scholarly journals Warwick Research Collective (Sharae Deckard, Nicolas Lawrence, Neil Lazarus, Graeme Mac Donald, Upamanyu Pablo Mukherjee, Stephen Shapiro, and Benita Parry), Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-120
Author(s):  
Cécile Girardin
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-322
Author(s):  
Dominic Davies

Through a close reading of Joe Sacco’s Paying the Land (2020), a graphic novel about the struggle of the Dene people in Canada’s Northwestern territories, this article shows how Sacco effects a “peripheral realism” that draws the systemic continuities of different phases of colonial modernity into view. The article then describes Sacco’s “terrestrial realism,” which combines his peripheral realism with the dialectical participation of the reader as well. Finally, in a concluding theoretical discussion, I consider how the practice of drawing allows us to think through a response to modernity’s combined and uneven development that is both materialist and decolonial at the same time. Although the former typically insists on singularity and totality, and the latter promotes a contradictory plurality, the peripheral and terrestrial realisms of Paying the Land suggest a way for theorists of world literature to find a point of methodological solidarity that is both in and against capitalist modernity’s gravitational force.


Author(s):  
Lorna Burns

This essay identifies in the materialist strand of world literature theory, especially Pascale Casanova and the Warwick Research Collective, a reliance upon a priori structures (the world-system) and prioritisation of the literary registration of inequality. By contrast, I contend, world-literary critics who wish to maintain the dissident spirit of postcolonialism ought to demonstrate a shared equality. By reference to the philosophies of Bruno Latour, Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Rancière, this essay sets out the case for an alternative to world-systems critique: one that maintains literature’s potential for creating new forms of resistance, dissent, and, crucially, equality.


Author(s):  
Paul Young

This chapter reads Dickens as ‘world literature’, in the sense that his writing constitutes ‘literature of the world-system—of the modern capitalist world-system’. Perhaps more than any other English writer of the period, it argues, Dickens captured the wide-ranging, empowered, profitable yet inherently uneven, unequal way that Britain in general, and London in particular, worked at the heart of nineteenth-century globalized modernity. It comprises three sections: first, it examines how Dickens’s fiction refuted the idea of British-led globalization as a free-flowing, fast-acting, all-encompassing phenomenon; second, it shows that at the same time Dickens’s novels revealed frictionally forceful, historically dynamic, materially significant global connections within the metropolitan topographies he represented; third, it draws on the theory of combined and uneven development as it considers how Dickens’s writing can be understood with regard to the socially divisive, violent impact of globalizing industrial capitalism—upon his own nation as well as the world beyond its shores.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 19-31
Author(s):  
Sandra Sousa

I draw first on Vivek Chibber's argument that postcolonial studies fails to provide an adequate basis for a theory of human rights and a practice of global solidarity. I then introduce the Warwick Research Collective's elaboration of a new theory of world literature constructed around the concept of “combined and uneven development.” I conclude by proposing a way out of the limitations of postcolonial studies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 430-463
Author(s):  
Wibsson Ribeiro Lopes

O presente artigo revisita as elaborações de Fredric Jameson sobre a Literatura do Terceiro Mundo e o debate que se seguiu às suas reflexões. Fazemos um apanhado das alterações e reparos que Jameson fez de seu pensamento ao longo das décadas de críticas e embates. Por fim, apresentamos uma hipótese de leitura das elaborações do Warwick Research Collective (Wreck) como respostas às críticas que Jameson sofreu e também como continuação de suas elaborações. Tanto o crítico estadunidense como o coletivo de pesquisadores representam com seus aportes teóricos uma via de debate para o marxismo na área dos estudos pós-coloniais dentro do campo literário, a partir da Teoria do Sistema-Mundo e da Teoria do Desenvolvimento Desigual e Combinado, contribuindo com a problemática da World-Literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document