Introduction to this special section: Rock physics

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 332-332
Author(s):  
Yongyi Li ◽  
Lev Vernik ◽  
Mark Chapman ◽  
Joel Sarout
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Special Section ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Model Studies ◽  
Experimental Rock

Rock physics links the physical properties of rocks to geophysical and petrophysical observations and, in the process, serves as a focal point in many exploration and reservoir characterization studies. Today, the field of rock physics and seismic petrophysics embraces new directions with diverse applications in estimating static and dynamic reservoir properties through time-variant mechanical, thermal, chemical, and geologic processes. Integration with new digital and computing technologies is gradually gaining traction. The use of rock physics in seismic imaging, prestack seismic analysis, seismic inversion, and geomechanical model building also contributes to the increase in rock-physics influence. This special section highlights current rock-physics research and practices in several key areas, namely experimental rock physics, rock-physics theory and model studies, and the use of rock physics in reservoir characterizations.

Applications of quantitative prestack seismic analysis to unconventional resource play characterization in the Permian/Delaware Basin

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong Hoang ◽  
Arcangelo Sena ◽  
Benjamin Lascaud
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Yield Attributes ◽  
Horizontal Drilling ◽  
Delaware Basin ◽  
Unconventional Resource

The characterization of shale plays involves an understanding of tectonic history, geologic settings, reservoir properties, and the in-situ stresses of the potential producing zones in the subsurface. The associated hydrocarbons are generally recovered by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Historically, seismic data have been used mainly for structural interpretation of the shale reservoirs. A primary benefit of surface seismic has been the ability to locate and avoid drilling into shallow carbonate karsting zones, salt structures, and basement-related major faults which adversely affect the ability to drill and complete the well effectively. More recent advances in prestack seismic data analysis yield attributes that appear to be correlated to formation lithology, rock strength, and stress fields. From these, we may infer preferential drilling locations or sweet spots. Knowledge and proper utilization of these attributes may prove valuable in the optimization of drilling and completion activities. In recent years, geophysical data have played an increasing role in supporting well planning, hydraulic fracturing, well stacking, and spacing. We have implemented an integrated workflow combining prestack seismic inversion and multiattribute analysis, microseismic data, well-log data, and geologic modeling to demonstrate key applications of quantitative seismic analysis utilized in developing ConocoPhillips' acreage in the Delaware Basin located in Texas. These applications range from reservoir characterization to well planning/execution, stacking/spacing optimization, and saltwater disposal. We show that multidisciplinary technology integration is the key for success in unconventional play exploration and development.

scholarly journals Integrated Well Data And 3D Seismic Inversion Study For Reservoir Delineation And Description

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
Qazi Sohail Imran ◽  
◽  
Numair Ahmad Siddiqui ◽  
Abdul Halim Abdul Latif ◽  
Yasir Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Well Log ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Rock Physics Modeling ◽  
Physics Modeling ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Well Log Analysis

Offshore petroleum systems are often very complex and subtle because of a variety of depositional environments. Characterizing a reservoir based on conventional seismic and well-log stratigraphic analysis in intricate settings often leads to uncertainties. Drilling risks, as well as associated subsurface uncertainties can be minimized by accurate reservoir delineation. Moreover, a forecast can also be made about production and performance of a reservoir. This study is aimed to design a workflow in reservoir characterization by integrating seismic inversion, petrophysics and rock physics tools. Firstly, to define litho facies, rock physics modeling was carried out through well log analysis separately for each facies. Next, the available subsurface information is incorporated in a Bayesian engine which outputs several simulations of elastic reservoir properties, as well as their probabilities that were used for post-inversion analysis. Vast areal coverage of seismic and sparse vertical well log data was integrated by geostatistical inversion to produce acoustic impedance realizations of high-resolution. Porosity models were built later using the 3D impedance model. Lastly, reservoir bodies were identified and cross plot analysis discriminated the lithology and fluid within the bodies successfully.

Seismic petrophysics focused case study for AVA modelling and pre-stack seismic inversion

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Jahan Zeb ◽  
Sanjeev Rajput ◽  
Jimmy Ting
Keyword(s):  
Model Building ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Well Logs ◽  
Real Field ◽  
Seismic Responses ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Amplitude Versus

Hydrocarbon reservoirs are characterised by integrating seismic, well-log and petrophysical information, which are dissimilar in spatial distribution, scale and relationship to reservoir properties. Well logs are essential for amplitude versus offset (AVO) modelling and seismic inversion. The usability of well logs can be determined during wavelet estimation, seismic-to-well ties, background model building, property distribution for inversion, deriving probability density functions and variograms, offset-to-angle conversion of seismic data, and many other processes. For the implementation of seismic inversion workflows, accurate and geologically corrected compressional-sonic, shear-sonic and density logs are necessary. Preparing the logs for quantitative interpretation becomes challenging in a real-field environment because of bad borehole conditions including washouts, uncalibrated and variability of logging tools, invasion effects, missing shear logs and change of borehole size. Conventional petrophysical analysis is usually restricted to the reservoir interval, the calculation of reservoir versus non-reservoir (including sands or shales), and log corrections for smaller intervals; in contrast, seismic petrophysics encompasses the entire geological interval, calculates the volume of multi-minerals, incorporates boundaries between non-reservoir and reservoir, and often includes the prediction of missing compressional and shear-sonic for AVO analysis. A detailed seismic petrophysics analysis was performed for amplitude versus angle (AVA) modelling and attributes analysis. To perform the AVA modelling, a series of forward models in association with rock physics modelled fluid-substituted logs were developed, and associated seismic responses for various pore fluids and rock types studied. The results reveal that synthetic seismic responses together with the AVA analysis show changes for various lithologies. AVA attributes analysis show trends in generated synthetic seismic responses for various fluid-substituted and porosity logs. Reservoir modelling and fluid substitution increases understanding of the observed seismic response. This paper describes detailed data analysis using various techniques to confirm the rock model for petrophysical evaluation, rock physics modelling, AVA analysis, pre-stack seismic inversion, and the scenario modelling applied to the study of an oil field in Australia.

A Novel Approach for a better exploitation of a 3D seismic on a development field 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasrine Medjdouba ◽  
Zahia Benaissa ◽  
Sabiha Annou
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Lower Triassic ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Seismic Attribute ◽  
Amplitude Inversion ◽  
Well Location ◽  
Attribute Analysis ◽  
Novel Approach

<p>The main hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirover the study area is the lower Triassic Argilo-Gréseux reservoir. The Triassic sand is deposited as fluvial channels and overbank sands with a thickness ranging from 10 to 20 m, lying unconformably on the Paleozoic formations. Lateral and vertical distribution of the sand bodies is challenging which makes their mapping very difficult andnearly impossible with conventional seismic analysis. </p><p>In order to better define the optimum drilling targets, the seismic attribute analysis and reservoir characterization process were performed targeting suchthin reservoir level, analysis of available two seismic vintages of PSTM cubes as well as post and pre stack inversion results were carried out.The combination of various attributes analysis (RMS amplitude, Spectral decomposition, variance, etc.) along with seismic inversion results has helped to clearly identify the channelized feature and its delineation on various horizon slices and geobodies, the results were reviewed and calibrated with reservoir properties at well location and showed remarkable correlation.</p><p>Ten development wells have been successfully drilledbased on the seismic analysis study, confirming the efficiency of seismic attribute analysis to predicted channel body geometry.</p><p>Keywords: Channel, Attributes, Amplitude, Inversion, Fluvial reservoir.</p>

Integrated VTI model building with seismic data, geologic information, and rock-physics modeling — Part 1: Theory and synthetic test

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. C177-C191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunyue Li ◽  
Biondo Biondi ◽  
Robert Clapp ◽  
Dave Nichols
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Synthetic Test ◽  
Rock Physics Modeling ◽  
Physics Modeling ◽  
Geologic Information

Seismic anisotropy plays an important role in structural imaging and lithologic interpretation. However, anisotropic model building is a challenging underdetermined inverse problem. It is well-understood that single component pressure wave seismic data recorded on the upper surface are insufficient to resolve a unique solution for velocity and anisotropy parameters. To overcome the limitations of seismic data, we have developed an integrated model building scheme based on Bayesian inference to consider seismic data, geologic information, and rock-physics knowledge simultaneously. We have performed the prestack seismic inversion using wave-equation migration velocity analysis (WEMVA) for vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) models. This image-space method enabled automatic geologic interpretation. We have integrated the geologic information as spatial model correlations, applied on each parameter individually. We integrate the rock-physics information as lithologic model correlations, bringing additional information, so that the parameters weakly constrained by seismic are updated as well as the strongly constrained parameters. The constraints provided by the additional information help the inversion converge faster, mitigate the ambiguities among the parameters, and yield VTI models that were consistent with the underlying geologic and lithologic assumptions. We have developed the theoretical framework for the proposed integrated WEMVA for VTI models and determined the added information contained in the regularization terms, especially the rock-physics constraints.

scholarly journals Petrophysical seismic inversion based on lithofacies classification to enhance reservoir properties estimation: a machine learning approach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Abbas Babasafari ◽  
Shiba Rezaei ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Salim ◽  
Sayed Hesammoddin Kazemeini ◽  
Deva Prasad Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Impedance ◽  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Well Location ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning Approach ◽  
Lithofacies Classification ◽  
Elastic Inversion ◽  
Significant Match

Abstract For estimation of petrophysical properties in industry, we are looking for a methodology which results in more accurate outcome and also can be validated by means of some quality control steps. To achieve that, an application of petrophysical seismic inversion for reservoir properties estimation is proposed. The main objective of this approach is to reduce uncertainty in reservoir characterization by incorporating well log and seismic data in an optimal manner. We use nonlinear optimization algorithms in the inversion workflow to estimate reservoir properties away from the wells. The method is applied at well location by fitting nonlinear experimental relations on the petroelastic cross-plot, e.g., porosity versus acoustic impedance for each lithofacies class separately. Once a significant match between the measured and the predicted reservoir property is attained in the inversion workflow, the petrophysical seismic inversion based on lithofacies classification is applied to the inverted elastic property, i.e., acoustic impedance or Vp/Vs ratio derived from seismic elastic inversion to predict the reservoir properties between the wells. Comparison with the neural network method demonstrated this application of petrophysical seismic inversion to be competitive and reliable.

Frequency-dependent seismic analysis: Data processing, modeling, and interpretation

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-557
Author(s):  
Yi Shen ◽  
Kui Bao ◽  
Doug Foster ◽  
Dhananjay Kumar ◽  
Kris Innanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Seismic Interpretation ◽  
Seismic Attenuation ◽  
Frequency Dependent ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Q Model ◽  
Physics Modeling

A one-day postconvention workshop held during the 2018 SEG Annual Meeting in Anaheim, California, focused on seismic attenuation model building and compensation through imaging in the morning and on frequency-dependent seismic interpretation and rock physics in the afternoon. The workshop was organized by Dhananjay Kumar (BP), Yi Shen (Shell), Kui Bao (Shell), Mark Chapman (University of Edinburgh), Doug Foster (The University of Texas at Austin), Wenyi Hu (Advanced Geophysical Tech Inc.), and Tieyuan Zhu (Pennsylvania State University). The main topics discussed were: attenuation and Q model building using seismic, vertical seismic profiling, well-log and core data, seismic attenuation compensation, rock-physics modeling, seismic modeling, and frequency-dependent seismic interpretation.

Quantifying reservoir properties of the East Texas Woodbine through rock physics and multiattribute seismic inversion

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron McWhorter ◽  
Duane Pierce ◽  
Niranjan Banik ◽  
Haibin Xu ◽  
George Bunge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Physics ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
East Texas ◽  
Reservoir Properties
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document