Incompatible Images

2009 ◽  
pp. 186-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel J. Sassene
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
Per Se

This chapter investigates asthmatics’ reasons for not adopting an e-health system for asthma selfmanagement. An understanding of these reasons is particularly relevant, because clinical evidence indicates that, if used, such systems lead to better asthma management. The investigated asthma system is, however, based on a taken-for-granted image of asthmatics as, per se, striving to be symptom-free. This image is incompatible with interviewed asthmatics’ day-to-day performances of their asthma, and renders invisible (a) that their asthma performances emphasize an economy of good passages and of feeling capable, (b) that they achieve the objective of feeling capable in quite different ways, and (c) that feeling capable does not per se equal being symptom-free all the time. To attain long-term use of self-management systems and other patient-centred e-health systems, such systems must acknowledge and link into the manifold performances that comprise users’ ways of living with their disease.

scholarly journals What Makes Health Systems Resilient? A Qualitative Analysis of The Perspectives of Swiss NGOs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Yongeun Grimm ◽  
Kaspar Wyss
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Innovative Solutions ◽  
System Resilience ◽  
State Actors

Abstract Background: Resilience has become relevant than ever before with the advent of increasing and intensifying shocks on the health system and its amplified effects due to globalization. Using the example of non-state actors based in Switzerland, the aim of this study is to explore how and to what extent NGOs with an interest in global health have dealt with unexpected shocks on the health systems of their partner countries and to reflect on the practical implications of resilience for the multiple actors involved. Consequently, this paper analyses the key attributes of resilience that targeted investments may influence, and the different roles key stakeholders may assume to build resilience. Methods: This is a descriptive and exploratory qualitative study analysing the perspectives on health system resilience of Swiss-based NGOs through 20 in-depth interviews. Analysis proceeded using a data-driven thematic analysis closely following the framework method. An analytical framework was developed and applied systematically resulting in a complete framework matrix. The results are categorised into the expected role of the governments, the role of the NGOs, and practical future steps for building health system resilience. Results: The following four key ‘foundations of resilience’ were found to be dominant for unleashing greater resilience attributes regardless of the nature of shocks: ‘realigned relationships,’ ‘foresight,’ ‘motivation,’ and ‘emergency preparedness.’ The attribute to ‘integrate’ was shown to be one of the most crucial characteristics of resilience expected of the national governments from the NGOs, which points to the heightened role of governance. Meanwhile, as a key stakeholder group that is becoming inevitably more powerful in international development cooperation and global health governance, non-state actors namely the NGOs saw themselves in a unique position to facilitate knowledge exchange and to support long-term adaptations of innovative solutions that are increasing in demand. The strongest determinant of resilience in the health system was the degree of investments made for building long-term infrastructures and human resource development which are well-functioning prior to any potential crisis. Conclusions: Health system resilience is a collective endeavour and a result of many stakeholders’ consistent and targeted investments. These investments open up new opportunities to seek innovative solutions and to keep diverse actors in global health accountable. Strong governance, a bi-directional knowledge exchange, and the focus on leveraging science for impact can draw greater potential of resilience in the health systems. Governments and the NGOs have unique points of contribution in this journey towards resilience and may support governments to prioritise investing in the key ‘foundations of resilience’ in order to activate greater attributes of resilience.

scholarly journals Contexts and mechanisms that promote access to healthcare for populations experiencing homelessness: a realist review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikke Siersbaek ◽  
John Ford ◽  
Sara Burke ◽  
Clíona Ní Cheallaigh ◽  
Steve Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Healthcare Access ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Realist Review ◽  
Access To Healthcare ◽  
Staff Retention ◽  
Programme Theory ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to identify and understand the health system contexts and mechanisms that allow for homeless populations to access appropriate healthcare when needed.Design: A realist review.Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, embase.com, CINAHL, ASSIA and grey literature until April 2019. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: The purpose of the review was to identify health system patterns which enable access to healthcare for people who experience homelessness. Peer reviewed articles were first identified through a systematic search, grey literature searching, citation tracking and expert recommendations. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed for rigour and relevance and coded to identify data relating to contexts, mechanisms and/or outcomes.Analysis: Inductive coding was used to generate Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations which were refined and then used to build several iterations of the overarching programme theory.Results: Searching identified 330 review articles, of which 24 were included. Additional searching of grey literature yielded 50 records of which 12 were included. An additional 11 grey literature and primary sources were identified through citation tracking and expert recommendation for a total of 47 included sources. The analysis found that healthcare access for populations experiencing homelessness is improved when services are coordinated and delivered in a way that is organised around the person with a high degree of flexibility and a culture that rejects stigma generating trusting relationships between patients and staff/providers. Health systems should provide long-term, dependable funding for services to ensure sustainability and staff retention. Conclusions: With homelessness on the rise internationally, this study will inform health systems policy-making and implementation. It contributes to our understanding how healthcare systems can be more accessible for populations experiencing homelessness by providing long-term stable funding, promoting inclusive cultures and limiting stigma. Health systems should be flexible, timely and connected.

scholarly journals Health System Resilience: What Are We Talking About? A Scoping Review Mapping Characteristics and Keywords

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
My Fridell ◽  
Sanna Edwin ◽  
Johan von Schreeb ◽  
Dell D. Saulnier
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
World Health ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Quality Health ◽  
System Resilience ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Key Terms

Background: Health systems are based on 6 functions that need to work together at all times to effectively deliver safe and quality health services. These functions are vulnerable to shocks and changes; if a health system is unable to withstand the pressure from a shock, it may cease to function or collapse. The concept of resilience has been introduced with the goal of strengthening health systems to avoid disruption or collapse. The concept is new within health systems research, and no common description exists to describe its meaning. The aim of this study is to summarize and characterize the existing descriptions of health system resilience to improve understanding of the concept. Methods and Analysis: A scoping review was undertaken to identify the descriptions and characteristics of health system resilience. Four databases and gray literature were searched using the keywords "health system" and "resilience" for published documents that included descriptions, frameworks or characteristics of health system resilience. Additional documents were identified from reference lists. Four expert consultations were conducted to gain a broader perspective. Descriptions were analysed by studying the frequency of key terms and were characterized by using the World Health Organization (WHO) health system framework. The scoping review identified eleven sources with descriptions and 24 sources that presented characteristics of health system resilience. Frequently used terms that were identified in the literature were shock, adapt, maintain, absorb and respond. Change and learning were also identified when combining the findings from the descriptions, characteristics and expert consultations. Leadership and governance were recognized as the most important building block for creating health system resilience. Discussion: No single description of health system resilience was used consistently. A variation was observed on how resilience is described and to what depth it was explained in the existing literature. The descriptions of health system resilience primarily focus on major shocks. Adjustments to long-term changes and the element of learning should be considered for a better understating of health system resilience.

Cost-effectiveness of Diabetes Self-management Programs in Community Primary Care Settings

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 761-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Brownson ◽  
Thomas J. Hoerger ◽  
Edwin B. Fisher ◽  
Kerry E. Kilpatrick
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Simulation Model ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Systems Perspective ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Purpose The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in real-world community primary care settings. Estimates incorporated lifetime reductions in disease progression, costs of adverse events, and increases in quality of life. Methods Clinical results and costs were based on programs of the Diabetes Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, implemented in primary care and community settings in disadvantaged areas with notable health disparities. Program results were used as inputs to a Markov simulation model to estimate the long-term effects of self-management interventions. A health systems perspective was adopted. Results The simulation model estimates that the intervention does reduce discounted lifetime treatment and complication costs by $3385, but this is more than offset by the $15 031 cost of implementing the intervention and maintaining its effects in subsequent years. The intervention is estimated to reduce long-term complications, leading to an increase in remaining life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $39 563/QALY, well below a common benchmark of $50 000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the model’s estimates under various alternative assumptions. The model generally predicts acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios. Conclusions Self-management programs for type 2 diabetes are cost-effective from a health systems perspective when the cost savings due to reductions in long-term complications are recognized. These findings may justify increased reimbursement for effective self-management programs in diverse settings.

scholarly journals Can Asia provide models for tax-based European health systems? A comparative study of Singapore and Sweden

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Richard B. Saltman ◽  
Ming-Jui Yeh ◽  
Yu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Health Service ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Case Comparison

Abstract Singapore's health system generates similar levels of health outcomes as does Sweden's but for only 4.4% rather than 11.0% of gross domestic product, with Singapore's resulting health sector savings being re-directed to help fund both long-term care and retirement pensions for its elderly citizens. This paper contrasts the framework of financial risk-sharing and the configuration and management of health service providers in these two high-income, small-population countries. Two main institutional distinctions emerge from this country case comparison: (1) Key differences exist in the practical configuration of solidarity for payment of health care services, reflecting differing cultural roots and social expectations, which in turn carry substantial implications for financing long-term care and pensions. (2) Differing arrangements exist in the organization of health service institutions, in particular balancing public as against private sector responsibilities for owning, operating and managing these two countries' respective hospitals. These different structural characteristics generate fundamental differences in health sector financial and delivery outcomes in one developed country in Far East Asia as compared with a well-respected tax-funded health system in Western Europe. In the post-COVID era, as Western European policymakers find themselves forced to adjust their publicly funded health systems to (further) reductions in economic growth rates and overall tax receipts, and as the cost of the information revolution continues to rise while efforts to fund better coordinated social and home care services for growing numbers of chronically ill elderly remain inadequate, this two-country case comparison highlights a series of health system design questions that could potentially provide alternative health sector financing and service delivery strategies.

scholarly journals Evaluating Asthma Mobile Apps to Improve Asthma Self-Management: User Ratings and Sentiment Analysis of Publicly Available Apps

10.2196/15076 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e15076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Camacho-Rivera ◽  
Huy Vo ◽  
Xueqi Huang ◽  
Julia Lau ◽  
Adeola Lawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Average Rating ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Key Features ◽  
User Ratings

Background The development and use of mobile health (mHealth) apps for asthma management have risen dramatically over the past two decades. Asthma apps vary widely in their content and features; however, prior research has rarely examined preferences of users of publicly available apps. Objective The goals of this study were to provide a descriptive overview of asthma mobile apps that are publicly available and to assess the usability of asthma apps currently available on the market to identify content and features of apps associated with positive and negative user ratings. Methods Reviews were collected on June 23, 2020, and included publicly posted reviews until June 21, 2020. To characterize features associated with high or low app ratings, we first dichotomized the average user rating of the asthma app into 2 categories: a high average rating and a low average rating. Asthma apps with average ratings of 4 and above were categorized as having a high average rating. Asthma apps with average ratings of less than 4 were categorized as having a low average rating. For the sentiment analysis, we modeled both 2-word (bi-gram) and 3-word (tri-gram) phrases which commonly appeared across highly rated and lowly rated apps. Results Of the 10 apps that met the inclusion criteria, a total of 373 reviews were examined across all apps. Among apps reviewed, 53.4% (199/373) received high ratings (average ratings of 4 or 5) and 47.2% (176/373) received low ratings (average ratings of 3 or less). The number of ratings across all apps ranged from 188 (AsthmaMD) to 10 (My Asthma App); 30% (3/10) of apps were available on both Android and iOS. From the sentiment analysis, key features of asthma management that were common among highly rated apps included the tracking of peak flow readings (n=48), asthma symptom monitoring (n=11), and action plans (n=10). Key features related to functionality that were common among highly rated apps included ease of use (n=5). Users most commonly reported loss of data (n=14) and crashing of app (n=12) as functionality issues among poorly rated asthma apps. Conclusions Our study results demonstrate that asthma app quality, maintenance, and updates vary widely across apps and platforms. These findings may call into question the long-term engagement with asthma apps, a crucial factor for determining their potential to improve asthma self-management and asthma clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Solutions for Practicing Optimal Guided Asthma Self-Management: The Physician Perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandrine J Lamontagne ◽  
Sandra Peláez ◽  
Roland Grad ◽  
Lucie Blais ◽  
Kim L Lavoie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Physician Attitudes ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Physician Behaviour ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Guideline Dissemination

OBJECTIVE: To identify key solutions that facilitate the prescription of long-term asthma controller and provision of written self-management plans by physicians.METHODS: One hour individualized semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed independently by two trained qualitative researchers. A taxonomy of facilitators (contemplated solutions) and experienced solutions was achieved by consensus within the research team.RESULTS: Forty-two physicians (family physicians, pediatricians, emergency physicians, pulmonologists and allergists) were interviewed. The 867 facilitators and solutions, grouped in 10 categories, addressed three physician needs: support physicians in delivering optimal care (guideline dissemination, workplace culture, physician training and experience, physician attitudes toward optimal practice, tools and resources supporting physicians’ decision making); assist patients with following recommendations (patient characteristics, experiences and attitudes; physician behaviour; and tools and resources supporting patient self-management); and offer efficient services (reorganization of care; interprofessional patient management). Suggestions pertaining to the latter two categories were most frequently cited to optimize asthma management and use of self-management plans (eg, access to self-management plans; education by allied health care professionals). The most cited suggestions to support prescribing long-term controller pertained to physician behaviour (eg, involvement in patient education, personalization of prescriptions, feedback to patients of the benefits of long-term controller). The distribution of facilitators and solutions varied across specialties.CONCLUSIONS: Physicians proposed multiple facilitators and solutions to support optimal practice, leading to the development of a novel taxonomy. Key suggestions varied across physician specialties and behaviours sought, emphasizing the need to carefully select the most promising knowledge translation interventions.

scholarly journals The European Semester 2015-2018: themes and progress of country specific recommendations on health

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Clemens ◽  
N Azzopardi-Muscat
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Policy Coordination ◽  
Financial Sustainability ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Country Report ◽  
Keywords And Phrases ◽  
Country Specific

Abstract Background The European Semester (ES) is a policy coordination and scrutiny framework at EU-level for surveillance of fiscal and macro-economic policies in Member States. Health systems have not evaded that scrutiny. The analysis focusses on how health systems reforms are being endorsed in Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) and how the ES process links to planning and implementation of national health system reforms over the period 2015-2018. Methods A descriptive content analysis of CSRs with a search for the keywords and phrases ‘health’, OR ‘healthcare’, OR ‘long-term care’ was performed for the years 2015-2018. Furthermore, CSRs addressing health systems were classified according to whether they were targeting access, quality or sustainability; and categorized regarding organisation and governance, financing, physical and human resources, and provision of services. Finally, implementation progress on the health CSRs was rated according to EC’s own evaluation scheme derived from the preceding year’s country report. Results CSRs with health system recommendations have featured continuously in the ES process each year and have stabilised in number. The themes of health CSRs are still dominated by financial sustainability, cost-effectiveness and of financing, although other health system goals and domains, particularly access, are increasingly addressed. There is a high degree of consistency on the content of health CSRs over the years for each country addressed. Progress with implementation of health CSRs is disappointing so far, based on the EC evaluations. No clear link between discontinuation of health CSRs and evidence of progress in implementing the CSR can be discerned. Conclusions The results uncovered some of the links between national and European institutions leveraging the ES to push health system reforms. However, a more balanced and long-term view is needed for the ES to contribute solidly to complementing national efforts in a complex reform context. Key messages Health CSRs are still dominated by financial sustainability considerations while other health system goals and domains are increasingly addressed. Progress with implementation of health CSRs is disappointing so far, although a longer-term perspective is needed to pay tribute to the complex reform environment of health system reforms.

Bridges to sustainable health systems: public-private interaction for market access

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1929-1939
Author(s):  
Simone Guercini ◽  
Matilde Milanesi ◽  
Andrea Runfola
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Industrial Marketing ◽  
The Public ◽  
Recent Debate ◽  
Public Actor ◽  
Sustainable Health

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the market access (MA) of ethical drugs, the underlying public-private interaction (PPI) between pharmaceutical companies and public actors, and the implications for the sustainability of the health system. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative interpretivist approach was selected. Interviews were carried out as the primary method of data collection: 27 interviews were conducted with 13 key informants from the pharmaceutical industry. Findings The perspective of MA evolves from formal negotiation with the public actor at various levels to PPI, which should include aspects of interactions with other actors in the network. Conceptualization in these terms is fundamental because it allows an understanding of the implications in terms of the sustainability of the health system. Originality/value The paper discusses MA by highlighting the shift from a “market access as formal negotiation” perspective to a “public-private interaction for market access” perspective, in which the focus is on the content of the interaction and the representation of the network of relevant actors for MA. It contributes to the debate on the sustainability of health systems by suggesting the adoption of a medium-to-long-term approach to economic and social sustainability based on PPI; it adopts an industrial marketing approach and contributes to the recent debate on PPI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document