scholarly journals El movimiento Open Citations y sus implicaciones en la transformación de la evaluación científica

Arbor ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 197 (799) ◽  
pp. a592
Author(s):  
José Luis Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Knowledge Graph ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Microsoft Academic ◽  
Sistemas De Informacion

El presente trabajo pretende hacer una revisión del naciente movimiento Open Citations, el cual aboga por la libre disposición de las citas bibliográficas incluidas en cada contribución científica. Este movimiento, enmarcado dentro de corrientes más generales como Open Data y Open Access, busca de esta forma que las citas bibliográficas sean un bien común para la comunidad científica, reforzando el desarrollo de la investigación bibliométrica y la construcción de sistemas de información científica autóctonos. Este cambio está suponiendo una revolución en el mercado de la documentación científica, al surgir nuevos productos y plataformas que permiten valorar la producción e impacto de investigadores e instituciones a partir de fuentes abiertas y alternativas. Esta transformación implica una oportunidad para el desarrollo de portales regionales o institucionales que, alimentados de estas fuentes abiertas, permitan una evaluación propia e independiente. En primer lugar, se hará un análisis del origen y contexto de este movimiento; se analizarán las fuentes de citas abiertas que están apareciendo (Crossref, Microsoft Academic Knowledge Graph, Open Citation Corpus) y algunos productos alternativos (Lens, Dimensions, SemanticScholar); por último, se analizará las implicaciones que todo este movimiento puede tener en la evaluación científica, haciendo hincapié en la posibilidad de desarrollar Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) locales destinados a la evaluación científica.

scholarly journals LAS PLATAFORMAS DE PUBLICACIÓN: HERRAMIENTAS OPEN DATA

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viena Muirragui Irrazábal ◽  
Fernando Pacheco Olea ◽  
Edwin León Plúas ◽  
Leonidas Pacheco Olea
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Digital Media ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Information Access ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Content Management ◽  
Technological Support ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Sistemas De Informacion ◽  
Transmission Information

El documento hace referencia a las herramientas Open Data utilizadas en la publicación de los datos, que en ocasiones se las denomina “Catálogos de Datos”; generalmente, cumplen otras funciones, tales como su almacenamiento y transmisión en el contexto de una web semántica; y su aplicación en los sistemas de información en los que está siendo requerido; todo ello permite complementar a la catalogación. Este artículo aborda aspectos que logran establecer el porqué estos catálogos son pieza clave al momento de dar soporte tecnológico en distintas organizaciones, permitiendo que ellas alcancen su principal objetivo, el cual es, acceso a la información. Además, estas plataformas revisan información con base a su publicación, su gestión en los medios digitales y, el proceso que siguen en la cadena documental con miras a la recuperación de la información en el contexto digital de la web. Considerando lo importante de este elemento, es necesario desarrollar plataformas personalizadas, que se ajusten de forma íntegra, según los requisitos de cada usuario; partiendo desde el inicio o reutilizando gestores de contenidos actualmente disponibles. De igual forma, existen productos previamente “empaquetados”, listos para su uso inmediato, que representan una opción interesante a tener en cuenta. Palabras Clave: Publicación de datos, almacenamiento, transmisión, sistemas de información, acceso a la información ABSTRACT The document refers to the Open Data tools used in the publication of data, which sometimes are called "Data Catalogs" which usually perform many other functions such as storage and transmission in the context of a semantic web and its application in information systems in which it is being required, we can therefore complement cataloging. This article discusses aspects that manage to establish why these catalogs are instrumental when providing technological support in different organizations, allowing them to achieve their main goal, which is access to information. Besides, these platforms based on information review publication, management in digital media and the process followed in the document chain towards the retrieval of information in the digital context of the web. Considering the importance of this element, you need to get to develop customized platforms that comply in full accordance with the requirements of each user; starting from the beginning or reusing content management systems available today. Similarly, there are products previously "packaged" ready for immediate use, which represent an interesting option to consider. Keywords: Publication of data, storage, transmission, information systems, information access Recibido: enero de 2016Aprobado: mayo de 2016

scholarly journals The Data Set Knowledge Graph: Creating a Linked Open Data Source for Data Sets

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Michael Färber ◽  
David Lamprecht
Keyword(s):  
Open Data ◽  
Knowledge Graph ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Name Disambiguation ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Data Set ◽  
High Data ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Knowledge Graphs

Abstract Several scholarly knowledge graphs have been proposed to model and analyze the academic landscape. However, although the number of data sets has increased remarkably in recent years, these knowledge graphs do not primarily focus on data sets but rather associated entities such as publications. Moreover, publicly available data set knowledge graphs do not systematically contain links to the publications in which the data sets are mentioned. In this paper, we present an approach for constructing an RDF knowledge graph that fulfills these mentioned criteria. Our data set knowledge graph, DSKG, is publicly available at http://dskg.org and contains metadata of data sets for all scientific disciplines. To ensure high data quality of the DSKG, we first identify suitable raw data set collections for creating the DSKG. We then establish links between the data sets and publications modeled in the Microsoft Academic Knowledge Graph that mention these data sets. As the author names of data sets can be ambiguous, we develop and evaluate a method for author name disambiguation and enrich the knowledge graph with links to ORCID. Overall, our knowledge graph contains more than 2,000 data sets with associated properties, as well as 814,000 links to 635,000 scientific publications. It can be used for a variety of scenarios, facilitating advanced data set search systems and new ways of measuring and awarding the provisioning of data sets.

CONNECTING CLOSED WORLD RESEARCH INFORMATION SYSTEMS THROUGH THE LINKED OPEN DATA WEB

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 345-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRIGITTE JOERG ◽  
IVAN RUIZ-RUBE ◽  
MIGUEL-ANGEL SICILIA ◽  
JAN DVOŘÁK ◽  
KEITH JEFFERY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Graph Model ◽  
Linked Open Data ◽  
Relational Model ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Closed World ◽  
High Flexibility

Research Information Systems (RIS) play a critical role in the sharing of scientific information and provide researchers, professionals and decision makers with the required data for their activities. Existing RIS standards have proposed data models to represent the main entities for storage and exchange. These account for the needs of multiple stakeholders through a high flexibility based on a formal syntax and declared semantics, but for techno-historical reasons they assume the completeness of information within system boundaries. The distributed nature of research information across systems calls for a mechanism to link the local entities from the closed world of concrete RISs with other possibly underspecified entities exposed through other means, as for example, the Linked Open Data Web. By transformation of a relational model into an open graph model, differences between the two system paradigms are revealed. The main principles and techniques for exposing CERIF-driven relational data as linked data will be provided as a first step demonstrating effective RISs interconnection through the linked open data (LOD) Web.

scholarly journals Development of Knowledge Graph for Data Management Related to Flooding Disasters Using Open Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Jiseong Son ◽  
Chul-Su Lim ◽  
Hyoung-Seop Shim ◽  
Ji-Sun Kang
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Domain Knowledge ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Heterogeneous Data ◽  
Big Data Analysis ◽  
Knowledge Graph ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Disaster Data ◽  
Knowledge Graphs ◽  
Open Datasets

Despite the development of various technologies and systems using artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems related to disasters, difficult challenges are still being encountered. Data are the foundation to solving diverse disaster problems using AI, big data analysis, and so on. Therefore, we must focus on these various data. Disaster data depend on the domain by disaster type and include heterogeneous data and lack interoperability. In particular, in the case of open data related to disasters, there are several issues, where the source and format of data are different because various data are collected by different organizations. Moreover, the vocabularies used for each domain are inconsistent. This study proposes a knowledge graph to resolve the heterogeneity among various disaster data and provide interoperability among domains. Among disaster domains, we describe the knowledge graph for flooding disasters using Korean open datasets and cross-domain knowledge graphs. Furthermore, the proposed knowledge graph is used to assist, solve, and manage disaster problems.

An Iterative Data Cleansing and Migration Framework for Research Information Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baumgart Matthias ◽  
Romer Lisa ◽  
Luhr Matthias ◽  
Roschke Christian ◽  
Ritter Marc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Data Cleansing ◽  
And Migration

El archivo invertido

Tábula ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 25-53
Author(s):  
James Lowry
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Open Government ◽  
Fake News ◽  
State Information ◽  
Open Government Data ◽  
Alternative Facts ◽  
Government Data ◽  
Sistemas De Informacion

Este artículo sostiene que el concepto de “umbral archivístico” del ius archivi en el que la recepción de documentos por un archivo sirve para autenticar esos documentos, se invierte en la era de los datos gubernamentales abiertos y de las tecnologías cívicas. Estas tecnologías crean una expectativa de transparencia que invierte la función del umbral. Sólo a través de la transmisión de datos desde los archivos al espacio público se puede determinar la autenticidad. En una época de “noticias falsas” y de los llamados “hechos alternativos”, esta dinámica es problemática y plantea interrogantes sobre la participación en los sistemas de información estatales. This paper argues that the ius archivi concept of the “archival threshold”, in which receipt of records by an authoritative archive serves to authenticate those records, is inverted in the era of open government data and civic technologies. These technologies of witnessing create an expectation of transparency that reverses the function of the threshold; it is only through the transmission of data out of archives and into public space that authenticity can be judged. In a time of ‘fake news’ and so called ‘alternative facts’, this dynamic is problematic and raises questions about participation in state information systems.

scholarly journals Critérios para avaliação de ferramentas para repositório conforme a Ciência Aberta

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélica Conceição Dias Miranda ◽  
Milton Shintaku ◽  
Simone Machado Firme
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Scientific Production ◽  
Open File ◽  
Research Institutes ◽  
Criteria For Evaluation ◽  
Science Movement ◽  
Bibliographic Study

Resumo: Os repositórios têm se tornado comum nas universidades e institutos de pesquisa, como forma de ofertar acesso à produção científica e, com isso, dar visibilidade à instituição. Entretanto, em muitos casos ainda estão restritos aos conceitos do movimento do arquivo aberto e acesso aberto, sendo que já se discute o Movimento da Ciência Aberta, revelando certo descompasso, requerendo estudos que apoiem a atualização dessa importante ferramenta. Nesse sentido, o presente estudo verifica os requisitos envolvidos nos movimentos abertos, de forma a apoiar a discussão técnica e tecnológica. Um estudo bibliográfico, que transforma as informações sobre os movimentos em critérios para avaliação de ferramentas para criação de repositórios, apresentando a implementação da interação como um novo desafio. Nas considerações procura-se contribuir com a discussão sobre a Ciência Aberta, de forma mais aplicada bem como o ajuste dos repositórios a esse movimento.Palavras-chave: Repositórios.  Critérios de avaliação. Arquivo aberto. Acesso aberto. Dados abertos. Ciência aberta.SURVEY OF CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF REPOSITORY TOOLS ACCORDING TO OPEN SCIENCE Abstract: Repositories have become common in universities and research institutes, as a way of offering access to scientific production, thereby giving visibility to the institution. Meanwhile, in many cases, repositories are restricted to the concepts of open movement and open access considering that the Open Science Movement is already being discussed. Regarding this matter, this study verifies the requirements involved in the open movements, in order to support a technical and technological discussion.  A bibliographic study that transforms information about movements into criteria to evaluate tools used to create repositories, presenting an implementation of interaction as a new challenge. In the considerations, we contribute with a discussion about an Open Science, in a more applied way, as well as the adjustment of the repositories to this movement.Keywords: Repositories. Evaluation Criteria. Open File. Open Access. Open Data. Open Science.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document