The Empirical Evidence of the Effect of Written Corrective Feedback From Information Processing Perspective

2018 ◽  
pp. 30-56
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Theoretical Expectation ◽  
Affective Factors ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Information Processing Perspective ◽  
English Articles ◽  
Positive Effect

The theoretical perspectives reviewed in the previous chapter have led many in the field to believe that written CF can have a positive effect on L2 learning. The recent written CF studies reviewed in this chapter confirmed the theoretical expectation. However, it needs to be noted that although more explicit written CF types, such as metalinguistic explanation, direct correction, and direct correction plus metalinguistic explanation were proved to facilitate the learning of English articles and past tense for students of different proficiency levels, more research is needed to find out the correlation between the complexity and written CF type. Furthermore, whether these types of written CF could facilitate the learning of more complex language features needs to be examined. Last but not least, learner's factors, including affective factors, learning aptitude, motivation, and so on need to be investigated regarding the extent to which they may have an impact on the effect of written CF.

The Theoretical Expectation of the Effect of Written Corrective Feedback From Information Processing Perspective

2018 ◽  
pp. 12-29
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Theoretical Explanation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Theoretical Expectation ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
L2 Development ◽  
Information Processing Perspective ◽  
Interactive View

Chapter 2 explains how written CF can facilitate the process of information processing in Gass' model from a micro perspective, and also in a macro view, according to McLaughlin's model, and Anderson's model. The theoretical explanation makes us to believe written CF has the potential to benefit L2 development. The other half of the chapter provides an understanding of written CF in an interactive view of SLA and leads to the conclusion that all the factors involved in the interactions between teacher and learner should be taken into consideration when providing written CF.

scholarly journals Can Explicit Written Corrective Feedback Develop Grammatical and Lexical Accuracy of Saudi EFL Learners?

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahla Al-Hazzani ◽  
Sultan Altalhab
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Saudi Students ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Made In

Saudi students encounter many problems in writing skill as several studies revealed (e.g. Alhazmi, 2006; Alsamdani, 2010). Providing effective and useful feedback may help to overcome these challenges. Therefore, this study examines the effect of teachers’ written corrective feedback on female Saudi EFL students’ written essays and to what extent it affects students’ written grammatical and lexical accuracy. The sample comprises 50 foundation level students, across two groups: an experimental group (n=29) and a control group (n=21). Data were gathered over a 10-week period using a pre-/post-test/delayed post-test design for comparable groups. The findings show that although many errors were made in the writing performances, the students in the experimental group had significantly better achievements than the students in the control group on the measure. The results lend support to the efficiency of teachers’ written corrective feedback, showing it has a significant positive effect on the participants’ grammatical and lexical accuracy.

The effects of corrective feedback with and without revision on enhancing L2 pragmatic performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Thuy Minh ◽  
Do Thi Thanh Ha ◽  
Pham Thi Thanh Thuy ◽  
Nguyen Tuan Anh
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
The Third ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Completion Task ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Pragmatic Knowledge ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Pragmatic Performance

Abstract This study investigated the efficacy of different feedback conditions in developing accurate and fluent production of L2 English email requests. Sixty-nine intermediate-level Vietnamese EFL university students were randomly assigned to one control and three experimental groups. All the four groups received three hours of explicit metapragmatic instruction on email requests, but only the experimental groups received written corrective feedback on their pragmatic production. One experimental group received feedback without opportunity for revision. Another experimental group received one cycle of feedback and revision, and the third group two cycles of feedback and revision. Results of a Discourse Completion Task (DCT) pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test indicated that the combination of instruction and feedback had a positive effect on the accuracy of learners’ pragmatic performance. However, no clear-cut evidence for the effect of revision on the fluency of learners’ pragmatic performance was found in the study. The findings highlight the effectiveness of corrective feedback and revision in consolidating emergent L2 pragmatic knowledge, but further research is needed to understand how much revision is sufficient to facilitate fluency development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document