scholarly journals Comparison of the SRmax, SRave, and color map of strain-elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Moon ◽  
Sung Hye Koh ◽  
Sun-Young Park ◽  
Ji-Young Hwang ◽  
Ji Young Woo
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Maximum Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Color Map

Background The maximum value of the strain ratio (SR) is a newly developed measure in strain-elastography. Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of three different measures of strain-elastography, the maximum value of the SR (SRmax), the average value of the SR (SRave), and the color map, for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Material and Methods We obtained the SRmax and SRave of 314 lesions from 290 patients with the tissue to nodule SR and color map using a five-degree scoring system. The diagnostic performances of the SRmax, SRave, and color map were compared after obtaining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) of each parameter. Results The AUC of the SRmax (0.7674) was larger than the AUCs of the SRave (0.7138) and color map (0.6324), with statistical significance ( P = 0.0383 for SRmax vs. SRave, P = 0.0000 for SRmax vs. color map). The AUC of the SRave was larger than that of the color map; however, there was no significant difference. The optimal cut-off point of the SRmax that balanced the sensitivity (91.12%) and specificity (50.81%) was 5.16. Conclusion The SRmax is a more reliable diagnostic tool than the SRave and color map for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

scholarly journals Added value of strain elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions: A prospective study

Ultrasound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
Dimpi Sinha ◽  
Sukrity Sharma ◽  
Nischal G Kundaragi ◽  
Sudhir Kumar Kale
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast

Background Elastography is a new promising ultrasonographic technique which is used to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions based on the stiffness of the lesion. Purpose To determine the role of strain elastography in characterisation of breast lesions and to compare the diagnostic performances of strain elastography and conventional ultrasound (US). Methods In total, 113 breast lesions in 100 women were prospectively evaluated by US and strain elastography followed by the histopathological examination. Elastography score based on the Tsukuba colour scale and strain ratio were determined for each lesion. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for each modality and the diagnostic performances were compared. The best cut-off point was calculated for each of the elastography parameters using the receiver operator curve analysis. Results Out of the 113 lesions, 40 were malignant (35.4%) and 73 were benign (64.6%). The area under the curve for elastography score showed significant difference with that of US: 0.98 versus 0.90 (Difference = 0.08, p =0.02). The elastography parameters were more specific as compared to US (ES-95 and SR-93% vs. 63%, p < 0.05) with a high negative predictive value. The combined use of elastography and US gave better results with 95% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 94% accuracy and negative predictive value reaching 97%. Conclusion Strain elastography is a useful adjunct to conventional ultrasonography. The combined use of strain elastography and ultrasound improves the characterisation of breast lesions and helps in down-staging of assigned BI-RADS category, thereby avoiding unnecessary biopsies. ES is the most useful elastography parameter to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.

scholarly journals Qualitative and quantitative strain and shear wave elastography paradigm in differentiation of breast lesions

2022 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roaa M. A. Shehata ◽  
Mostafa A. M. El-Sharkawy ◽  
Omar M. Mahmoud ◽  
Hosam M. Kamel
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common life-threatening cancer in women worldwide. A high number of women are going through biopsy procedures for characterization of breast masses every day and yet 75% of the pathological results prove these masses to be benign. Ultrasound (US) elastography is a non-invasive technique that measures tissue stiffness. It is convenient for differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors. Our study aims to evaluate the role of qualitative ultrasound elastography scoring (ES), quantitative mass strain ratio (SR), and shear wave elasticity ratio (SWER) in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. Results Among 51 female patients with 77 histopathologically proved breast lesions, 57 breast masses were malignant and 20 were benign. All patients were examined by B-mode ultrasound then strain and shear wave elastographic examinations using ultrasound machine (Logiq E9, GE Medical Systems) with 8.5–12 MHz high-frequency probes. Our study showed that ES best cut-off point > 3 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, accuracy was 94.7%, 85%, 94.7%, 85%, 90.9%, respectively, and AUC = 0.926 at P < 0.001, mass SR the best cut-off point > 4.6 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP, accuracy was 96.5%, 80%, 93.2%, 88.9%, 92.2%, respectively, and AUC = 0.860 at P < 0.001, SWER the best cut-off value > 4.9 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP and accuracy was 91.2%, 80%, 92.9%, 76.2%, 93.5%, respectively, and AUC = 0.890 at P < 0.001. The mean mass strain ratio for malignant lesions is 10.1 ± 3.7 SD and for solid benign lesions 4.7 ± 4.3 SD (p value 0.001). The mean shear wave elasticity ratio for malignant lesions is 10.6 ± 5.4 SD and for benign (solid and cystic) lesions 3.6 ± 4.2 SD. Using ROC curve and Youden index, the difference in diagnostic performance between ES, SR and SWER was not significant in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions and also was non-significant difference when comparing them with conventional US alone. Conclusion ES, SR, and SWER have a high diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions with no statistically significant difference between them.

US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Cantisani ◽  
Emanuele David ◽  
Richard G. Barr ◽  
Maija Radzina ◽  
Valeria de Soccio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) and 2 D shear wave elastography (SWE) and SE/SWE combination in comparison with conventional multiparametric ultrasound (US) with respect to improving BI-RADS classification results and differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions using a qualitative and quantitative assessment. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 130 histologically proven breast masses were evaluated with baseline US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), SE and SWE (Toshiba Aplio 500 with a 7–15 MHz wide-band linear transducer). Each lesion was classified according to the BIRADS lexicon by evaluating the size, the B-mode and color Doppler features, the SE qualitative (point color scale) and SE semi-quantitative (strain ratio) methods, and quantitative SWE. Histological results were compared with BIRADS, strain ratio (SR) and shear wave elastography (SWE) all performed by one investigator blinded to the clinical examination and mammographic results at the time of the US examination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-mode US, SE, SWE, and their combination. Results Histological examination revealed 47 benign and 83 malignant breast lesions. The accuracy of SR was statistically significantly higher than SWE (sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 89.2 %, 76.6 % and 0.83 for SR and 72.3 %, 66.0 % and 0.69 for SWE, respectively, p = 0.003) but not higher than B-mode US (B-mode US sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 85.5 %, 78.8 %, 0.821, respectively, p = 1.000). Conclusion Our experience suggests that conventional US in combination with both SE and SWE is a valid tool that can be useful in the clinical setting, can improve BIRADS category assessment and may help in the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, with SE having higher accuracy than SWE.

scholarly journals Can Strain Elastography Predict Malignancy of Soft Tissue Tumors in a Tertiary Sarcoma Center?

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cohen ◽  
Iben Riishede ◽  
Jonathan Frederik Carlsen ◽  
Trine-Lise Lambine ◽  
Mikkel Seidelin Dam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Valuable Adjunct ◽  
Malignant Soft Tissue Tumor ◽  
Significant Difference

This study aims to investigate the ability of ultrasound strain elastography as an adjunct to predict malignancy in soft tissue tumors suspect of sarcoma or metastasis in a tertiary reference center for sarcoma. A total of 137 patients were included prospectively. Patients were referred on the basis of clinical or radiological suspicion of malignant soft tissue tumor. All patients had previously undergone diagnostic imaging (MRI, CT or PET-CT). After recording strain elastography cine loops, ultrasound guided biopsy was performed. Three investigators, who were blinded to final diagnosis, reviewed all elastograms retrospectively. For each elastogram, a qualitative, visual 5-point score was decided in consensus and a strain ratio was calculated. Final pathology obtained from biopsy or tumor resection served as gold standard. Eighty-one tumors were benign, and 56 were malignant. t-tests showed a significant difference in mean visual score between benign and malignant tumors. There was no significant difference in mean strain ratio between the two groups. Strain elastography may be a valuable adjunct to conventional B-mode ultrasound, perhaps primarily in primary care, when considering whether to refer to a sarcoma center or to biopsy, although biopsies cannot reliably be ruled out based on the current data.

Average versus Maximum Grip Strength: Which is more Consistent?

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. HAIDAR ◽  
D. KUMAR ◽  
R. S. BASSI ◽  
S. C. DESHMUKH
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Average Method ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Strength Assessment ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Maximum Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maximum Grip Strength ◽  
Maximum Method ◽  
Maximum Grip

The average of three consecutive measurements is the most frequently used method for grip strength assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare the consistency of the maximum value with that of the average value of three consecutive measurements of grip strength. One hundred healthy volunteers participated in this study. Three measurements of grip strength were taken on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. For each hand, two average values and two maximum values were obtained. Ninety-five per cent limits of agreement for the average method were – 8.3 (−23%) to +7.2 (+20%) kg and for the maximum method were – 8.8 (−23%) to + 8 (+21%) kg. Both methods of grip strength assessment were found to be highly consistent with no statistically significant difference.

scholarly journals ROLE OF ULTRASOUND STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY FOR THE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS

2020 ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Deoyani S Sarjare ◽  
Arti Anand ◽  
Soumya Agrawal ◽  
Shanas K. P. ◽  
Sandhya Yeshwante
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Mammographic Screening ◽  
P Value ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Breast Lumps

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) elastography is an emerging technique that can be used during breast US examination. Guidelines recommend mammographic screening and US for diagnosis of breast cancer. The specificity of these techniques is not high enough to prevent unnecessary biopsies. Hence there is need for a more specific technique to overcome this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the value of strain elastography (SE) for breast lesions. Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional observational study over 18 months, 60 women with palpable breast lumps were evaluated with conventional US and SE. Results obtained were correlated with histopathological findings for statistical analysis. Result: A statistically significant correlation was found between SE and histopathological outcome with a p value of 0.03(<0.05). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 76.92% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 76.47% with Chi square= 8.4. Conclusion: Ultrasound with SE can substantially improve the possibility of differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions thereby limiting recourse to biopsy and considerably reducing the number of benign breast biopsy diagnoses.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1260
Author(s):  
Hee-Seon Yoo ◽  
Wu-Seong Kang ◽  
Jung-Soo Pyo ◽  
Junghan Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Breast Mass ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Regression Test ◽  
Benign Breast Lesions ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Mass Lesions

Background and Objective: Breast mass lesions are common; however, determining the malignant potential of the lesion can be ambiguous. Recently, to evaluate breast mass lesions, vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) biopsy has been widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic role of VAE. Materials and Methods: Relevant articles were obtained by searching PubMed and EMBASE on September 3, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios and proportions. To assess heterogeneity, we conducted a subgroup analysis and meta-regression tests. Results: Finally, 26 studies comprising 18,170 patients were included. All of these were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that the complete resection rate of VAE was 0.930. In the meta-regression test, there was no significant difference. The meta-analysis showed a recurrence rate of 0.039 in the VAE group. The meta-regression test showed no statistical significance. Postoperative hematoma, pain, and ecchymosis after VAE were 0.092, 0.082, and 0.075, respectively. Conclusion: VAE for benign breast lesions showed favorable outcomes with respect to complete resection and complications. This meta-analysis suggested that VAE for low-risk benign breast lesions is a reasonable option for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

scholarly journals A PILOT STUDY FOR EVALUATION OF ROLE OF B-MODE ULTRASOUND AND STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST MASSES

2021 ◽  
pp. 153-163
Author(s):  
SARYU GUPTA ◽  
MANPREET KAUR ◽  
AMARJIT KAUR ◽  
KULDEEP BHATIA
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lump ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Strain Elastography ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Palpable Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Early detection of malignant lesions is critical key stone for the successful management of breast cancer. Conventional B-mode ultrasound although could not replace the histopathology which is still gold standard, plays an important role in the diagnostic pathways by using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) lexicon (standardized by American College of Radiology [ACR]). Although characterization of solid breast masses by sonography has improved greatly since the early 1990s, specificity remains low and a large number of biopsies result in benign diagnosis. Strain elastography and strain ratio (SR) are recent techniques which may help in increasing the specificity of ultrasound. Methods: The present study was a pilot study aimed to establish a correlation between B-mode ultrasound and strain elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses and to compare the results of B- mode ultrasound and Strain Elastography with fine-needle aspiration cytology/ biopsy findings. It was a prospective study conducted in the Department of Radio-diagnosis of Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. A total of 40 patients who presented with the complaint of palpable breast lump were evaluated with B-Mode Ultrasonography (USG) and Strain elastography (using elastography score [ES] and SR). Results: The study group (40 patients with breast lumps) comprised 38 (95%) female patients and 2 (5%) male patients. Among the group 29 were benign and 11 were malignant. Fibroadenoma followed by fibrocystic disease was the most common benign pathologies and invasive ductal carcinoma followed by Ductal Carcinoma in situ was the most common malignant pathologies. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of B-Mode USG in diagnosing palpable breast lump are 72.7%, 86.2%, and 82.5%, respectively, while that of strain elastography in diagnosing palpable breast lump are 81.8%, 93.10%, and 90.0%, respectively. Using strain ratio (SR) only the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy was found to be 93.1%, 100%, and 95% better than B-Mode USG and shear elastography alone separately and combined. The mean SR for a benign mass is 2.00±0.97 and for a malignant mass is 5.40±1.55. Conclusion: Ultrasound elastography (using ES) has a higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses then B mode USG (using BIRADS). Using SR alone has shown better sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy but its standalone or in combination diagnostic application has to be followed up with further studies.

ROLE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ELASTOGRAPHY IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST MASSES AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO CLASSICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 48-50
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar Verma ◽  
Rashmi Rashmi ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Verma ◽  
Mahendra Kumar Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Imaging Department ◽  
Malignant Breast

Introduction: India is experiencing an unprecedented rise in the number of breast cancer cases across all sections of society. Breast cancer is now the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer- related mortality. Breast cancer is quite easily and effectively treated, provided it is detected in it's early stages. There is a drastic drop in the survival rates when women present with advanced stage of breast cancer, regardless of the setting. Unfortunately, women in resource-poor and developing countries, like India, generally present at a later stage of disease than women elsewhere, partly due to the absence of effective awareness programs and partly due to the lack of proper mass screening programs Aims And Objectives: The diagnostic performance of elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. To assess whether elastography has the potential to reduce the need for breast biopsy /FNAC. Cut off value of Strain Ratio for benign versus malignant breast lesions. Further characterize BI-RADS 3 lesions using elastography Materials And Methods: The study was approved by the GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE AND LLR HOSPITAL Ethics Committee. All patients that presented to the Radiology and Imaging Department of LLR HOSPITAL for diagnostic work up for breast pathology were included in the study. After obtaining a written and signed informed consent from all patients, they were subjected to conventional B-Mode ultrasonography followed by elastography. All diagnostic breast imaging was done with Samsung RS80A ultrasound machine using linear array transducer of frequency 5-12MHz.Observations & Results: The elastography patterns for each lesion were assessed and documented in color scale. Color images were constructed automatically and displayed as a color-overlay on the B-mode image. The color pattern of each lesion was then evaluated on a scale of 1-5 according to the Tsukuba elasticity scoring system. Conclusion: Strain Ratio cutoff of 3.3 is a sensitive parameter to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Elastography is a specic test for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The combined use of elasticity score, strain ratio and B- Mode sonographyincreases the diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document