Abatacept as Adjunctive Therapy in Refractory Polymyalgia Rheumatica

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210455
Author(s):  
Eric Toussirot ◽  
Martin Michaud ◽  
Daniel Wendling ◽  
Valérie Devauchelle

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay of treatment for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).1 Despite their efficacy, GCs are associated with well-known adverse events and a substantial proportion of patients with PMR do not respond adequately, or are refractory, to initial GC treatment. GC-sparing agents in PMR are limited to methotrexate (MTX).1

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119099
Author(s):  
Gabriele Camattari ◽  
Bernhard Steinhoff ◽  
Elinor Ben-Menachem ◽  
Christian Brandt ◽  
Irene García Morales ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1751-1761
Author(s):  
Daryl DeKarske ◽  
Gustavo Alva ◽  
Jason L. Aldred ◽  
Bruce Coate ◽  
Marc Cantillon ◽  
...  

Background: Many patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience depression. Objective: Evaluate pimavanserin treatment for depression in patients with PD. Methods: Pimavanserin was administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in this 8-week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT03482882). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Depression Scale–17-item version (HAMD-17) score. Safety, including collection of adverse events and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores, was assessed in patients who received ≥1 pimavanserin dose. Results: Efficacy was evaluated in 45 patients (21 monotherapy, 24 adjunctive therapy). Mean (SE) baseline HAMD-17 was 19.2 (3.1). Change from baseline to week 8 (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) in the HAMD-17 was –10.8 (0.63) (95% CI, –12.0 to –9.5; p < 0.0001) with significant improvement seen at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and for both monotherapy (week 8, –11.2 [0.99]) and adjunctive therapy (week 8,–10.2 [0.78]). Most patients (60.0%) had ≥50% improvement at week 8, and 44.4% of patients reached remission (HAMD-17 score ≤7). Twenty-one of 47 patients experienced 42 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common by system organ class were gastrointestinal (n = 7; 14.9%) and psychiatric (n = 7; 14.9%). No negative effects were observed on MMSE or MDS-UPDRS Part III. Conclusion: In this 8-week, single-arm, open-label study, pimavanserin as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was well tolerated and associated with early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with PD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Ee Youn ◽  
Se Hee Kim ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
Sun Ho Lee ◽  
Young Mock Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izzat Shbeeb ◽  
Divya Challah ◽  
Shafay Raheel ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson ◽  
Eric L. Matteson

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 168.1-169
Author(s):  
K. Benesova ◽  
L. Diekmann ◽  
H. M. Lorenz ◽  
K. Jordan ◽  
J. Leipe

Background:Reports of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have recently attracted new attention to the complex interrelations of malignancies andrheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Since those two entities represent two sides of a dysregulated immune response, further research on rheumatic irAEs and mechanisms underlying the better tumor response rates in irAE-affected patients may contribute to a better understanding of the different pathophysiology characterizing tumor and rheumatic disease.Objectives:Given the heterogeneity of the patient population with rheumatic irAEs, a registry-based study has been conducted to provide first evidence regarding characteristics of rheumatic irAEs and further insights into the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of rheumatic irAEs.Methods:The TRheuMa registry is a long-term, open-end observational study of a patient cohort suffering from rheumatic symptoms as a result of ICPi or other cancer therapies. The TRheuMa registry is one of the three subregistries of the MalheuR project, a registry-based study initiated in July 2018 at the at the university hospital Heidelberg to explore interrelations of malignancies and RMDs.Results:Over 18 months, 52 of 63 patients in the TRheuMa registry were recruited with a rheumatic irAE under ICPi treatment (pembrolizumab n=21, nivolumab n=28, ipilimumab n=11, durvalumab n=1, atezolizumab n=2, avelumab n=1, history of >1 ICPi n=11). Of the 52 patients, 22 (42.3%) had non-small cell lung cancer and 23 (44.2%) had a melanoma. Eight (15.3%) patients experienced a flare of a preexisting RMD under ICPi treatment. The remaining 44 patients withde novoirAEs were characterized by rheumatoid arthritis-like (20.5%) or polymyalgia rheumatica-like (18.1%) and psoriatic or other spondyloarthritis-like phenotypes (50.0%). However, laboratory findings differed from classical RMDs with elevated CRP-levels in 73.1% particularly in psoriatic arthritis-like, but not necessarily in polymyalgia rheumatica-like irAEs. On the contrary, autoantibody positivity was very rare. The majority of patients (78.8%) showed signs of inflammation upon ultrasound examination.Based on the severity of signs and symptoms as well as treatment response, we developed a therapeutic algorithm for rheumatic irAEs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or low dosed glucocorticoids (≤10mg prednisone equivalent) as first treatment step were sufficient for 75% patients, whereas 17.3% required higher dosed glucocorticoids and 11.5% patients required further treatment with a cs- or bDMARD. In two cases ICPi-treatment was discontinued on patients’ request due to the pain and functional impairment caused by the rheumatic irAE, although a satisfactory symptom control was reached in the further course.Complete remission of cancer was observed in 43.5% of melanoma patients, 66.7% experienced additional severe irAEs in other organ systems.Conclusion:Overall, data from the TRheuMa-registry show that rheumatic irAEs mostly resemble classical RMDs, however show distinct characteristics. Our diagnostic and therapeutic management of rheumatic irAEs demonstrated efficacy in the majority of patients. These findings contribute to the further understanding of rheumatic irAEs and malignancies. Future research agenda includes a correlation of irAE severity with tumor response.Disclosure of Interests:Karolina Benesova Grant/research support from: Study grants for SCREENED study by Abbvie, Novartis and Rheumaliga Baden-Württemberg, Consultant of: One-time participation in Novartis advisory board., Leonore Diekmann: None declared, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Grant/research support from: Consultancy and/or speaker fees and/or travel reimbursements: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly. Scientific support and/or educational seminars and/or clinical studies: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, Thermo Fisher., Consultant of: see above, Karin Jordan Consultant of: Consultancy and/or speaker fees: MSD, Merck, Amgen, Hexal, Riemser, Helsinn, Tesaro, Kreussler, Voluntis, Pfizer, Pomme-med., Jan Leipe Grant/research support from: Consultancy and speaker fees: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Hospira, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB. Scientific support: Novartis, Pfizer., Consultant of: Consultancy and speaker fees: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Hospira, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB. Scientific support: Novartis, Pfizer., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Hospira, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 834.2-835
Author(s):  
S. Banerjee ◽  
K. Chaudhuri ◽  
A. Desai ◽  
M. Krishna ◽  
N. Gullick

Background:Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the commonest chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease of the elderly. The mainstay of treatment for PMR is long term systemic glucocorticoid (GC), which is associated with significant systemic toxicity. There is a need for steroid sparing drugs in PMR to reduce GC cumulative dose and GC induced adverse effects.(1)Objectives:To evaluate the role of steroid sparing agents in PMR.Primary outcomes:1.Steroid sparing effect of the intervention, measured by difference in cumulative glucocorticoid dose2.Percentage of patients in remission.Secondary outcomes:1. Mean reduction of CRP/ESR2. Adverse event/toxicity the drugs being compared—measured as number of patients with adverse events in the compared groups3. Percentage of patients with relapse during study period4. MortalityMethods:Electronic databases including Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases (CENTRAL) were searched since inception for prospective randomized control trials comparing disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics with systemic GC in PMR, published in English with more than 20 patients and a minimum study duration of 24 weeks. As different classification criteria for PMR exist, studies were included if they used any accepted classification criteria for PMR. Case series, case reports, retrospective, non-randomized trials, abstracts, systematic reviews and non English language trials were not included. Patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) were excluded. Risk of bias and quality was assessed using the Cochrane tool.The studies were assessed for cumulative GC dose, proportion of patients in remission, proportion of patients with relapse, reduction in inflammatory markers, adverse events and mortality.Results:5 studies were selected for final review-- 3 studies involving Methotrexate, one study on azathioprine, one on Infliximab. The study on Azathioprine had high risk of bias, small sample size and low quality (Level 2 evidence) with high attrition rate but it revealed reduction of daily prednisolone with Azathioprine. A high quality RCT (Level 1) did not confirm a steroid sparing effect with Infliximab vs placebo, and there was no significant difference between relapse or remission rate. Methotrexate studies showed conflicting results: one high quality RCT (Level 1) and one low quality RCT (Level 2) on Methotrexate revealed statistically significant steroid sparing effect, however the remaining study did not demonstrate between Methotrexate and placebo. Two methotrexate studies assessed the risk of relapse, with conflicting results (relapses 73% placebo vs 47% methotrexate; or no difference).Methotrexate was not associated with increased adverse effects in any of the studies. Azathioprine was associated with significant adverse events resulting in high attrition.A meta analysis was not performed for methotrexate as the studies were heterogenous.Conclusion:There is a lack of evidence regarding DMARDs and biologics in PMR. Methotrexate is an effective steroid sparing agent, and is not associated with increased adverse events. Azathioprine may be effective but is associated with significant adverse events. Infliximab is not an effective steroid sparing agent in PMR. More high quality RCTs are needed to study the efficacy of steroid sparing agents.References:[1]Bhaskar Dasgupta, Frances A. Borg, Nada Hassan, Kevin Barraclough, Brian Bourke, Joan Fulcher, Jane Hollywood, Andrew Hutchings, Valerie Kyle, Jennifer Nott, Michael Power, Ash Samanta, on behalf of the BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group, BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica,Rheumatology, Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 186–190Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAURIZIO MAZZANTINI ◽  
CLAUDIA TORRE ◽  
MARIO MICCOLI ◽  
ANGELO BAGGIANI ◽  
ROSARIA TALARICO ◽  
...  

Objective.To assess the occurrence of adverse events in a cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), treated with low-dose glucocorticoids (GC).Methods.This was a retrospective study by review of medical records.Results.We identified 222 patients who had a mean duration of followup of 60 ± 22 months and a mean duration of GC therapy of 46 ± 22 months. We found that 95 patients (43%) had at least 1 adverse event after a mean duration of GC therapy of 31 ± 22 months and a mean cumulative dose of 3.4 ± 2.4 g. In particular, 55 developed osteoporosis, 31 had fragility fractures; 27 developed arterial hypertension; 11 diabetes mellitus; 9 acute myocardial infarction; 3 stroke; and 2 peripheral arterial disease. Univariate analysis showed that the duration of GC treatment was significantly associated with osteoporosis (p < 0.0001), fragility fractures (p < 0.0001), arterial hypertension (p < 0.005), and acute myocardial infarction (p < 0.05). Cumulative GC dose was significantly associated with osteoporosis (p < 0.0001), fragility fractures (p < 0.0001), and arterial hypertension (p < 0.01). The adverse events occurred more frequently after 2 years of treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that GC duration was significantly associated with osteoporosis (adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02–1.05) and arterial hypertension (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06); GC cumulative dose was significantly associated with fragility fractures (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.03–1.8).Conclusion.Longterm, low-dose GC treatment of PMR is associated with serious adverse events such as osteoporosis, fractures, and arterial hypertension; these adverse events occur mostly after 2 years of treatment.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092154
Author(s):  
Nikhila Kethireddy ◽  
Steffi Thomas ◽  
Poorva Bindal ◽  
Prateek Shukla ◽  
Upendra Hegde

Introduction Immune agents including anti-programmed death receptor-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 have been associated with numerous immune-related complications. Pembrolizumab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, has been associated with a number of immune-related adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, hypophysitis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, nephritis, and type 1 diabetes. Case report We present a rare case of an elderly male on pembrolizumab who suffered from four autoimmune toxicities including type 1 diabetes, pneumonitis, hypothyroidism, and polymyalgia rheumatica likely catalyzed by age-related immune activation. Management and outcome: Immunotherapy was indefinitely stopped, and patient was started on steroids for the immune-related adverse events with complete resolution of polymyalgia rheumatica. Thyroid dysfunction resolved once he started thyroid replacement therapy. His diabetes is well controlled with insulin and is followed by endocrinology. He continues on prednisone for immune-mediated pneumonitis with a good response with regular monitoring via computed tomography scans and pulmonary consultation. Discussion Few cases wherein multiple toxicities are seen within one patient are reported. Aging appears to be a risk factor for immune-related adverse events. Aging is associated with an increased incidence of autoimmunity as programmed death-1 ligand expression represents an important mechanism that tissues use to protect from self-reactive effector T cells. Programmed death-1 blockade breaks this protective mechanism and enhances autoimmune diseases. Therefore, close monitoring and extreme vigilance is warranted while using immune checkpoint inhibitors including pembrolizumab as multiple toxicities can occur within a short span of infusion, especially in elderly individuals. Prompt discontinuation and the use of a multidisciplinary team are prudent to prevent further morbidity and mortality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. A7.1-A7
Author(s):  
McMurray Rob ◽  
Delanty Norman ◽  
Villanueva Vicente

PurposeTo assess eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as monotherapy in everyday clinical practice.MethodEuro-Esli was a pooled analysis of 14 European studies. In a subanalysis, data were compared for patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy, and for patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy.Assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction), seizure freedom rate (seizure freedom at least since prior visit) and incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsESL was used as monotherapy in 88/2045 and 229/1340 patients initially and at last visit, respectively. At 12 months, responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy (responder: 94.1% versus 74.8%; seizure freedom: 88.2% versus 39.0%), and in patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy (responder: 93.2% versus 70.4%; seizure freedom: 77.4% versus 25.9%). Overall incidence of AEs was similar in patients treated initially with ESL monotherapy and adjunctive therapy (29.4% versus 34.4%), and in patients treated at last visit with ESL monotherapy and adjunctive therapy (27.1% versus 30.8%).ConclusionESL was significantly more effective when used as monotherapy compared with adjunctive therapy; safety/tolerability was generally comparable.Supported by Eisai


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document