Multivariate Geostatistics Analysis for Predicting Reservoir Properties Based on Seismic Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bezkhodarnov ◽  
T.I. Chichinina ◽  
M.O. Korovin ◽  
V.V. Trushkin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Multivariate Geostatistics ◽  
Geostatistics Analysis

Prediction of Reservoir Properties from Seismic Data by Multivariate Geostatistics Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Bezkhodarnov ◽  
Tatiana I. Chichinina ◽  
Mikhail O. Korovin ◽  
Valeriy V. Trushkin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Quantitative Estimation ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Seismic Attributes ◽  
Information Value ◽  
Seismic Exploration ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Multivariate Geostatistics

Abstract A new technique has been developed and is being improved, which allows, on the basis of probabilistic and statistical analysis of seismic data, to predict and evaluate the most important parameters of rock properties (including the reservoir properties such as porosity and permeability), that is, oil saturation, effective thicknesses of reservoirs, their sand content, clay content of seals, and others; it is designed to predict the reservoir properties with sufficient accuracy and detail, for subsequent consideration of these estimates when evaluating hydrocarbon reserves and justifying projects for the deposits development. Quantitative reservoir-property prediction is carried out in the following stages: –Optimization of the graph ("scenario") of seismic data processing to solve not only the traditional structural problem of seismic exploration, but also the parametric one that is, the quantitative estimation of rock properties.–Computation of seismic attributes, including exclusive ones, not provided for in existing interpretation software packages.–Estimation of reservoir properties from well logs as the base data.–Multivariate correlation and regression analysis (MCRA) includes the following two stages: Establishing correlations of seismic attributes with estimates of rock properties obtained from well logs.Construction of multidimensional (multiple) regression equations with an assessment of the "information value" of seismic attributes and the reliability of the resulting predictive equations. (By the "informative value" we mean the informativeness quality of the attribute.)–Computation and construction of the forecast map variants, their analysis and producing the resultant map (as the most optimal map version) for each predicted parameter.–Obtaining the resultant forecast maps with their zoning according to the degree of the forecast reliability. The MCRA technique is tested by production and prospecting trusts during exploration and reserves’ estimation of several dozen fields in Western Siberia: Kulginskoye, Shirotnoye, Yuzhno-Tambaevskoye, etc. (Tomsk Geophysical Trust, 1997-2002); Dvurechenskoe, Zapadno-Moiseevskoe, Talovoe, Krapivinskoe, Ontonigayskoe, etc. (TomskNIPIneft, 2002–2013).

Effects of incomplete parameterization on full-wavefield viscoelastic seismic data for petrophysical reservoir properties

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. O9-O17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra K. Tiwari ◽  
George A. McMechan
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Input Data ◽  
Elastic Model ◽  
Quality Factors ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Estimated Parameters ◽  
Model Parameterization ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Incomplete Model

In inversion of viscoelastic full-wavefield seismic data, the choice of model parameterization influences the uncertainties and biases in estimating seismic and petrophysical parameters. Using an incomplete model parameterization results in solutions in which the effects of missing parameters are attributed erroneously to the parameters that are included. Incompleteness in this context means assuming the earth is elastic rather than viscoelastic. The inclusion of compressional and shear-wave quality factors [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in inversion gives better estimates of reservoir properties than the less complete (elastic) model parameterization. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are sensitive primarily to fluid types and saturations. The parameter correlations are sensitive also to the model parameterization. As noise increases in the viscoelastic input data, the resolution of the estimated parameters decreases, but the parameter correlations are relatively unaffected by modest noise levels.

Geostatistical Inversion in Carbonate Reservoirs to Map Reservoir Quality With High Predictability – A Case Study From Onshore Abu Dhabi

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Al Naqbi ◽  
J Ahmed ◽  
J Vargas Rios ◽  
Y Utami ◽  
A Elila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Pore Volume ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Static Model ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Geostatistical Inversion ◽  
High Predictability ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The Thamama group of reservoirs consist of porous carbonates laminated with tight carbonates, with pronounced lateral heterogeneities in porosity, permeability, and reservoir thickness. The main objective of our study was mapping variations and reservoir quality prediction away from well control. As the reservoirs were thin and beyond seismic resolution, it was vital that the facies and porosity be mapped in high resolution, with a high predictability, for successful placement of horizontal wells for future development of the field. We established a unified workflow of geostatistical inversion and rock physics to characterize the reservoirs. Geostatistical inversion was run in static models that were converted from depth to time domain. A robust two-way velocity model was built to map the depth grid and its zones on the time seismic data. This ensured correct placement of the predicted high-resolution elastic attributes in the depth static model. Rock physics modeling and Bayesian classification were used to convert the elastic properties into porosity and lithology (static rock-type (SRT)), which were validated in blind wells and used to rank the multiple realizations. In the geostatistical pre-stack inversion, the elastic property prediction was constrained by the seismic data and controlled by variograms, probability distributions and a guide model. The deterministic inversion was used as a guide or prior model and served as a laterally varying mean. Initially, unconstrained inversion was tested by keeping all wells as blind and the predictions were optimized by updating the input parameters. The stochastic inversion results were also frequency filtered in several frequency bands, to understand the impact of seismic data and variograms on the prediction. Finally, 30 wells were used as input, to generate 80 realizations of P-impedance, S-impedance, Vp/Vs, and density. After converting back to depth, 30 additional blind wells were used to validate the predicted porosity, with a high correlation of more than 0.8. The realizations were ranked based on the porosity predictability in blind wells combined with the pore volume histograms. Realizations with high predictability and close to the P10, P50 and P90 cases (of pore volume) were selected for further use. Based on the rock physics analysis, the predicted lithology classes were associated with the geological rock-types (SRT) for incorporation in the static model. The study presents an innovative approach to successfully integrate geostatistical inversion and rock physics with static modeling. This workflow will generate seismically constrained high-resolution reservoir properties for thin reservoirs, such as porosity and lithology, which are seamlessly mapped in the depth domain for optimized development of the field. It will also account for the uncertainties in the reservoir model through the generation of multiple equiprobable realizations or scenarios.

Unsupervised machine learning using 3D seismic data applied to reservoir evaluation and rock type identification

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-69
Author(s):  
Marwa Hussein ◽  
Robert R. Stewart ◽  
Deborah Sacrey ◽  
Jonny Wu ◽  
Rajas Athale
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Rock Type ◽  
Seismic Attributes ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Unsupervised Machine Learning ◽  
Amplitude Data ◽  
3D Seismic Data

Net reservoir discrimination and rock type identification play vital roles in determining reservoir quality, distribution, and identification of stratigraphic baffles for optimizing drilling plans and economic petroleum recovery. Although it is challenging to discriminate small changes in reservoir properties or identify thin stratigraphic barriers below seismic resolution from conventional seismic amplitude data, we have found that seismic attributes aid in defining the reservoir architecture, properties, and stratigraphic baffles. However, analyzing numerous individual attributes is a time-consuming process and may have limitations for revealing small petrophysical changes within a reservoir. Using the Maui 3D seismic data acquired in offshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand, we generate typical instantaneous and spectral decomposition seismic attributes that are sensitive to lithologic variations and changes in reservoir properties. Using the most common petrophysical and rock typing classification methods, the rock quality and heterogeneity of the C1 Sand reservoir are studied for four wells located within the 3D seismic volume. We find that integrating the geologic content of a combination of eight spectral instantaneous attribute volumes using an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm (self-organizing maps [SOMs]) results in a classification volume that can highlight reservoir distribution and identify stratigraphic baffles by correlating the SOM clusters with discrete net reservoir and flow-unit logs. We find that SOM classification of natural clusters of multiattribute samples in the attribute space is sensitive to subtle changes within the reservoir’s petrophysical properties. We find that SOM clusters appear to be more sensitive to porosity variations compared with lithologic changes within the reservoir. Thus, this method helps us to understand reservoir quality and heterogeneity in addition to illuminating thin reservoirs and stratigraphic baffles.

Applications of quantitative prestack seismic analysis to unconventional resource play characterization in the Permian/Delaware Basin

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong Hoang ◽  
Arcangelo Sena ◽  
Benjamin Lascaud
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Yield Attributes ◽  
Horizontal Drilling ◽  
Delaware Basin ◽  
Unconventional Resource

The characterization of shale plays involves an understanding of tectonic history, geologic settings, reservoir properties, and the in-situ stresses of the potential producing zones in the subsurface. The associated hydrocarbons are generally recovered by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Historically, seismic data have been used mainly for structural interpretation of the shale reservoirs. A primary benefit of surface seismic has been the ability to locate and avoid drilling into shallow carbonate karsting zones, salt structures, and basement-related major faults which adversely affect the ability to drill and complete the well effectively. More recent advances in prestack seismic data analysis yield attributes that appear to be correlated to formation lithology, rock strength, and stress fields. From these, we may infer preferential drilling locations or sweet spots. Knowledge and proper utilization of these attributes may prove valuable in the optimization of drilling and completion activities. In recent years, geophysical data have played an increasing role in supporting well planning, hydraulic fracturing, well stacking, and spacing. We have implemented an integrated workflow combining prestack seismic inversion and multiattribute analysis, microseismic data, well-log data, and geologic modeling to demonstrate key applications of quantitative seismic analysis utilized in developing ConocoPhillips' acreage in the Delaware Basin located in Texas. These applications range from reservoir characterization to well planning/execution, stacking/spacing optimization, and saltwater disposal. We show that multidisciplinary technology integration is the key for success in unconventional play exploration and development.

THE INTEGRATED USE OF PETROPHYSICAL, AVO, SEISMIC INVERSION AND 3D VISUALISATION TOOLS FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERISATION

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
A.G. Sena ◽  
T.M. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Well Log ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Geological Interpretation ◽  
3D Visualisation ◽  
Quantitative Understanding ◽  
Inversion Techniques

The successful exploration for new reservoirs in mature areas, as well as the optimal development of existing fields, requires the integration of unconventional geological and geophysical techniques. In particular, the calibration of 3D seismic data to well log information is crucial to obtain a quantitative understanding of reservoir properties. The advent of new technology for prestack seismic data analysis and 3D visualisation has resulted in improved fluid and lithology predictions prior to expensive drilling. Increased reservoir resolution has been achieved by combining seismic inversion with AVO analysis to minimise exploration risk.In this paper we present an integrated and systematic approach to prospect evaluation in an oil/gas field. We will show how petrophysical analysis of well log data can be used as a feasibility tool to determine the fluid and lithology discrimination capabilities of AVO and inversion techniques. Then, a description of effective AVO and prestack inversion tools for reservoir property quantification will be discussed. Finally, the incorporation of the geological interpretation and the use of 3D visualisation will be presented as a key integration tool for the discovery of new plays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document