The Social Determinants of Health, COVID-19, and Structural Competence

Author(s):  
Catherine Robichaux ◽  
Jeanie Sauerland

The coronavirus pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations. As a result, the confluence of this pandemic, massive unemployment, and civil unrest has refocused attention on social determinants of health (SDOH), including racism, in the United States as a whole and specifically in healthcare. This article will discuss COVID-19 and the social determinants of health in the context of the historical focus and future directions of the nursing profession to consider these contributing factors, social justice in society, and the ethical mandate for nurses to address these issues. The authors provide recommendations to support the development of structural competence to address racism and inclusion of the SDOH information in education, policy, and practice. Suggestions for research to inform and prevent the inequities manifested in the current pandemic, and in the future, are included.

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 838-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Dawes

There is much discourse and focus on the social determinants of health, but undergirding these multiple intersecting and interacting determinants are legal and political determinants that have operated at every level and impact the entire life continuum. The United States has long grappled with advancing health equity via public law and policy. Seventy years after the country was founded, lawmakers finally succeeded in passing the first comprehensive and inclusive law aimed at tackling the social determinants of health, but that effort was short-lived. Today the United States is faced with another fork in the road relative to the advancement of health equity. This article draws on lessons from history and law to argue that researchers, providers, payers, lawmakers and the legal community have a moral, economic and national security imperative to address not only the negative outcomes of health disparities, but also the imbalance of inputs resulting from laws and policies which fail to employ an equity lens.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatole Manzi ◽  
Phaedra Henley ◽  
Hannah Lieberman ◽  
Langley Topper ◽  
Bernice Wuethrich ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had disproportionate impacts across race, social class, and geography. Insufficient attention has been paid to addressing the massive inequities worsened by COVID-19. In July 2020, Partners In Health (PIH) and the University of Global Health Equity (UGHE) designed a four-module short course, “An Equity Approach to Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Emerging Insights from COVID-19 Global Response Leaders.” We describe the design and use of a case-based, short-course education model to transfer knowledge and skills in equity approaches to pandemic preparedness and response.MethodsThis course used case studies of Massachusetts and Navajo Nation in the U.S, and Rwanda to highlight examples of equity-centered pandemic response. A post-session assessment survey was completed by course participants after each of the four modules. A mixed-method analysis was conducted to understand knowledge acquisition on key topics and assess participants’ experience and satisfaction with the course. Additionally, a landscape analysis was conducted to identify other equity-centered courses for pandemic response offered previously and to compare the content, audience, and intended outcomes.Results Forty-four percent of participants identified, “Immediate need for skills and information to address COVID-19” as their primary reason for attending the course. Participants reported that they are very likely (4.75 out of 5) to use the information, tools, or skills from the course in their work. The average score for content related questions answered correctly was 82-88% for each session. Participants (~70-90%) said their understanding was Excellent or Very Good for each session. Participants expressed a deepened understanding of the importance of prioritizing vulnerable communities and built global solidarity.ConclusionParticipants viewed the training as highly relevant, well-presented, actionable, shareable, and contributed to a new level of understanding of the social determinants of health and equity issues surrounding pandemic preparedness, crisis response, and long-term population recovery. This course offered a clear analysis of the impact of racism on the pandemic in the United States, the intersection of racism and wealth inequality; the role of the social determinants of health in pandemic preparedness, outcomes and response; and the impacts of neocolonialism on pandemic response in low- and middle-income countries.


Author(s):  
John Frank ◽  
Thomas Abel ◽  
Stefano Campostrini ◽  
Sarah Cook ◽  
Vivian K. Lin ◽  
...  

Twelve years have now passed since the influential WHO Report on the Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) in 2008. A group of senior international public health scholars and decision-makers met in Italy in mid-2019 to review the legacy of the SDoH conceptual framework and its adequacy for the many challenges facing our field as we enter the 2020s. Four major categories of challenges were identified: emerging “exogenous” challenges to global health equity, challenges related to weak policy and practice implementation, more fundamental challenges related to SDoH theory and research, and broader issues around modern research in general. Each of these categories is discussed, and potential solutions offered. We conclude that although the SDoH framework is still a worthy core platform for public health research, policy, and practice, the time is ripe for significant evolution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Max Gakh, JD, MPH

The Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach presents different and often complementary avenues to address the social determinants of health. But at its core, HiAP relies on collaborations to make health a governmental priority across sectors. In the United States, HiAP efforts can involve multiple levels of government and strategies that may vary in formality. In some states, state-level HiAP efforts may be advanced by gubernatorial executive orders (GEOs). GEOs are often used to promote health. GEOs may be powerful in the HiAP context because of their potential to manage the different sectors that comprise state government and thereby address the social determinants of health. By synthesizing the relevant literature and providing illustrative examples of HiAPpromoting GEOs, this review explores how, why, and whether to use GEOs for HiAP. It demonstrates that GEOs may advance HiAP with or without using a HiAP label, along different steps in the policymaking cycle, and by addressing common HiAP challenges. Champions of HiAP should therefore examine the possible utility of GEOs to promote state-level HiAP efforts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document