Analysis of Licensure Testing Patterns of RN Graduates in Oregon

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Noone ◽  
Joy Ingwerson ◽  
Amari Kunz
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 528
Author(s):  
Jamieson M Bourque ◽  
Alexander Schepart ◽  
Rahul Bhambri ◽  
Adam Castaño ◽  
Alex O’Brien ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 287-287
Author(s):  
Ari M. Vanderwalde ◽  
Esprit Ma ◽  
Elaine Yu ◽  
Tania Szado ◽  
Richard Price ◽  
...  

287 Background: Recent approvals of targeted treatments (tx) have improved personalized care in aNSCLC. Biomarker testing is crucial for patients (pts) to receive optimal tx expeditiously. This study examined aNSCLC biomarker testing and tx patterns at OneOnc. Methods: Pts diagnosed with aNSCLC (stage ≥ IIIb) from 1/1/2015 to 5/31/2020, aged ≥ 18 years, and with ≥ 1 visit ≤ 90 days of advanced (Adv) diagnosis (Dx) were retrospectively evaluated using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record derived de-identified database from selected OneOnc sites. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate testing patterns for ALK, BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, PD-L1, and ROS-1 biomarkers and actionable mutation tx pattern. Results: Overall 3,860 aNSCLC pts were included, median age was 69 years, 47% females, 66% non-squamous, 29% squamous, 4% histology NOS, and 23% with ECOG performance status 0-1. Of the 3,152 (82%) pts tested for any biomarker, 64% received next-generation sequencing (NGS) vs. 36% received other biomarker tests only. Testing rates varied by biomarker: EGFR (74%), ALK (72%), ROS-1 (66%), PD-L1 (57%), BRAF (56%), KRAS (54%). Pts who received all 6 biomarker tests increased from 12% (2015), 23% (2016), 40% (2017), 41% (2018), 48% (2019) to 56% (2020). Among the tested pts, the median time from Adv Dx to the first test result was 20 days (d) and from specimen collection after Adv Dx to the first test result was 12 d. Pts tested and treated before test result available declined from 28% (2015) to 16% (2020). Of 1,207 pts with actionable mutations, 390 (32%) received tx before the test result: 35% chemotherapy (chemo) only, 28% chemo + cancer immunotherapy (CIT), and 15% CIT only. After the test result, 26% to 81% of pts received no or other tx not specific to actionable mutations [Table]. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrated an increase in aNSCLC biomarker testing at OneOnc over time, while 44% pts in 2020 did not receive testing on all 6 biomarkers. Some pts had tx prior to the test result, but this trend appeared to decline. Further studies are warranted to better understand the reasons for pts receiving tx that were not specific to their actionable mutations.[Table: see text]


AIDS Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Rosińska ◽  
Ruth Simmons ◽  
Anna Marzec-Bogusławska ◽  
Janusz Janiec ◽  
Kholoud Porter

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. S60-S61
Author(s):  
H.A. Wakelee ◽  
M. Sasane ◽  
J. Zhang ◽  
A.R. Macalalad ◽  
P. Galebach ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10591-10591
Author(s):  
Solange Bayard ◽  
Yalei Chen ◽  
Genevieve A. Fasano ◽  
Melissa Davis ◽  
Eleanor M. Walker ◽  
...  

10591 Background: TNBC is disproportionately prevalent in African American (AA) populations and in women with BRCA-1 germline mutations. BRCA mutation carriers are candidates for targeted therapy with PARP-inhibitors, and testing results may influence risk-reducing surgery choice. Methods: We evaluated genetic testing patterns and outcomes for TNBC patients treated in the prospectively maintained databases of academic cancer programs in two metropolitan cities in the Northeast (New York City, NYC) and Midwest (Detroit, Det), 1998-2018. Median follow up was 3.73 years. Testing patterns were also analyzed by time, comparing pts diagnosed before versus after the mid-2013 Supreme Court ruling that expanded testing availability by banning gene patenting. Results: Of 810 pts, 600 were from NYC and 200 from Det; 202 were AA and 488 WA. Pts undergoing genetic testing were younger (median age 50 vs 62; p < 0.0001). Compared to WA, AA pts were less likely to undergo genetic testing overall (23.8% vs 42.0%; p < 0.0001) and within site (NYC: 25.6% vs 42.8%, p = 0.008; Det: 22.3% vs 38.6%, p = 0.025). No significant differences were seen in frequency of pathogenic BRCA mutations (AA-14.6%; WA-29.3%) or VUSs (AA-6.3%; WA- 4.9%); p = 0.20. Genetic testing disparities were reduced among pts diagnosed after mid-2013 (AA-31.4% vs WA-44.0%; p = 0.01) compared to pre-mid-2013 (AA-18.3% vs WA-40.7%; p < 0.0001). No differences were seen in local or distant recurrence free survival between patients with BRCA, BRCA variants of uncertain significance, non-BRCA mutations, and patients without genetic mutations (local recurrence p = 0.827; distant recurrence p = 0.574). This outcome equivalence was consistent when stratified by WA vs AA identity. Conclusions: Genetic testing has increased for TNBC pts following the mid-2013 Supreme Court ban on gene patenting, but race-associated disparities persist. Pts undergoing genetic testing are more likely to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy, but testing results do not affect survival outcomes, regardless of race. Addressing genetic testing disparities will become increasingly important as mutation-associated targeted therapies are identified through advances in precision medicine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1036-1036
Author(s):  
Cheryl D. Cho-Phan ◽  
Jeremy Snider ◽  
Liangliang Zhang ◽  
Kimberly McGregor ◽  
Alexa Betzig Schrock ◽  
...  

1036 Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification measured by IHC or ISH is a predictive biomarker for HER2-targeted therapies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can identify ERBB2 amplification (amp) and mutations. We examined clinical characteristics, NGS testing patterns, and outcomes of pts treated with 1L HER2 therapy with HER2+ mBC based on ERBB2 amp status using a real-world (RW) clinico-genomic database (CGDB). Methods: Pts with mBC (HER2+ by IHC and/or ISH) treated with 1L HER2 therapy who had undergone NGS and were treated within the Flatiron Health (FH) network were eligible. Clinical characteristics and HER2 testing results were obtained via technology-enabled abstraction of clinician notes and radiology/pathology reports and linked to genomic data from Foundation Medicine (FMI) in the nationwide (US-based), de-identified FH-FMI CGDB. Demographic, clinical and genomic characteristics were summarized and stratified by concordance between HER2+ (IHC 3+ or ISH amp+) and ERBB2amp+ status [copy number (CN) ≥ 5]. NGS testing patterns and 1L HER2 therapy were characterized and stratified by concordance status. Concordance was assessed based on contemporaneous timing of paired test specimen collection dates (FMI NGS ≤ 30 days of HER2+ status). RW overall survival (rwOS) stratified by HER2+/ ERBB2 amp concordance was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 268 eligible pts, HER2+/ ERBB2amp+ concordance was 66% (176/268); concordance among contemporaneous paired specimens was 73% (106/145). Demographic and clinical features were overall well-balanced with most pts treated at community sites [94%, (252/268)]; the discordant (HER2+/ ERBB2amp-) group (95/268) had more pts with hormone receptor positive disease (73% vs 62%). Concordance by assay type varied; IHC+ only, IHC+/ISH+, and ISH+ only agreement was 72% (95/132), 76% (26/34) and 52% (50/96), respectively. A higher proportion of discordance (35% vs 19%) was seen in pts treated at community vs. academic sites. Median rwOS was 32.9 months (IQR 25.9-38.9) among concordant (HER2+/ ERBB2amp+) and 15.5 months (IQR 8.9-30.1) among discordant (HER2+/ ERBB2amp-) pts, aHR = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.48-1.03; p = 0.073]. Conclusions: Among RW pts with HER2+ mBC receiving 1L HER2 therapy, discordance between ERBB2amp and IHC/ISH HER2 testing methods was observed. Pts with tumors HER2+ by IHC and/or ISH but negative for ERBB2amp had a trend towards worse rwOS following receipt of HER2 therapy compared to concordant cases. Contemporaneous timing of specimen collection was associated with greater concordance. Future analyses on the additive value of ERBB2 CN as a predictive marker, and assessing factors that may affect discordance such as intratumor HER2 heterogeneity, tumor content, and biopsy site are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document