Determination of Work Zone Capacity Using ELM, MPMR and GPR

Author(s):  
Sangeeta Roy ◽  
J. Jagan ◽  
Pijush Samui

This article examines the capability of Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Minimax Probability Machine Regression (MPMR) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for determination of Work Zone Capacity. Number of lanes, number of open lanes, work zone layout, length, lane width, percentage trucks, grade, speed, work intensity, darkness factor, and proximity of ramps have been adopted as inputs of ELM, MPMR and GPR. ELM has excellent generalization performance, rapid training speed and little human intervention. MPMR is developed based on the concept of minimax probability machine classification. It does not assume any data distribution. GPR is a probabilistic, and non-parametric model. In GPR, different kinds of prior knowledge can be applied. This article describes a comparative study between the ELM, MPMR and GPR models.

Author(s):  
Jagan J. ◽  
Swaptik Chowdhury ◽  
Pratik Goyal ◽  
Pijush Samui ◽  
Yıldırım Dalkiliç

The ultimate bearing capacity is an important criterion for the successful implementation of any geotechnical projects. This chapter studies the feasibility of employing Gaussian process regression (GPR), Extreme learning machine (ELM) and Minimax probability machine regression (MPMR) for prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation based on cohesionless soils. The developed models have been compared on the basis of coefficient of relation (R) values (GPR= 0.9625, ELM= 0.938, MPMR= 0.9625). The results show that MPMR is more efficient tool but the models of GPR and ELM also gives satisfactory results.


2016 ◽  
pp. 1590-1626
Author(s):  
Jagan J. ◽  
Swaptik Chowdhury ◽  
Pratik Goyal ◽  
Pijush Samui ◽  
Yıldırım Dalkiliç

The ultimate bearing capacity is an important criterion for the successful implementation of any geotechnical projects. This chapter studies the feasibility of employing Gaussian process regression (GPR), Extreme learning machine (ELM) and Minimax probability machine regression (MPMR) for prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation based on cohesionless soils. The developed models have been compared on the basis of coefficient of relation (R) values (GPR= 0.9625, ELM= 0.938, MPMR= 0.9625). The results show that MPMR is more efficient tool but the models of GPR and ELM also gives satisfactory results.


Author(s):  
Dhivya Subburaman ◽  
Jagan J. ◽  
Yıldırım Dalkiliç ◽  
Pijush Samui

First Order Second Moment Method (FOSM) is generally for determination of reliability of slope. This article adopts Minimax Probability Machine Regression (MPMR), Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for reliability analysis of slope by using FOSM. In this study, an example of soil slope is given regarding how the proposed GPR-based FOSM, MPMR-based FOSM and GRNN-based FOSM analysis can be carried out. GPR, GRNN and MPMR have been used as regression techniques. A comparative study has been carried out between the developed GPR, MPMR and GRNN models. The results show that MPMR gives better performance than the other models.


Author(s):  
Dhivya Subburaman ◽  
Jagan J. ◽  
Yıldırım Dalkiliç ◽  
Pijush Samui

First Order Second Moment Method (FOSM) is generally for determination of reliability of slope. This article adopts Minimax Probability Machine Regression (MPMR), Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for reliability analysis of slope by using FOSM. In this study, an example of soil slope is given regarding how the proposed GPR-based FOSM, MPMR-based FOSM and GRNN-based FOSM analysis can be carried out. GPR, GRNN and MPMR have been used as regression techniques. A comparative study has been carried out between the developed GPR, MPMR and GRNN models. The results show that MPMR gives better performance than the other models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document