Technology Access Gap for Postsecondary Education

Author(s):  
Victoria Brown

Technology to learn the digital literacy skills required to attend postsecondary institutions or to access distance learning courses. Three groups of students are impacted by the lack of access to technology: (a) without broadband access, (b) students' low socioeconomic status, and (c) students' primary language is not English. Without digital literacy skills, selecting, applying, and fully participating in a postsecondary education is difficult. This chapter will outline the challenges these three groups of students have in accessing broadband, the impact the lack of access created in Florida, and solutions that were suggested to address lack of high speed broadband.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0020
Author(s):  
Alessandra L. Falk ◽  
Regina Hanstein ◽  
Chaiyaporn Kulsakdinun

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Socioeconomic status has been recognized throughout the medical literature, both within orthopedics and beyond, as a factor that influences outcomes after surgery, and can result in substandard care. Within the foot and ankle subspecialty, there is limited data regarding socioeconomic status and post-operative outcomes, with the current literature focusing on outcomes for diabetic feet. However, ankle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons. While a few studies have explored the impact of ankle fractures on employment and disability status, the effect of socioeconomic status on return to work post operatively has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of low socioeconomic status on return to work. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 592 medical charts of patients with CPT code 27766, 27792, 27814, 27822, 27823, 27827, 27829, 27826, 27828 from 2015-2018. Included were patients >18 yrs of age who sustained an acute ankle fracture, were employed prior to the injury, and with information on return to work after ankle surgery, zip code, race, ethnicity and insurance status. Excluded were patients who were not employed prior to their injury. Socioeconomic status was either defined by insurance status - Medicaid/Medicare, commercial, or workman’s compensation -, or by assessing socioeconomic status (SES) using medial household per capita income by zip code as generated and reported by the US National Census Bureau’s 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. The national dataset was divided into quartiles with the lowest quartile defined as low SES. Patients who had income that fell within this income category were classified as low SES. Results: 174 patients were included with an average follow-up of 10.2months. 22/174 (12.6%) patients didn’t return to work post-operatively. Univariate analysis identified non-sedentary work to decrease the likelihood of return to work (HR:0.637; p=0.03). Patients with a low SES were more prevalent in the no return group compared to the return to work group (86% vs 60%; p=0.028). 95% of patients with low SES were a minority compared to 56% with average/high SES (p<0.005). Patients with low SES had a higher BMI (p=0.026), a longer hospitalization (p=0.04) and more wound complications (p=0.032). Insurance type didn’t affect return to work (p=0.158). Patients with workman’s compensation had a longer follow-up time and a longer time to return to work compared to other insurances (p<0.005 for each comparison). Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status based on income, not insurance type, affected return to work after an ankle fracture ORIF. Patients with workman’s compensation took a longer time to return to work compared to other insurance types. These findings warrants the need to consider socioeconomic status when allocating resources to treat these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Jerath ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Dennis T. Ko ◽  
Harindra C. Wijeysundera ◽  
Stephen Fremes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Socioeconomic status is an important but understudied determinant of preoperative health status and postoperative outcomes. Previous work has focused on the impact of socioeconomic status on mortality, hospital stay, or complications. However, individuals with low socioeconomic status are also likely to have fewer supports to facilitate them remaining at home after hospital discharge. Thus, such patients may be less likely to return home over the short and intermediate term after major surgery. The newly validated outcome, days alive and out of hospital, may be highly suited to evaluating the impact of socioeconomic status on this postdischarge period. The study aimed to determine the association of socioeconomic status with short and intermediate term postoperative recovery as measured by days alive and out of hospital. Methods The authors evaluated data from 724,459 adult patients who had one of 13 elective major noncardiac surgical procedures between 2006 and 2017. Socioeconomic status was measured by median neighborhood household income (categorized into quintiles). Primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital at 30 days, while secondary outcomes included days alive and out of hospital at 90 and 180 days, and 30-day mortality. Results Compared to the highest income quintile, individuals in the lowest quintile had higher unadjusted risks of postoperative complications (6,049 of 121,099 [5%] vs. 6,216 of 160,495 [3.9%]) and 30-day mortality (731 of 121,099 [0.6%] vs. 701 of 160,495 [0.4%]) and longer mean postoperative length of stay (4.9 vs. 4.4 days). From lowest to highest income quintile, the mean adjusted days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery varied between 24.5 to 24.9 days. Conclusions Low socioeconomic status is associated with fewer days alive and out of hospital after surgery. Further research is needed to examine the underlying mechanisms and develop posthospital interventions to improve postoperative recovery in patients with fewer socioeconomic resources. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
Camila DALLAZEN ◽  
Márcia Regina VÍTOLO

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the impact of excessive maternal weight on the early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding Methods: This is a longitudinal study including mother-infant dyads of low socioeconomic status receiving prenatal care in Health Care Centers in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. A structured questionnaire was administered to women in the last trimester of pregnancy, including weight measurements. Another interview was conducted six months after delivery, and data on infant feeding practices were collected and maternal height was measured. Maternal nutritional status was assessed using body mass index values according to gestational age. Discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding before 4 months was considered a low duration rate Results: A total of 619 mother-infant dyads were evaluated. The prevalence of maternal overweight in the third trimester of pregnancy was 51%. The median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 2.0 months. After adjustment for possible confounding factors, no association between maternal overweight and early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding was identified. Maternal smoking was identified as a risk factor (1.23, 95%CI=1.13-1.35) for early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding Conclusion: Excessive maternal weight was not confirmed as a risk factor for early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding. However, women who reported being smokers had a higher risk of early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding than those who did not smoke. This indicates the need for public health interventions to promote smoking cessation during pregnancy and in the postpartum period because of the deleterious effects of this habit on maternal and infant health.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1711-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan E Axelrad ◽  
Rajani Sharma ◽  
Monika Laszkowska ◽  
Christopher Packey ◽  
Richard Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Low socioeconomic status has been linked with numerous poor health outcomes, but data are limited regarding the impact of insurance status on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outcomes. We aimed to characterize utilization of healthcare resources by IBD patients based on health insurance status, using Medicaid enrollment as a proxy for low socioeconomic status. Methods We retrospectively identified adult patients with IBD engaged in a colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy program from July 2007 to June 2017. Our primary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations, biologic infusions, and steroid exposure, stratified by insurance status. We compared patients who had ever been enrolled in Medicaid with all other patients. Results Of 947 patients with IBD, 221 (23%) had been enrolled in Medicaid. Compared with patients with other insurance types, patients with Medicaid had higher rates of ever being admitted to the hospital (77.6% vs 42.6%, P &lt; 0.0001) or visiting the ED (90.5% vs 38.4%, P &lt; 0.0001). When adjusted for sex, age at first colonoscopy, and ethnicity, patients with Medicaid had a higher rate of inpatient hospitalizations (Rate ratio [RR] 2.95; 95% CI 2.59–3.36) and ED visits (RR 4.24; 95% CI 3.82–4.70) compared to patients with other insurance. Patients with Medicaid had significantly higher prevalence of requiring steroids (62.4% vs 37.7%, P &lt; 0.0001), and after adjusting for the same factors, the odds of requiring steroids in the patients with Medicaid was increased (OR 3.77; 95% CI 2.53–5.62). Conclusions Medicaid insurance was a significant predictor of IBD care and outcomes. Patients with Medicaid may have less engagement in IBD care and seek emergency care more often.


10.2196/13854 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e13854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélina Côté ◽  
Annie Lapointe ◽  
Catherine Laramée ◽  
Simone Lemieux ◽  
Sophie Desroches ◽  
...  

Background NutriQuébec is a Web-based prospective study on the relationship between diet and health as well as the impact of food-related health policies in the adult population of Québec, Canada. Recruitment and retention of individuals with a low socioeconomic status (SES) in such a study are known to be challenging, yet critical for achieving representativeness of the entire population. Objective This study aimed to identify the behavioral, normative, and control beliefs of individuals with a low SES regarding participation in the NutriQuébec project and to identify their preferences regarding recruitment methods. Methods A total of four focus groups were conducted in community centers located in low-income areas of Québec City, Canada. On the basis of the theory of planned behavior, participants’ beliefs associated with attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control regarding hypothetical participation in the NutriQuébec project were identified. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded by two analysts. Results Participants (16 men and 12 women) were aged between 28 and 72 years, and a majority of the participants had an annual household income of Can $19,999 or less. The main perceived advantages of participating in the NutriQuébec project were contributing to improved collective health and supporting research. The only disadvantage identified was the risk of having to fill out too many questionnaires. Participants could not, in general, identify persons from their entourage who would approve or disapprove their participation in the study. The main facilitators identified were obtaining a brief health assessment and the ability to complete questionnaires in a way that is not Web-based. The main barrier was the lack of internet access. The preferred means of recruitment were through social media, television, and community centers. Conclusions These results provide insightful information regarding the best methods and messages to use in order to recruit and retain individuals with a low SES in a population-based prospective study on lifestyle and health on the internet.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Suppl-4) ◽  
pp. S887-91
Author(s):  
Muhammad Talha Bin Nazir ◽  
Muhammad Mujtaba Ali Siddiqui ◽  
Hamid Sharif Khan ◽  
Mohsin Saif ◽  
Shabana Kousar ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the impact of a dedicated hospital based warfarin clinic assessing patients’ knowledge and improving the drug compliance in a tertiary cardiac center of Pakistan. Study Design: Descriptive cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology from Jan 2019 to Jul 2019. Methodology: Patients presenting in the anticoagulation clinic using warfarin for different cardiovascular indications from Jan to Jul 2019 were included in the study. Patients were assessed for their underlying cardiovascular condition, their international normalized ratio levels checked using a standard technique. The patients’ knowledge about the drug and the degree of compliance was judged by eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The patients were thoroughly counseled and reassessed six months later assessing the improvement in compliance with the warfarin therapy. Results: Total number of 401 patients using warfarin for different cardiovascular diseases were studied. The mean age was 43.3 ± 13.3 years with 218 (54.5%) patients being male. Most of the patient 300 (75%) belonged to the low socio-economic group with average monthly income of <PKR 10,000/$65. In addition, 61.4% of the patients belonged to the rural set up. Mechanical valve replacement made the bulk of the indication for warfarin therapy with 44.7% of patients with mechanical mitral valve, 14% with mechanical double valve and 13% with mechanical aortic valve replacement. 13.7% of the patients on warfarin therapy had atrial fibrillation while 6.9% either had venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism. The compliance was good in 76.1% on baseline visit which increased to 86.7% on the first visit at six-month interval. Residence in rural areas and low socioeconomic status were the two factors contributing to poorer compliance which improved on the first visit. Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status and residents of rural areas were resulting in comparatively poorer compliance with warfarin therapy which improved by educating such patients in specific warfarin clinic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 2473-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. NEWMAN ◽  
J. S. LEON ◽  
P. A. REBOLLEDO ◽  
E. SCALLAN

SUMMARYFoodborne illness is a major cause of morbidity and loss of productivity in developed nations. Although low socioeconomic status (SES) is generally associated with negative health outcomes, its impact on foodborne illness is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between SES and laboratory-confirmed illness caused by eight important foodborne pathogens. We completed this systematic review using PubMed for all papers published between 1 January 1980 and 1 January 2013 that measured the association between foodborne illness and SES in highly developed countries and identified 16 studies covering four pathogens. The effect of SES varied across pathogens: the majority of identified studies for Campylobacter, salmonellosis, and E. coli infection showed an association between high SES and illness. The single study of listeriosis showed illness was associated with low SES. A reporting bias by SES could not be excluded. SES should be considered when targeting consumer-level public health interventions for foodborne pathogens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document