Nursing Student Perspective of Learning in a Clinical Setting

1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret E Wilson
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Mohammad Hatamleh ◽  
Hashem Ali Issa Almuslamani

This article aims to critique a published paper according to UK professional Standard Framework (UKPSF). The critiqued paper in this article was written by Loftin, Davis, and Hartin (2010) that provide clarity and meaning for classroom participation from the nursing student perspective at West Texas A&M University. The article shows that the title of the published paper was not reflected the purpose of the study, the literature review, and the results. Besides that, the critiqued paper provided clarity and meaning of the classroom participation, but the results explained the factors behind the reluctance of the student in the participation. This article contributes to the body of the knowledge in higher education and provides valuable facts about the practices of instructors and peers that lead to improving the students’ participation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Dunphy Suplee ◽  
Vicki D. Lachman ◽  
Barbara Siebert ◽  
Katherine Kaby Anselmi

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 169, 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna N. Schmeiser ◽  
Karen Thomas Yehle

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fateme Mohammadi ◽  
Khodayar Oshvandi ◽  
Hazel Kyle Med

Introduction: Maintaining dignity is one of the most important human rights. However, maintaining and promoting the dignity of nursing students as an important caregiver group has scarcely been considered. Dignity can be viewed as an abstract concept particularly in relation to the perspective of male nursing student perspective. Therefore, more investigation is required to explore the male students’ understanding of the concept of dignity. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to define and explain the concept of dignity among male nursing students in the neonatal intensive care unit. Research design: This is a qualitative content analysis study. The data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews. The data were analyzed by conventional content analysis method. Participants and research context: Twenty male nursing students in public health centers in Iran were selected by targeted sampling to achieve data saturation between February 2017 and November 2017. Findings: The findings of this study were presented in three main themes, including “extensive support,” “belief in ability,” and “participation in decision making,” and 7 sub-categories of data were extracted. Ethical considerations: The study’s protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and the ethical principles were followed throughout the study. Discussion and conclusion: According to the findings of the study, male nursing students required extensive support, and their academic and practical skills required to be respected; in addition, they should be involved in decision making, because in such an environment, the dignity of these students will be maintained and promoted. Therefore, it is suggested that a cultural, professional, and institutional background in which all components of the male nursing student’s dignity are protected and emphasized should be provided.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-75
Author(s):  
Rizqi Amilia ◽  
Devi Nurmalia

Background: As nurses play an important role in the implementation of patient safety in hospitals, competencies of patient safety should be developed and enhanced among nursing students. Self-assessment is a method that can be used to assess patient safety and its dimensions to help the students prepare themselves before entering the work life.Purpose: This study aimed to investigate differences in patient safety competencies between classroom and clinical settings among nursing students using a self-assessment method.Methods: A descriptive study using the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) questionnaire was conducted among 181 nursing students in a public university in Indonesia. Paired t-test, ANOVA, and independent t-test were performed to determine the comparison in the values of patient safety dimensions across classroom, clinical learning, and year of nursing course.Results: Nursing students showed a higher mean value in the classroom setting than the clinical setting. Out of the seven dimensions of patient safety competencies, “clinical safety” (M=4.36) and “communicate effectively” (M=4.29) obtained the highest score in classroom setting, while “adverse events” showed the lowest (M=4.03). In the clinical setting, “clinical safety” (M=4.19) and “communicate effectively” (M=4.12) obtained the highest score, while “working in teams” (M=3.82) was the lowest. The third-year students showed a better score than the fourth year in most dimensions.Conclusion: In this study, the patient safety competencies among nursing students were higher in the classroom setting than in the clinical setting. It is recommended to investigate the factors that can increase the achievement of patient safety competence among nursing student in the clinical setting.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leeanne Pront ◽  
Moira Kelton ◽  
Rebecca Munt ◽  
Alison Hutton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document