relevance vector machine
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

584
(FIVE YEARS 137)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Author(s):  
Yu-Lin Gong ◽  
Ming-Jia Hu ◽  
Hui-Fang Yang ◽  
Bo Han

Abstract ReliefF algorithm was used to analyze the weight of each water quality evaluation factor, and then based on the Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was used to optimize the kernel width factor and hyperparameters of RVM to build a water quality evaluation model, and the experimental results of RVM, PSO-RVM, ReliefF-RVM and PSO-ReliefF-RVM were compared. The results show that ReliefF algorithm, combined with threshold value, selects 5 evaluation factors with significant weight from 8 evaluation factors, which reduces the amount of data used in the model, CSI index is used to calculate the separability of each evaluation factor combination. The results show that the overall separability of the combination is best when the evaluation factor with significant weight is reserved. When different water quality evaluation factors were included, the evaluation accuracy of PSO-ReliefF-RVM model reached 95.74%, 14.23% higher than that of RVM model, which verified the effectiveness of PSO algorithm and ReliefF algorithm, and had a higher guiding significance for the study of water quality grade evaluation. It has good practical application value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 107900
Author(s):  
Wei Feng ◽  
Qiaofeng Li ◽  
Qiuhai Lu ◽  
Chen Li ◽  
Bo Wang

Measurement ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 110621
Author(s):  
Xiangyu Chang ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Yiming Zhang ◽  
Feiqiu Wang ◽  
Zhaozhong Li

Author(s):  
Kevin Matsuno ◽  
Vidya Nandikolla

Abstract Brain computer interface (BCI) systems are developed in biomedical fields to increase the quality of life. The development of a six class BCI controller to operate a semi-autonomous robotic arm is presented. The controller uses the following mental tasks: imagined left/right hand squeeze, imagined left/right foot tap, rest, one physical task, and jaw clench. To design a controller, the locations of active electrodes are verified and an appropriate machine learning algorithm is determined. Three subjects, ages ranging between 22-27, participated in five sessions of motor imagery experiments to record their brainwaves. These recordings were analyzed using event related potential plots and topographical maps to determine active electrodes. BCILAB was used to train two, three, five, and six class BCI controllers using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and relevance vector machine (RVM) machine learning methods. The subjects' data was used to compare the two-method's performance in terms of error rate percentage. While a two class BCI controller showed the same accuracy for both methods, the three and five class BCI controllers showed the RVM approach having a higher accuracy than the LDA approach. For the five-class controller, error rate percentage was 33.3% for LDA and 29.2% for RVM. The six class BCI controller error rate percentage for both LDA and RVM was 34.5%. While the percentage values are the same, RVM was chosen as the desired machine learning algorithm based on the trend seen in the three and five class controller performances.


Author(s):  
Jitendra Khatti ◽  
◽  
Kamaldeep Singh Grover ◽  

The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Decision Tree (DT), Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) AI approaches are constructed in MATLAB R2020a with different hyperparameters namely, kernel function, leaf size, backpropagation algorithms, number of neurons and hidden layers to compute the permeability of soil. The present study is carried out using 158 datasets of soil. The soil dataset consists of fine content (FC), sand content (SC), liquid limit (LL), specific gravity (SG), plasticity index (PI), maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC), permeability (K). Excluding the permeability of soil, rest of properties of soil is used as input parameters of the AI models. The best architectural and optimum performance models are identified by comparing the performance of the models. Based on the performance of the AI models, the NISEK_K_GPR, 10LF_K_DT, Poly_K_RVM, and GDANN_K_10H5 models have been identified as the best architectural AI models. The comparison of performance of the best architectural models, it is observed that the NISEK_K_GPR model outperformed the other best architectural AI models. In this study, it is also observed that GPR model is outperformed ANN models because of small dataset. The performance of NISEK_K_GPR model is compared with models available in literature and it is concluded that the GPR model has better performance and least prediction error than models available in literature study.


2021 ◽  
pp. 367-375
Author(s):  
Hao Liang ◽  
Qiangfu Ren ◽  
Dongyang Zhang ◽  
Xingfa Zhao ◽  
Yu Guo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document