Discretization and degeometrization: A new relational quantum physics and an alternate path to quantum gravity

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-463
Author(s):  
Harry Ian Epstein

A novel quantum mechanical framework in discrete space and time leads to the derivation of the relativistic energy equation and a potential path toward quantum gravity. A unique approach to geometry is also derived where pregeometric points containing intrinsic compactified geometries generate a topologically 4D cosmos with a local dynamical 3D geometry. An interpretation of the quantum mechanics wavefunction is considered as longitudinal density waves traveling through dynamical pregeometric points. Similarly, general relativity can be described as density variations of the pregeometric points caused by matter-energy distribution. A primordial quantum (Higgs) field emerging at the big bang that generates all the other quantum fields is considered. A four-dimensional structure of black holes, and dark matter and energy are discussed.

Universe ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Ana Alonso-Serrano ◽  
Marek Liška

This work is based on the formalism developed in the study of the thermodynamics of spacetime used to derive Einstein equations from the proportionality of entropy within an area. When low-energy quantum gravity effects are considered, an extra logarithmic term in the area is added to the entropy expression. Here, we present the derivation of the quantum modified gravitational dynamics from this modified entropy expression and discuss its main features. Furthermore, we outline the application of the modified dynamics to cosmology, suggesting the replacement of the Big Bang singularity with a regular bounce.


KronoScope ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. LePoire

This paper addresses the question of whether there are temporal patterns throughout history that might indicate underlying system dynamics. In the paper, I explore the rates of important events as a measure of time. Two periods of mathematical patterns are found in the decreasing rate of events following the Big Bang due to cooling and in the subsequent increase in rates due to complex adaptive systems evolving by capturing increasing energy flows. A potential inflection transition scenario for extension of this latter pattern of complex adaptive systems is explored. Our interpretation of these processes requires progress in the understanding of quantum physics and time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Blackledge ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

This paper considers a conceptual model that attempts to explain ‘Dark Matter’ and ‘Dark Energy’. The model is based on considering a gravitational field to be the result of a mass (a Higgs field) scattering pre-existing cosmic background space-time waves or ‘Uber-waves’. The term ‘Uber’ is used to denote an outstanding or supreme example of a particular kind of gravitational wave with cosmic-scale wavelengths that are far in excess of those associated with the gravitational waves generated by accelerating masses. Such waves are taken to be the very lowest frequency components associated with the spectrum of space-time waves generated by the ‘Big Bang’ and are supported by the expanding fabric of space-time produced at the point of the big bang, i.e. the lowest frequency components of a cosmological spectrum whose bandwidth is the a Planck frequency (~10∧43 Hz). Like electromagnetic waves, Uber waves are taken to propagate with an upper velocity consistent with the speed of light and interact with, and are scattered by, a Higgs field. This interaction produces the effect of a mass locally curving space-time, an idea that is contrary to the conventional model associated with General Relativity where mass is taken to curve space-time directly which otherwise remains ‘flat’. By assuming the pre-existence of background Uber waves, we consider the concave curvature of such waves to generate an apparent attractive gravitational force. This interaction produces the effect of a mass locally curving space-time, an idea that is contrary to the conventional model associated with General Relativity where mass is taken to curve space-time directly which otherwise remains ‘flat’. By assuming the pre-existence of background Uber waves, we consider the concave curvature of such waves to generate an apparent attractive gravitational force. This attractive force is taken to govern the formation of large scale structures of matter (galaxies and super-clusters of galaxies, for example) in the conventional sense but surrounded by a residual background gravitational field. It is this residual field that gives rise to the effect known as dark matter where more gravity (as an attractive only force) appears to be available than that which can be accounted for by the observed (luminous) mass, a luminosity that is generated primarily by nuclear fusion in stars. The convex curvature of Uber waves is considered to account for cosmic voids within which gravity is a repulsive force and where large scale structures of matter can therefore not be formed. This is considered to explain the super-large cosmic voids or super voids that are observed. These are regions of the universe where there is an absence of rich super clusters of matter. In these anti-gravity zones, only relatively small structures of matter can be formed by electrostatic forces alone which are then repelled from each other when their mass becomes significant enough for the force of anti-gravity to become significant. In such regions of an Uber wave, the matter generated from electrostatic forces builds up to produce a weak gravitational repulsive field due to the low mass density within a void. However, due to the immense size of these cosmic voids, they are taken to generate a net repulsive force which is considered to be the reason for the acceleration associated with the expansion of the universe; the effect of dark energy. This effect also accounts for the cosmic web structure in which luminescent matter appears to exist in relatively thin connective filaments. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual model and not to investigate the ideas proposed in any significant mathematical detail. This is accomplished by building up the ideas on a case-by-case basis, coupled with a series of thought experiments but without resorting to specific physical scales or the physical parameters associated with these scales other than, by default, the speed of light and Newton’s gravitational constant.


Author(s):  
Roger Penrose ◽  
Martin Gardner

What is there that is new to be learnt, concerning brains or minds, from what we have seen in the last chapter? Though we may have glimpsed some of the all-embracing physical principles underlying the directionality of our perceived ‘flow of time’, we seem, so far, to have gained no insights into the question of why we perceive time to flow or, indeed, why we perceive at all. In my opinion, much more radical ideas are needed. My presentation so far has not been particularly radical, though I have sometimes provided a different emphasis from what is usual. We have made our acquaintance with the second law of thermodynamics, and I have attempted to persuade the reader that the origin of this lawpresented to us by Nature in the particular form that she has indeed chosen - can be traced to an enormous geometrical constraint on the big bang origin of the universe: the Weyl curvature hypothesis. Some cosmologists might prefer to characterize this initial constraint somewhat differently, but such a restriction on the initial singularity is indeed necessary. The deductions that I am about to draw from this hypothesis will be considerably less conventional than is the hypothesis itself. I claim that we shall need a change in the very framework of the quantum theory! This change is to play its role when quantum mechanics becomes appropriately united with general relativity, i.e. in the sought-for theory of quantum gravity. Most physicists do not believe that quantum theory needs to change when it is united with general relativity. Moreover, they would argue that on a scale relevant to our brains the physical effects of any quantum gravity must be totally insignificant! They would say (very reasonably) that although such physical effects might indeed be important at the absurdly tiny distance scale known as the Planck length - which is 10-35 m, some 100000000000000000000 times smaller than the size of the tiniest subatomic particle - these effects should have no direct relevance whatever to phenomena at the far far larger ‘ordinary’ scales of, say, down only to 10-12m, where the chemical or electrical processes that are important to brain activity hold sway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document