scholarly journals Efficacy of Various Wavelengths of Monochromatic Light Emitting Diode Illumination on Growth and Performance of Broiler Chickens

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 475-480
Author(s):  
M. B. Leigh ◽  
T. B. McFadden ◽  
L. Schumacher ◽  
J.D. Firman
2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-623
Author(s):  
Shabiha Sultana ◽  
Md. Rakibul Hassan ◽  
Byung Soo Kim ◽  
Kyeong Seon Ryu

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different monochromatic light-emitting diode colours on the behaviour and welfare of broiler chicks. A total of 750 one-day-old chicks were used and lighting was set up as follows: pure blue (PB, 440–450 nm), bright blue (460–470 nm), sky blue (480–490 nm), greenish blue (500–510 nm), and green (530–540), while fluorescent white (400–700 nm) was used as a control. Birds were placed into 30 independent light proof pens and each light treatment was replicated five times with 25 birds in each pen. Video was recorded and behaviour was evaluated twice per day and observed five consecutive days in a week. Broiler welfare was evaluated using the characteristics of gait score, tibia dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility duration, and heterophil:lymphocyte ratio. In results, sitting, walking, and ground pecking behaviour were influenced by the light colour from 0 to 7 d. Extending the rearing period from 8 to 21 d resulted in increased sitting behaviour and decreased walking and pecking behaviour in chicks in the PB treatment (P < 0.05). When the growth period was extended further (22–42 d), sitting behaviour increased when chicks were exposed to PB light (P < 0.05). The effect of light colour did not significantly influence welfare of broiler chicks. Thus, the present results suggest that PB light colour decreased broiler chickens movement and thus increased duration of sitting behaviour. These results would be helpful to choose light colour for broiler producers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 062101
Author(s):  
Sung-Youp Lee ◽  
Myung-Rak Son ◽  
Byong-Wook Shin ◽  
Do-Eok Kim ◽  
Byoung-Ho Kang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
MM AlShaafi ◽  
JE Harlow ◽  
HL Price ◽  
FA Rueggeberg ◽  
D Labrie ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Recently, “budget” dental light-emitting diode (LED)–based light-curing units (LCUs) have become available over the Internet. These LCUs claim equal features and performance compared to LCUs from major manufacturers, but at a lower cost. This study examined radiant power, spectral emission, beam irradiance profiles, effective emission ratios, and the ability of LCUs to provide sustained output values during the lifetime of a single, fully charged battery. Three examples of each budget LCU were purchased over the Internet (KY-L029A and KY-L036A, Foshan Keyuan Medical Equipment Co, and the Woodpecker LED.B, Guilin Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co). Major dental manufacturers provided three models: Elipar S10 and Paradigm (3M ESPE) and the Bluephase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent). Radiant power emissions were measured using a laboratory-grade thermopile system, and the spectral emission was captured using a spectroradiometer system. Irradiance profiles at the tip end were measured using a modified laser beam profiler, and the proportion of optical tip area that delivered in excess of 400 mW/cm2 (termed the effective emission ratio) was displayed using calibrated beam profile images. Emitted power was monitored over sequential exposures from each LCU starting at a fully charged battery state. The results indicated that there was less than a 100-mW/cm2 difference between manufacturer-stated average tip end irradiance and the measured output. All the budget lights had smaller optical tip areas, and two demonstrated lower effective emission ratios than did the units from the major manufacturers. The budget lights showed discontinuous values of irradiance over their tip ends. One unit delivered extremely high output levels near the center of the light tip. Two of the budget lights were unable to maintain sustained and stable light output as the battery charge decreased with use, whereas those lights from the major manufacturers all provided a sustained light output for at least 100 exposures as well as visual and audible indications that the units required recharging.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Whitelaw ◽  
J. Peter ◽  
H. Sohn ◽  
D. Viljoen ◽  
G. Theron ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diyan Li ◽  
Long Zhang ◽  
Mingyao Yang ◽  
Huadong Yin ◽  
Huailiang Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document