Weight Bearing as Tolerated After Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Orthopedics ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
David Deliberato ◽  
Devon M. Myers ◽  
Benjamin Schnee ◽  
Benjamin C. Taylor ◽  
Braden J. Passias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

scholarly journals Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fractures: Which is Better, Intra-medullary Nailing or Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Kawalkar Abhijit Chandrakant ◽  
Badole Chandrashekher Martand
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Early Weight Bearing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
Distal Tibia Fractures

Introduction Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPPO technique. Methods The study was conducted between Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. 63 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results 31 patients were treated with intramedullary nail & 32 with MIPPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPPO group. Conclusion Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures & helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of 3D Printed Total Talus Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0037
Author(s):  
Daniel Scott ◽  
John Steele ◽  
Amanda Fletcher ◽  
Selene Parekh
Keyword(s):  
Avascular Necrosis ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Ankle Motion ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Vas Scores

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, Hindfoot, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Patients with talar avascular necrosis have limited treatment options to manage their symptoms. Historically, surgical options have been limited and can leave patients with little ankle motion and have high failure rates. The use of custom 3D printed total talar replacements (TTR) has arisen as a treatment option for these patients, possibly allowing for better preservation of hind-foot motion. Patients undergoing TTR will demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in FAOS scores at one year after surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 15 patients who underwent a TTR over 2 years. Patient outcomes were reviewed including age, sex, comorbidities, etiology of talar pathology, number and type of prior surgeries, pre-operative and post-operative weight bearing radiographs, as well as FAOS and VAS scores, and range of motion. Data analysis performed with student T-test and multivariate regression. Results: Results: FAOS scores showed statistically significant improvements post-operatively as compared to pre-operative scores. There was a statistically significant decrease in VAS pain scores from 7.0 pre-operatively to 3.4 post operatively. There was no significant difference in pre-operative and post-operative coronal and sagittal alignment on weight bearing radiographs. All FAOS sub-score shows statistically significant improvements, with the exception of the sports/recreation sub-scale, did show a trend towards improved outcomes (p =0.19). Average follow-up was 12.8 months. Conclusion: Our hypothesis was confirmed that these patients show statistically significant improvements in AOFS and VAS scores at 1 year. Sagittal and coronal alignment was well maintained at an average of 1 year following surgery. TTR represents an exciting treatment options for patients with talar avascular necrosis, though longer-term follow-up is needed.

scholarly journals Suture anchor stabilization of symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescents: Clinical and radiographic outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902091894
Author(s):  
Masataka Kakihana ◽  
Yuki Tochigi ◽  
Takayuki Yamazaki ◽  
Masanori Ohashi ◽  
Satoru Ozeki
Keyword(s):  
Tilt Angle ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Accessory Navicular ◽  
Stabilization Technique

Background: Screw fixation used in modified Kidner procedures to treat persistent symptomatic accessory navicular in adult cases is often challenging in adolescent cases with a small accessory fragment. The present study aimed to document the clinical effect of a suture anchor stabilization technique applicable to such cases where osteosynthesis is considered an ideal outcome. Methods: Consecutive clinical cases who received this surgical treatment from 2009 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The focus of interest included radiographic union of the accessory bone, changes in symptoms evaluated using a validated clinical outcome scale introduced by the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot, and changes in the medial arch bony alignment measured in lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs. Results: Twenty-two feet in 15 individuals (11 females and 4 males, age at surgery 10–16 years) were identified. In 14 feet (64%), radiographic bone union was confirmed within 8 weeks postoperatively. At the final follow-up ranging 12–51 months postoperation, the clinical scores have significantly improved ( p < 0.001) to 96 ± 5.71 (mean ± standard deviation, range 87–100), from 54 preoperatively. Radiographic measurements revealed significant postoperative increase of the sagittal talar tilt angle ( p < 0.001, increment 4 ± 3°, range 0–11) and the talo-first metatarsal angle ( p < 0.001, increment 5 ± 4°, range 0–12). No significant changes were identified in the calcaneal pitch angle, first metatarsal tilt angle, calcaneo-navicular angle, and the navicular height. Conclusion: Despite the modest bone union rate, the clinical outcomes suggest distinct symptom-relieving effect, at least in the short- to midterm, while the radiographic measurements suggest positive biomechanical effects. The present suture-anchor stabilization concept appears to be a promising treatment option for persistent symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescent cases.

scholarly journals Screw Versus Suture Button in Treatment of Syndesmosis Instability: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Using PROMIS and Weight Bearing CT Scan

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0008
Author(s):  
Mohamed E. Abdelaziz ◽  
Noortje Hagemeijer ◽  
Daniel Guss ◽  
Ahmed El-Hawary ◽  
A. Holly Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Pilon Fracture ◽  
P Values ◽  
Normal Side ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Injured Side

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma, Syndesmosis Introduction/Purpose: Traumatic injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are relatively common and can be associated with ankle fractures or occur as purely ligamentous injuries. Unstable syndesmotic injuries require surgical repair, generally performed using either screw or suture button fixation. The superiority of either fixation method remains a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of this study is to compare both clinical and radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmosis instability using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (ROMIS) and weight bearing CT scan (WBCT). Methods: Medical records were reviewed to identify patients who had a unilateral syndesmotic injury requiring surgical stabilization and who were at least one year out from injury. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old, ipsilateral pilon fracture, history of contralateral ankle or pilon fracture or syndesmosis injury, BMI >40, and any neurological impairment. Twenty eligible patients were recruited to complete PROMIS questionnaires and undergo bilateral WBCT scan of both ankles, divided into two groups. In the first group (n=10) the patients had undergone screw fixation of the syndesmosis, while in the second group (n=10) the syndesmosis was fixed using a suture button construct. All patients completed PROMIS questionnaires for pain intensity, pain interference, physical function and depression. Radiographic assessment was performed using axial images of WBCT scan of both the injured ankle and the contralateral normal side at a level one cm proximal to the tibial plafond (Figure 1). Results: At an average follow up of three years, none of the recruited patients required a revision surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the four PROMIS questionnaires (P values ranged from 0.17 to 0.43). In the suture button group, the measurements of the injured side were significantly different from the normal side for the syndesmotic area (P=0.003), fibular rotation (P=0.004), anterior difference (P=0.025) and direct anterior difference (P=0.035). Other measurements of posterior difference, middle difference, direct posterior difference and fibular translation were not significantly different (P values ranged from 0.36 to 0.99). In the screw fixation group, the syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement in the injured side as compared to the normal side (P=0.006). Conclusion: Screw and suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability have similar clinical outcomes at average three years follow up as measured by PROMIS scores. Both screw and suture button did not entirely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral normal ankle, suggesting some residual diastasis on weight bearing CT. In addition, as compared to screw fixation, the suture button did not seem to restore the normal fibular rotation, with residual external rotation of the fibula noted. Longer clinical follow up is necessary to understand the clinical implication of such malreduction.

A Retrospective Radiographic Evaluation of a Modified Method of Lateral Column Lengthening

2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002091918
Author(s):  
Keith Wapner ◽  
Erik Freeland ◽  
Gregory Kirwan ◽  
Keith Baldwin
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Lateral Column ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Lateral Column Lengthening

Background: Lateral column lengthening (LCL) is a commonly performed procedure for patients with stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) to correct forefoot abduction. This procedure is frequently completed concomitantly with both soft-tissue and bony procedures, including a medial slide calcaneal osteotomy to further reduce hindfoot valgus. The purpose of this study is to investigate and identify the radiographic outcomes of a modified step-cut LCL utilized as an alternative approach for correction of stage II AAFD. Methods: A retrospective radiographic review was performed on 15 feet in 14 patients who underwent correction of stage II AAFD using a step-cut LCL between August 2009 and January 2012. Two independent examiners utilizing 6 radiographic parameters evaluated preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing radiographs of the foot. Results: At a mean follow-up of 13.4 (range 12-16) weeks, weight-bearing radiographs demonstrated a significant median decrease in the lateral talometatarsal angle of 14.4° (P < .001), lateral talocalcaneal angle of 7° (P < .001), anteroposterior talometatarsal angle of 14.5° (P < .001), anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle of 5.5° (P < .001), and talonavicular coverage angle of 26.5° (P < .001). Additionally, a significant median increase in calcaneal pitch of 8.5° (P < .001) was noted. Conclusion: This study demonstrates statistically significant improvement of radiographic outcomes with use of a modified step-cut LCL as an alternative approach for correction of stage II AAFD. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

Syndesmotic Fixation Utilizing a Novel Screw: A Retrospective Case Series Reporting Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Stenquist ◽  
Brian T. Velasco ◽  
Patrick K. Cronin ◽  
Jorge Briceño ◽  
Christopher P. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Break Point ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Case Series ◽  
Screw Breakage ◽  
Tissue Stabilization

Background. Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 20% of ankle fractures and requires anatomical reduction and stabilization to maximize outcomes. Although screw breakage is often asymptomatic, the breakage location can be unpredictable and result in painful bony erosion. The purpose of this investigation is to report early clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation using a novel metal screw designed with a controlled break point. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation utilizing the R3lease Tissue Stabilization System (Paragon 28, Denver, CO) over a 12-month period. Demographic and screw-specific data were obtained. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed, and radiographic parameters were measured. Screw loosening or breakage was documented. Results. 18 patients (24 screws) met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 11.7 months (range = 6.0-14.7 months). 5/24 screws (21%) fractured at the break point. No screw fractured at another location, nor did any fracture prior to resumption of weight bearing; 19 screws did not fracture, with 8/19 intact screws (42.1%) demonstrating loosening. There was no evidence of syndesmotic diastasis or mortise malalignment on final follow-up. No screws required removal during the study period. Conclusion. This study provides the first clinical data on a novel screw introduced specifically for syndesmotic fixation. At short-term follow up, there were no complications and the R3lease screw provided adequate fixation to allow healing and prevent diastasis. Although initial results are favorable, longer-term follow-up with data on cost comparisons and rates of hardware removal are needed to determine cost-effectiveness relative to similar implants. Level of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

scholarly journals Screw Versus Suture Button in Treatment of Syndesmosis Instability: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Using PROMIS and Weight Bearing CT Scan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0000
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelaziz ◽  
Daniel Guss ◽  
Anne H. Johnson ◽  
Christopher DiGiovanni ◽  
Noortje Hagemeijer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Pilon Fracture ◽  
P Values ◽  
Normal Side ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Injured Side

Category: Trauma; Ankle; Sports Introduction/Purpose: Traumatic injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are relatively common and can be associated with ankle fractures or occur as purely ligamentous injuries. Unstable syndesmotic injuries require surgical repair, generally performed using either screw or suture button fixation. The superiority of either fixation method remains a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of this study is to compare both clinical and radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmosis instability using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and weight bearing CT scan (WBCT). Methods: Medical records were reviewed to identify patients who had a unilateral syndesmotic injury requiring surgical stabilization and who were at least one year out from injury. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old, ipsilateral pilon fracture, history of contralateral ankle or pilon fracture or syndesmosis injury, BMI >40, and any neurological impairment. Twenty eligible patients were recruited to complete PROMIS questionnaires and undergo bilateral WBCT scan of both ankles, divided into two groups. In the first group (n=10) the patients had undergone screw fixation of the syndesmosis, while in the second group (n=10) the syndesmosis was fixed using a suture button construct. All patients completed PROMIS questionnaires for pain intensity, pain interference, physical function and depression. Radiographic assessment was performed using axial images of WBCT scan of both the injured ankle and the contralateral normal side at a level one cm proximal to the tibial plafond ( Figure 1 ). Results: At an average follow up of three years, none of the recruited patients required a revision surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the four PROMIS questionnaires (P values ranged from 0.17 to 0.43). In the suture button group, the measurements of the injured side were significantly different from the normal side for the syndesmotic area (P=0.003), fibular rotation (P=0.004), anterior difference (P=0.025) and direct anterior difference (P=0.035). Other measurements of posterior difference, middle difference, direct posterior difference and fibular translation were not significantly different (P values ranged from 0.36 to 0.99). In the screw fixation group, the syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement in the injured side as compared to the normal side (P=0.006). Conclusion: Screw and suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability have similar clinical outcomes at average three years follow up as measured by PROMIS scores. Both screw and suture button did not entirely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral normal ankle, suggesting some residual diastasis on weight bearing CT. In addition, as compared to screw fixation, the suture button did not seem to restore the normal fibular rotation, with residual external rotation of the fibula noted. Longer clinical follow up is necessary to understand the clinical implication of such malreduction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document