Prediction of Reservoir Properties for North Sea Chalk by Inverse Rock Physics Modelling

Author(s):  
A.H. Drottning ◽  
T.A. Johansen ◽  
E.H. Jensen
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 637-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Moore ◽  
James Archer ◽  
David Peavot

AbstractThe Alba Field is a relatively heavy oil accumulation lying in an Eocene deep-water channel complex in Block 16/26a of the Central North Sea. With an estimated 880 MMbbl in place, the reservoir is characterized by thick, high net/gross sands with excellent reservoir properties and rock physics favourable for seismic property detection. The field has been developed by horizontal production wells, with pressure support provided by seawater injectors. After 24 years of production, more than 427 MMbbl have been recovered.Over the course of the development, the results of development drilling and improved reservoir imaging from seismic have revealed greater reservoir complexity than anticipated at sanction. The highly irregular reservoir geometry is likely to reflect the internal stacking patterns of channel elements within the channel complex that are locally overprinted by post-depositional remobilization. This increased reservoir complexity has required more wells to effectively drain the expected volumes. Despite this, recovery has exceeded estimates from the initial field development plan, reflecting an extremely efficient waterflood. 4D seismic spectacularly images extensive sweep away from injectors and excellent reservoir connectivity. Throughout the development, the application of seismic technologies has been a key enabler for effective reservoir management and, looking forward, maximizing value.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Al Naqbi ◽  
J Ahmed ◽  
J Vargas Rios ◽  
Y Utami ◽  
A Elila ◽  
...  

Abstract The Thamama group of reservoirs consist of porous carbonates laminated with tight carbonates, with pronounced lateral heterogeneities in porosity, permeability, and reservoir thickness. The main objective of our study was mapping variations and reservoir quality prediction away from well control. As the reservoirs were thin and beyond seismic resolution, it was vital that the facies and porosity be mapped in high resolution, with a high predictability, for successful placement of horizontal wells for future development of the field. We established a unified workflow of geostatistical inversion and rock physics to characterize the reservoirs. Geostatistical inversion was run in static models that were converted from depth to time domain. A robust two-way velocity model was built to map the depth grid and its zones on the time seismic data. This ensured correct placement of the predicted high-resolution elastic attributes in the depth static model. Rock physics modeling and Bayesian classification were used to convert the elastic properties into porosity and lithology (static rock-type (SRT)), which were validated in blind wells and used to rank the multiple realizations. In the geostatistical pre-stack inversion, the elastic property prediction was constrained by the seismic data and controlled by variograms, probability distributions and a guide model. The deterministic inversion was used as a guide or prior model and served as a laterally varying mean. Initially, unconstrained inversion was tested by keeping all wells as blind and the predictions were optimized by updating the input parameters. The stochastic inversion results were also frequency filtered in several frequency bands, to understand the impact of seismic data and variograms on the prediction. Finally, 30 wells were used as input, to generate 80 realizations of P-impedance, S-impedance, Vp/Vs, and density. After converting back to depth, 30 additional blind wells were used to validate the predicted porosity, with a high correlation of more than 0.8. The realizations were ranked based on the porosity predictability in blind wells combined with the pore volume histograms. Realizations with high predictability and close to the P10, P50 and P90 cases (of pore volume) were selected for further use. Based on the rock physics analysis, the predicted lithology classes were associated with the geological rock-types (SRT) for incorporation in the static model. The study presents an innovative approach to successfully integrate geostatistical inversion and rock physics with static modeling. This workflow will generate seismically constrained high-resolution reservoir properties for thin reservoirs, such as porosity and lithology, which are seamlessly mapped in the depth domain for optimized development of the field. It will also account for the uncertainties in the reservoir model through the generation of multiple equiprobable realizations or scenarios.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 691-698
Author(s):  
M. J. Sarginson

AbstractThe Clipper Gas Field is a moderate-sized faulted anticlinal trap located in Blocks 48/19a, 48/19c and 48/20a within the Sole Pit area of the southern North Sea Gas Basin. The reservoir is formed by the Lower Permian Leman Sandstone Formation, lying between truncated Westphalian Coal Measures and the Upper Permian evaporitic Zechstein Group which form source and seal respectively. Reservoir permeability is very low, mainly as a result of compaction and diagenesis which accompanied deep burial of the Sole Pit Trough, a sub basin within the main gas basin. The Leman Sandstone Formation is on average about 715 ft thick, laterally heterogeneous and zoned vertically with the best reservoir properties located in the middle of the formation. Porosity is fair with a field average of 11.1%. Matrix permeability, however, is less than one millidarcy on average. Well productivity depends on intersecting open natural fractures or permeable streaks within aeolian dune slipface sandstones. Field development started in 1988. 24 development wells have been drilled to date. Expected recoverable reserves are 753 BCF.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-73
Author(s):  
Bastien Dupuy ◽  
Anouar Romdhane ◽  
Pierre-Louis Nordmann ◽  
Peder Eliasson ◽  
Joonsang Park

Risk assessment of CO2 storage requires the use of geophysical monitoring techniques to quantify changes in selected reservoir properties such as CO2 saturation, pore pressure and porosity. Conformance monitoring and associated decision-making rest upon the quantified properties derived from geophysical data, with uncertainty assessment. A general framework combining seismic and controlled source electromagnetic inversions with rock physics inversion is proposed with fully Bayesian formulations for proper quantification of uncertainty. The Bayesian rock physics inversion rests upon two stages. First, a search stage consists in exploring the model space and deriving models with associated probability density function (PDF). Second, an appraisal or importance sampling stage is used as a "correction" step to ensure that the full model space is explored and that the estimated posterior PDF can be used to derive quantities like marginal probability densities. Both steps are based on the neighbourhood algorithm. The approach does not require any linearization of the rock physics model or assumption about the model parameters distribution. After describing the CO2 storage context, the available data at the Sleipner field before and after CO2 injection (baseline and monitor), and the rock physics models, we perform an extended sensitivity study. We show that prior information is crucial, especially in the monitor case. We demonstrate that joint inversion of seismic and CSEM data is also key to quantify CO2 saturations properly. We finally apply the full inversion strategy to real data from Sleipner. We obtain rock frame moduli, porosity, saturation and patchiness exponent distributions and associated uncertainties along a 1D profile before and after injection. The results are consistent with geology knowledge and reservoir simulations, i.e., that the CO2 saturations are larger under the caprock confirming the CO2 upward migration by buoyancy effect. The estimates of patchiness exponent have a larger uncertainty, suggesting semi-patchy mixing behaviour.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 332-332
Author(s):  
Yongyi Li ◽  
Lev Vernik ◽  
Mark Chapman ◽  
Joel Sarout

Rock physics links the physical properties of rocks to geophysical and petrophysical observations and, in the process, serves as a focal point in many exploration and reservoir characterization studies. Today, the field of rock physics and seismic petrophysics embraces new directions with diverse applications in estimating static and dynamic reservoir properties through time-variant mechanical, thermal, chemical, and geologic processes. Integration with new digital and computing technologies is gradually gaining traction. The use of rock physics in seismic imaging, prestack seismic analysis, seismic inversion, and geomechanical model building also contributes to the increase in rock-physics influence. This special section highlights current rock-physics research and practices in several key areas, namely experimental rock physics, rock-physics theory and model studies, and the use of rock physics in reservoir characterizations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Kemper ◽  
James Gunning

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document