scholarly journals Can Explicit Written Corrective Feedback Develop Grammatical and Lexical Accuracy of Saudi EFL Learners?

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahla Al-Hazzani ◽  
Sultan Altalhab
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Saudi Students ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Made In

Saudi students encounter many problems in writing skill as several studies revealed (e.g. Alhazmi, 2006; Alsamdani, 2010). Providing effective and useful feedback may help to overcome these challenges. Therefore, this study examines the effect of teachers’ written corrective feedback on female Saudi EFL students’ written essays and to what extent it affects students’ written grammatical and lexical accuracy. The sample comprises 50 foundation level students, across two groups: an experimental group (n=29) and a control group (n=21). Data were gathered over a 10-week period using a pre-/post-test/delayed post-test design for comparable groups. The findings show that although many errors were made in the writing performances, the students in the experimental group had significantly better achievements than the students in the control group on the measure. The results lend support to the efficiency of teachers’ written corrective feedback, showing it has a significant positive effect on the participants’ grammatical and lexical accuracy.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Corrective Feedback on L2 Writings of EFL Students

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senanur ÇINAR
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Private University ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Made In

Errors have been perceived as problems within the process of teaching and learning a language. However, especially in writing, learners are able to benefit from their errors with the help of corrective feedback. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of explicit corrective feedback in Turkish EFL learners’ writing. The participants of the study were 43 intermediate level Turkish EFL students at a private university in Turkey. There were one experimental, 21 students, and one control group, 22 students. As the data collection both groups were administered a pre-test, a post-test and a delayed post-test as a paper and pencil tests. The experimental group received explicit corrective feedback with extended comments on their errors, and the control group received no feedback. Their errors were only underlined without providing correction. The number of errors that each group made in the writings was compared to each other. In order to ensure the reliability and validity, the participants were administered a 5 Likert scale questionnaire after the writing sessions. The results revealed that the experimental group who received explicit corrective feedback made fewer errors than the control group who did not receive feedback on their L2 writings. Besides that, the experimental group made fewer mistakes in their tests compared to the previous ones. Thus, the findings of the questionnaire revealed that students had a positive view about corrective feedback their L2 writings especially if it has extended comments.

The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact Lao learners’ beliefs have on uptake

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Rummel ◽  
John Bitchener
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Past Tense ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Feedback Preferences ◽  
The Impact

This article presents the results of a study examining the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (CF) on the simple past tense and the impact beliefs may have on students’ uptake of the feedback they receive. A seven-week study was carried out with 42 advanced EFL learners in Vientiane, Laos. Students’ beliefs about written CF were first collected, after which they were assigned to either the control group or to groups that received written CF according to their feedback preferences. Students produced four pieces of writing (pre-test, post-test and two delayed post-tests) that responded to four different narrative prompts. The targeted grammatical feature was the simple past tense. The study found that the three feedback groups showed significant improvement in the use of the targeted feature while the control group did not. Furthermore, the results seemed to indicate that beliefs might have impacted on the extent to which the Lao students improved their linguistic accuracy because the students who received their preferred type of feedback were more successful at eliminating the targeted errors than the ones who did not.

The effects of corrective feedback with and without revision on enhancing L2 pragmatic performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Thuy Minh ◽  
Do Thi Thanh Ha ◽  
Pham Thi Thanh Thuy ◽  
Nguyen Tuan Anh
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
The Third ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Completion Task ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Pragmatic Knowledge ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Pragmatic Performance

Abstract This study investigated the efficacy of different feedback conditions in developing accurate and fluent production of L2 English email requests. Sixty-nine intermediate-level Vietnamese EFL university students were randomly assigned to one control and three experimental groups. All the four groups received three hours of explicit metapragmatic instruction on email requests, but only the experimental groups received written corrective feedback on their pragmatic production. One experimental group received feedback without opportunity for revision. Another experimental group received one cycle of feedback and revision, and the third group two cycles of feedback and revision. Results of a Discourse Completion Task (DCT) pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test indicated that the combination of instruction and feedback had a positive effect on the accuracy of learners’ pragmatic performance. However, no clear-cut evidence for the effect of revision on the fluency of learners’ pragmatic performance was found in the study. The findings highlight the effectiveness of corrective feedback and revision in consolidating emergent L2 pragmatic knowledge, but further research is needed to understand how much revision is sufficient to facilitate fluency development.

The Impact of Direct-indirect Corrective E-feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Accuracy

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Hassan Seiffedin ◽  
Samah Mohammed Fahim El-Sakka
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gain Scores ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Writing Accuracy ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Experimental Group

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of direct-indirect corrective feedback via e-mail on the writing accuracy students at kindergarten section, Suez Faculty of Education, Egypt. The design of the study was a pre-post quasi experimental design. The main instrument of the study was a pre-post writing test.  The participants were forty eight junior EFL students at the kindergarten section, randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (n=25) and control group (n=23). Both groups were tested using the pre-post writing test before and after the experiment. During the treatment, the experimental group received direct-indirect teacher corrective feedback on their writing compositions via e-mail while the control group received no feedback. Differences between the participants’ mean scores on the pre test and post test were calculated for each group separately using Paired Samples T-Test which revealed significant differences between the pre-test and posttest of the experimental group mean scores. Independent Samples T-Test was used to calculate the differences between the experimental and the control groups’ mean gain scores on the pre and post test of writing. Significant differences existed in favor of the experimental group mean gain scores.

scholarly journals Fostering EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Using Edmodo

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Nuha Abdullah Alsmari
Keyword(s):  
Writing Skills ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
College Level ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Saudi Students ◽  
Writing Class ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Experimental Group

The present study sought to investigate the effect of using Edmodo, a Web 2.0 tool, as a supportive blended learning tool in developing EFL Saudi students’ paragraph writing skills at Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University, KSA. Eighty students majoring in English at the college level one participated in the study. The participants were randomly selected for an experimental group (taught by using Edmodo) and a control group (taught without using Edmodo). Two main tools were devised to collect data: Oxford Placement Test (OPT) and Test of Paragraph Writing Skills (TPWS). The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially by running a t-test, using SPSS 16.0, to calculate the differences between the mean scores of the two groups pre- and post-intervention. The results showed statistically significant differences in the post-test in favor of the experimental group. Integrating Edmodo into the writing class was found to be highly beneficial in developing EFL students’ writing abilities, up to paragraph level. The use of Edmodo also enriched students’ knowledge and increased their motivation to learn.

The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Enayati ◽  
Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Regarding the large amount of vocabulary that learners should learn and the limited amount of time available in the EFL classes, Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is considered as an attractive option for learning. One specific benefit of using CALL vocabulary instruction is to provide systematic repetition of words, ensuring that learned words are not forgotten. The objective of current investigation is to examine the effect of CALL on Iranian intermediate learners’ vocabulary learning. The researchers used Tell Me More (TEM) software for this objective. This investigation used Preliminary English Test (PET) as a standardized measurement to seek the level of the subjects in terms of language proficiency. Then, the researchers assigned the participants into two groups: experimental group and control group. Experimental group included 31 EFL students and control group involved 30 EFL students. 80 items were administered as pre-test to evaluate the participants’ previous knowledge of English in respect to the vocabularies. The researchers taught the students of both groups for 12 sessions. The TEM software was used as treatment in experimental group and the control group received no treatment. The taught words were the same in both groups. After 12 sessions, the 65 items were administered as post-test in order to compare the results of the scores of two groups and decide about the effectiveness of the treatment. The data were analyzed through running the Independent sample t-test. The results of post-test showed that the participants of experimental group outperformed the control group and had positive attitudes towards CALL. The results of this study may be useful for EFL teachers, EFL learners, and syllabus designers.

scholarly journals Computerized Corpus Based Investigation of the Use of Multi-Word Combinations and the Developmental Stages by Tertiary Level EFL Learners

10.29007/fs4s ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sukru Ozbay ◽  
Mustafa Naci Kayaoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Black Sea Region ◽  
Reading Processes ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Experimental Group

It is an old consensus by now that languages all throughout the world consist of prefabricated chunks or multi-word combinations which are important for EFL learners in their efforts to perceive and produce language of native speakers in the form of combinations or chunks. The combinative nature of English language lends itself in various ways and sometimes they are called as “collocations” which constitute the biggest part of these chunks. In this respect, it is understandable that collocation learning plays a significant role for EFL learners. Thus, the primary purpose of this research is to explore whether corpus based explicit collocation instruction will help the EFL students gain awareness of collocations. Another purpose is to reveal the extent to which EFL learners recognize collocations in different contexts. The final purpose is to observe whether this informed exposure will result in better reading performances in English. The research reported on an experimental study regarding the effect of corpus-based explicit collocation instruction on EFL students' reading performance. The data for the study were obtained through pre-test and post- test scores and interview which included open-ended questions. Tertiary level EFL students (n=50) from the English department of a middle sized university in the Eastern Black Sea region in Turkey participated in the study and the study lasted for eight weeks (spring term). The control group (n = 25) received in-class reading instruction and the experimental group (n = 25) integrated collocations into their reading processes. The study investigated whether there were any differences between the experimental and the control groups in terms of gaining awareness of collocations and exhibiting better reading performances after corpus-based explicit collocation instruction is delivered on a scheduled-order. Based on the analyses of students' reading scores, the main findings showed that the experimental group showed significant improvement when compared to the control group. Both post-test scores and the answers of the students participated in the interview proved that corpus-based explicit collocation instruction had positive effect on the awareness level and reading performances of EFL students. The study, therefore, concludes that English as a Foreign Language learners' use of collocations or word combinations has potential to create more effective reading performance.

Effect of Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback on Saudi EFL University Students’ Writing Achievements

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sultan H. Alharbi
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
English Language ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Control Group ◽  
King Saud University ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
And Control ◽  
Positive Effect

<p class="2"><span lang="X-NONE">The current study aims to examine the effect of teachers’ written corrective feedback (CF) on male Saudi EFL university students’ writing achievements. It also attempts to explore how these Saudi EFL students perceive their teachers’ CF. The sample of the current study comprised of 50 student participants chosen at random from the Department of English Language and Translation (DELT) in the College of Languages and Translation (COLT) at King Saud University (KSU). The students were distributed into two groups: experimental group (n=25) and control group (n=25). Data were gathered over a 10-week period through a pre-/posttest design for comparable groups. The results indicated that the students in the experiment group achieved better than the students in the control group on the measure, indicating that teachers’ written CF had a significant positive effect on participants’ writing achievements. The results also indicated that the participants revealed a positive attitude toward teachers’ written CF. The study concludes with the limitations and implications of the findings as well as recommendations for future research.</span></p>

scholarly journals The Potential of Corpus Based Collocation Instruction on the Awareness Levels of the Turkish EFL Students in Terms of Reading Performances

10.29007/k2lr ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sukru Ozbay
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
English Language ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Black Sea Region ◽  
Reading Processes ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Experimental Group

It is an old consensus by now that languages all throughout the world consist of prefabricated chunks or multi-word combinations which are important for EFL learners in their efforts to perceive and produce language of native speakers in the form of combinations or chunks. The combinative nature of English language lends itself in various ways and sometimes they are called as “collocations” which constitute the biggest part of these chunks. In this respect, it is understandable that collocation learning plays a significant role for EFL learners. Thus, the primary purpose of this research is to explore whether corpus based explicit collocation instruction will help the EFL students gain awareness of collocations. Another purpose is to reveal the extent to which EFL learners recognize collocations in different contexts. The final purpose is to observe whether this informed exposure will result in better reading performances in English. The research reported on an experimental study regarding the effect of corpus-based explicit collocation instruction on EFL students' reading performance. The data for the study were obtained through pre-test and post- test scores and interview which included open-ended questions. Tertiary level EFL students (n=50) from the English department of a middle sized university in the Eastern Black Sea region in Turkey participated in the study and the study lasted for eight weeks (spring term). The control group (n = 25) received in-class reading instruction and the experimental group (n = 25) integrated collocations into their reading processes. The study investigated whether there were any differences between the experimental and the control groups in terms of gaining awareness of collocations and exhibiting better reading performances after corpus-based explicit collocation instruction is delivered on a scheduled-order. Based on the analyses of students' reading scores, the main findings showed that the experimental group showed significant improvement when compared to the control group. Both post-test scores and the answers of the students participated in the interview proved that corpus-based explicit collocation instruction had positive effect on the awareness level and reading performances of EFL students. The study, therefore, concludes that English as a Foreign Language learners' use of collocations or word combinations has potential to create more effective reading performance.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on English Collocation Competency: A Quasi – Experiment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Abang Fhaeizdhyall
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
And Control ◽  
Esl Learners ◽  
Positive Effect

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (WCF) on English collocational competency of high-performing ESL learners. The study also sought to compare possible differences in the effect of two WCF strategies that help the researcher in identifying the appropriate WCF strategy in improving learners’ collocational competency in the context of the study. Additionally, retention effect of WCF is also investigated in delayed post-tests. Eighty-eight high-performing ESL learners of a public university participated in the quasi-experimental study of two experimental groups and one control group. A series of test namely pre-test, immediate post-test and delayed post-test was administered to collect the data. The groups are labelled ‘Direct group’ that received direct WCF treatment (n=33), ‘Indirect group’ that received indirect WCF (n=25), and ‘Control group’ that received no treatment (n=25). A set of collocation test that was developed by Gyllstad (2009) was adopted and a pilot test was conducted prior to the actual study. The participants were tested in three point of time (pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test). The findings indicate that there is a positive effect of direct and indirect WCF strategies on collocational competence. Furthermore, direct WCF has the most effect in improving collocational competency of the participants. Finally, both WCF strategies are proven statistically in retaining their effects as demonstrated in the results of delayed post-test. Suggestion for future studies are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document