scholarly journals Adverse Events During Perampanel Adjunctive Therapy in Intractable Epilepsy

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Ee Youn ◽  
Se Hee Kim ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
Sun Ho Lee ◽  
Young Mock Lee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119099
Author(s):  
Gabriele Camattari ◽  
Bernhard Steinhoff ◽  
Elinor Ben-Menachem ◽  
Christian Brandt ◽  
Irene García Morales ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1751-1761
Author(s):  
Daryl DeKarske ◽  
Gustavo Alva ◽  
Jason L. Aldred ◽  
Bruce Coate ◽  
Marc Cantillon ◽  
...  

Background: Many patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience depression. Objective: Evaluate pimavanserin treatment for depression in patients with PD. Methods: Pimavanserin was administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in this 8-week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT03482882). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Depression Scale–17-item version (HAMD-17) score. Safety, including collection of adverse events and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores, was assessed in patients who received ≥1 pimavanserin dose. Results: Efficacy was evaluated in 45 patients (21 monotherapy, 24 adjunctive therapy). Mean (SE) baseline HAMD-17 was 19.2 (3.1). Change from baseline to week 8 (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) in the HAMD-17 was –10.8 (0.63) (95% CI, –12.0 to –9.5; p < 0.0001) with significant improvement seen at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and for both monotherapy (week 8, –11.2 [0.99]) and adjunctive therapy (week 8,–10.2 [0.78]). Most patients (60.0%) had ≥50% improvement at week 8, and 44.4% of patients reached remission (HAMD-17 score ≤7). Twenty-one of 47 patients experienced 42 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common by system organ class were gastrointestinal (n = 7; 14.9%) and psychiatric (n = 7; 14.9%). No negative effects were observed on MMSE or MDS-UPDRS Part III. Conclusion: In this 8-week, single-arm, open-label study, pimavanserin as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was well tolerated and associated with early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with PD.


2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210455
Author(s):  
Eric Toussirot ◽  
Martin Michaud ◽  
Daniel Wendling ◽  
Valérie Devauchelle

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay of treatment for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).1 Despite their efficacy, GCs are associated with well-known adverse events and a substantial proportion of patients with PMR do not respond adequately, or are refractory, to initial GC treatment. GC-sparing agents in PMR are limited to methotrexate (MTX).1


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Mader ◽  
Bruce J. Fisch ◽  
Nicole R. Villemarette-Pittman ◽  
Piotr W. Olejniczak ◽  
Michael E. Carey

Intractable epilepsy with painful partial motor seizures is a relatively rare and difficult disorder to treat. We evaluated the usefulness of botulinum toxin to reduce ictal pain. Two patients received two or four botulinum toxin (BTX) injections at one-to-two-month intervals. Patient 1 had painful seizures of the right arm and hand. Patient 2 had painful seizures involving the left foot and leg. Injections were discontinued after improved seizure control following resective surgery. Both patients received significant pain relief from the injections with analgesia lasting at least two months. Seizure severity was reduced, but seizure frequency and duration were unaffected. For these patients, BTX was effective in temporarily relieving pain associated with muscle contraction in simple partial motor seizures. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that modulation of motor end-organ feedback affects focal seizure generation. BTX is a safe and reversible treatment that should be considered as part of adjunctive therapy after failure to achieve control of painful partial motor seizures.


2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoureh Togha ◽  
Shahin Akhondzadeh ◽  
Mahmood Motamedi ◽  
Babak Ahmadi ◽  
Soodeh Razeghi

Author(s):  
Michał Sobstyl ◽  
Angelika Stapińska-Syniec ◽  
Szczepan Iwański ◽  
Marcin Rylski

Abstract Introduction Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT DBS) is a neuromodulation therapy for patients with refractory partial seizures. The ANT is the structure of a limbic system with abundant neuronal connections to temporal and frontal brain regions that participate in seizure propagation circuitry. State of the Art We have performed a literature search regarding the clinical efficacy of ANT DBS. We discuss the surgical technique of the implantation of DBS electrodes with special attention paid to the targeting methods of the ANT. Moreover, we present in detail the clinical efficacy of ANT DBS, with a special emphasis on the stimulation parameters, a stimulation mode, and polarity. We also report all adverse events and present the current limitations of ANT DBS. Clinical Implications In general, the safety profile of DBS in intractable epilepsy patients is good, with a low rate of surgery, hardware-related, and stimulation-induced adverse events. No significant cognitive declines or worsening of depressive symptoms was noted. At long-term follow-up, the quality-of-life scores have improved. The limitations of ANT DBS studies include a limited number of patients treated and mostly open-label designs with only one double-blind, randomized multicenter trial. Most studies do not report the etiology of intractable epilepsy or they include nonhomogeneous groups of patients affected by intractable epilepsy. There are no guidelines for setting initial stimulation parameters. All the variables mentioned may have a profound impact on the final outcome. Conclusions ANT DBS appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment, particularly in patients with refractory partial seizures (three-quarters of patients gained at least 50% seizure reduction after 5 years). ANT DBS reduces most effectively the seizures originating in the temporal and frontal lobes. The published results of ANT DBS highlight promise and hope for patients with intractable epilepsy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. A7.1-A7
Author(s):  
McMurray Rob ◽  
Delanty Norman ◽  
Villanueva Vicente

PurposeTo assess eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as monotherapy in everyday clinical practice.MethodEuro-Esli was a pooled analysis of 14 European studies. In a subanalysis, data were compared for patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy, and for patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy.Assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction), seizure freedom rate (seizure freedom at least since prior visit) and incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsESL was used as monotherapy in 88/2045 and 229/1340 patients initially and at last visit, respectively. At 12 months, responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy (responder: 94.1% versus 74.8%; seizure freedom: 88.2% versus 39.0%), and in patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy (responder: 93.2% versus 70.4%; seizure freedom: 77.4% versus 25.9%). Overall incidence of AEs was similar in patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy and adjunctive therapy (29.4% versus 34.4%), and in patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy and adjunctive therapy (27.1% versus 30.8%).ConclusionESL was significantly more effective when used as monotherapy compared with adjunctive therapy; safety/tolerability was generally comparable.Supported by Eisai


Epilepsia ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Biton ◽  
John R. Gates ◽  
Frank J. Ritter ◽  
Ruth B. Loewenson

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadegh Yoosefee ◽  
Man Amanat ◽  
Mona Salehi ◽  
Seyed Vahid Mousavi ◽  
Jamshid Behzadmanesh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder that causes impairment in daily activities. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as adjunctive therapy with fluoxetine in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe OCD. Methods This is a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Individuals with OCD who had baseline Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) of > 15 were enrolled. Eligible cases were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either 20-min-period of stimulation with tDCS and fluoxetine (experimental arm) or fluoxetine only (sham control arm). The anodal electrode of tDCS was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Fp3) and the cathodal electrode was placed over the right orbitofrontal cortex (F8). Two mA electrical stimulation with the tDCS was used for 20 min in individuals of experimental group. In the control group, electrodes were placed and stimulation was administered for 30 s to induce the same skin sensation as in experimental group. This procedure was performed three times per week for 8 weeks. Y-BOCS test was assessed at baseline, week 4 (after 12th stimulation), week 8 (after 24th stimulation), and 1 month after the last stimulation. The primary endpoints were the mean changes in Y-BOCS total score from baseline to the last visit. The secondary endpoints were the mean changes in obsession and compulsion sub-scores from baseline to the last visit. Adverse events were also assessed. Mixed design repeated measures analysis of variance assessed the endpoints. Results Sixty individuals (30 in each group) were participated. All individuals in control group and 28 cases in experimental arm completed the trial. The mean Y-BOCS (F(1.85) = 30.83; P < 0.001), OCD obsession (F(2.23) = 25.01; P < 0.001), and compulsion (F(2.06) = 10.81; P < 0.001) scores decreased significantly during the study. No statistical differences were, however, detected between experimental and control groups (P > 0.05). The tDCS was well tolerated and no major adverse events were reported. Conclusion This study showed that among individuals with moderate to severe OCD, there was no significant difference regarding OC symptoms between cases used tDCS as adjunctive therapy with fluoxetine and individuals used fluoxetine only. Trial registration IRCT2017030632904N1. Registered 14 July 2017, http://irct.ir/user/trial/44193/view


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document