly journals Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Moon ◽  
Ji-Young Hwang ◽  
Jeong Seon Park ◽  
Sung Hye Koh ◽  
Sun-Young Park
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Solid Lesions ◽  
The Impact

Background Shear wave elastography (SWE) using a region of interest (ROI) can demonstrate the quantitative elasticity of breast lesions. Purpose To prospectively evaluate the impact of two different ROI sizes on the diagnostic performance of SWE for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Material and Methods A total of 154 breast lesions were included. Two types of ROIs were investigated: one involving an approximately 2-mm diameter, small round ROIs placed over the stiffest area of the lesion, as determined by SWE (ROI-S); and another ROI drawn along the margin of the lesion using a touch pen or track ball to encompass the entire lesion (ROI-M). Maximum elasticity (Emax), mean elasticity (Emean), minimum elasticity (Emin), and standard deviation (SD) were measured for the two ROIs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as well as the sensitivity and specificity of each elasticity value were determined. Results The AUCs for ROI-S were higher than those for ROI-M when differentiating benign and malignant breast solid lesions. The Emax, Emean, Emin, and SD of the elasticity values for ROI-S were 0.865, 0.857, 0.816, and 0.849, respectively, and for ROI-M were 0.820, 0.780, 0.724, and 0.837, respectively. However, only Emax ( P = 0.0024) and Emean ( P = 0.0015) showed statistically significant differences. For ROI-S, the sensitivity and specificity of Emax were 78.8% and 84.3%, respectively, and those for Emean were 80.8% and 81.4%, respectively. Conclusion Using ROI-S with Emax and Emean has better diagnostic performance than ROI-M for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.

scholarly journals Elastic Modulus and Elasticity Ratio of Malignant Breast Lesions with Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography: Variations with Different Region of Interest and Lesion Size

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1015
Author(s):  
Antonio Bulum ◽  
Gordana Ivanac ◽  
Eugen Divjak ◽  
Iva Biondić Špoljar ◽  
Martina Džoić Dominković ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Small Diameter ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Ultrasound Elastography ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
The Impact

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a type of ultrasound elastography with which the elastic properties of breast tissues can be quantitatively assessed. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of different regions of interest (ROI) and lesion size on the performance of SWE in differentiating malignant breast lesions. The study included 150 female patients with histopathologically confirmed malignant breast lesions. Minimal (Emin), mean (Emean), maximal (Emax) elastic modulus and elasticity ratio (e-ratio) values were measured using a circular ROI size of 2, 4 and 6 mm diameters and the lesions were divided into large (diameter ≥ 15 mm) and small (diameter < 15 mm). Highest Emin, Emean and e-ratio values and lowest variability were observed when using the 2 mm ROI. Emax values did not differ between different ROI sizes. Larger lesions had significantly higher Emean and Emax values, but there was no difference in e-ratio values between lesions of different sizes. In conclusion, when measuring the Emin, Emean and e-ratio of malignant breast lesions using SWE the smallest possible ROI size should be used regardless of lesion size. ROI size has no impact on Emax values while lesion size has no impact on e-ratio values.

scholarly journals Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in identification of solid breast masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zheng ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Zhi-Dong Xuan ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Lei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Definitive Diagnosis ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Diagnostic Specificity ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background To explore the value of quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) plus the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the identification of solid breast masses. Methods A total of 108 patients with 120 solid breast masses admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were enrolled in this study. The pathological examination served as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Both SWE and BI-RADS grading were performed. Results Out of the 120 solid breast masses in 108 patients, 75 benign and 45 malignant masses were pathologically confirmed. The size, shape, margin, internal echo, microcalcification, lateral acoustic shadow, and posterior acoustic enhancement of benign and malignant masses were significantly different (all P < 0.05). The E mean, E max, SD, and E ratio of benign and malignant masses were significantly different (all P < 0.05). The E min was similar between benign and malignant masses (P > 0.05). The percentage of Adler grade II-III of the benign masses was lower than that of the malignant masses (P < 0.05). BI-RADS plus SWE yielded higher diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value than either BI-RADS or SWE; BI-RADS plus SWE yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy among the three methods (all P < 0.05). Conclusion SWE plus routine ultrasonography BI-RADS has a higher value in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses than color doppler or SWE alone, which should be further promoted in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Strain Elastography: A Valuable Additional Method to BI-RADS?

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (05) ◽  
pp. 526-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Bao Zhao ◽  
Ji-Yi Yao ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Shao-Yun Hao ◽  
Wen Mu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Ratio Method ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Histological Results

Abstract Background Breast lesions classified as BI-RADS-US 3 are probably benign and observation was recommended, while a considerable number of BI-RADS-US 4 lesions were benign, resulting in excessive biopsies. We focus exclusively on BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 lesions and hypothesize that improved diagnostic performance can be achieved by integrating real-time elastography (strain ratio) into the BI-RADS-US classification system. Method From April 2010 to September 2015, 1071 lesions were included in the final analysis. After the conventional ultrasound examination, the BI-RADS-US (2013) classification was used to evaluate the lesions. Then the strain ratios were calculated, and the final diagnosis was made on the basis of histological results. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were calculated and the AUCs were compared. Additionally, an analysis of the diagnostic performance expressed by the pretest and posttest probability of disease (POD) was performed in BI-RADS-US 3 and 4A lesions. Results With the cutoff point of 2.98, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the strain ratio method were 86.9 %, 86.6 % and 82.6 %, respectively. In BI-RADS-US 3 lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 1.3 % to a posttest POD of 29.8 %. In BI-RADS-US 4A lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 8.5 % to a posttest POD of 48.7 %. Conclusion Ultrasonographic elastography (strain ratio) yields additional diagnostic information in the evaluation of BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 breast lesions. The strain ratios should be integrated into the BI-RADS-US classification system and into daily practice.

Prospective Evaluation of Semiquantitative Strain Ratio and Quantitative 2D Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Association with TIRADS Classification for Thyroid Nodule Characterization

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 495-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Cantisani ◽  
Emanuele David ◽  
Hektor Grazhdani ◽  
Antonello Rubini ◽  
Maija Radzina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodule ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Ultrasound Elastography ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
2D Ultrasound

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain ratio elastography (SRE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) alone and in combination with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) classification parameters to improve differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods In this prospective study benign (n = 191) and malignant (n = 52) thyroid nodules were examined with high-resolution ultrasound (US) features using the TIRADS lexicon and SRE semiquantitative and SWE quantitative findings using histology or cytology as the gold standard with a 12-month follow-up. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each feature and combinations of the methods. Results TIRADS score showed a sensitivity of 59.6 %, a specificity of 83.8 % with an AUROC of 0.717, a PPV of 50.0 % and an NPV of 88.4 %. SRE yielded the highest performance with a sensitivity of 82.7 %, a specificity of 92.7 % with AUROC of 0.877, a PPV 75.4 % and an NPV of 95.2 %. SWE (kPa) had a sensitivity and specificity of 67.3 % and 82.7 %, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.750, a PPV of 51.5 % and an NPV of 90.3 %. Differences were significant for SRE only but not for SWE. Conclusion Ultrasound elastography may improve thyroid nodule discrimination. In particular, SRE has a better performance than TIRADS classification, while their combination improves sensitivity.

scholarly journals Comparison of the SRmax, SRave, and color map of strain-elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Moon ◽  
Sung Hye Koh ◽  
Sun-Young Park ◽  
Ji-Young Hwang ◽  
Ji Young Woo
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Maximum Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Color Map

Background The maximum value of the strain ratio (SR) is a newly developed measure in strain-elastography. Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of three different measures of strain-elastography, the maximum value of the SR (SRmax), the average value of the SR (SRave), and the color map, for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Material and Methods We obtained the SRmax and SRave of 314 lesions from 290 patients with the tissue to nodule SR and color map using a five-degree scoring system. The diagnostic performances of the SRmax, SRave, and color map were compared after obtaining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) of each parameter. Results The AUC of the SRmax (0.7674) was larger than the AUCs of the SRave (0.7138) and color map (0.6324), with statistical significance ( P = 0.0383 for SRmax vs. SRave, P = 0.0000 for SRmax vs. color map). The AUC of the SRave was larger than that of the color map; however, there was no significant difference. The optimal cut-off point of the SRmax that balanced the sensitivity (91.12%) and specificity (50.81%) was 5.16. Conclusion The SRmax is a more reliable diagnostic tool than the SRave and color map for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document